Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Ace Securities Private Limited v. Mani Compusoft Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Ace Securities Private Limited and Mani Compusoft Private Limited under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing the transferor company to be dissolved without winding up.
GNT Wood Mark Private Limited v. MG Polyplast Industries Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between GNT Wood Mark Private Limited and MG Polyplast Industries Private Limited under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dissolving the transferor company without winding up.
AAA Medicare Private Limited & Ors. v. Aditya Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the amended Scheme of Amalgamation of fifteen transferor companies into a transferee company under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, after addressing statutory compliance and objections.
Quadrant EPP Surlon Uttaranchal Private Limited v. Quadrant EPP Surlon India Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing dissolution of the transferor company without winding up.
Neelam Sisodia v. India Tourism Development Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, due to the respondent's failure to do so as per the contract's arbitration clause.
Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation v. Manoj Kumar & Anr
Employees under a contractual Voluntary Retirement Scheme may withdraw their applications before acceptance within the Scheme's validity period, but withdrawal after the Scheme's expiry is impermissible, and an amendment creating a new application window does not extend the original Scheme.
M/S PARK STREET PROPERTIES (PVT) LTD. v. DIPAK KUMAR SINGH & ANR.
The Supreme Court held that an unregistered lease agreement cannot override statutory provisions under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, and a monthly tenancy created thereby is terminable by 15 days' notice, validating the termination notice issued by the landlord.
ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. M/S. THE GENERAL FIBRE DEALERS
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment for failure to examine records and give reasons, remanding the matter for a fresh and expeditious hearing.
Amandeep Goyal v. Yogesh Rani
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's transfer of a divorce petition, emphasizing the husband's role as caretaker of a seriously ill child and directing the case to be heard in the original jurisdiction.
Bharwad Navghanbhaj Jakshibhai & Ors. v. State of Gujarat
The Supreme Court upheld convictions under Section 326 read with Section 149 IPC for unlawful assembly causing injuries but modified the sentence by restoring original imprisonment and increasing compensation.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Madras v. M/s Addison & Co. Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that excise duty refund claims are permissible only if the claimant has not passed on the duty burden, and refund to manufacturers who have passed on the duty results in unjust enrichment.
Laxmi Bai & Ors. v. T. Jagadish & Ors.
The Supreme Court disposed of a property partition dispute appeal by recording a mediation settlement and rendering pending proceedings infructuous.
M/s. Chandiwala Enterprises v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that Development Agreements are eligible for refund of stamp duty under Section 47(c)(5) of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958, and remanded the matter for inquiry and fresh decision by the Collector.
M/S. HIMALAYAN FLORA AND AROMAS PVT. LTD. v. SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of petitions challenging earlier orders with liberty to file fresh petitions against new orders, while continuing the status quo order for three weeks.
Vijay Kumar & Anr. v. University of Delhi & Ors.
Petitions against University of Delhi were dismissed as withdrawn after the petitioners informed the court that the reliefs sought had already been granted.
Union of India v. Shama Rani & Anr
Appeals concerning compensation for acquired lands were dismissed for non-prosecution due to non-payment of court fees, as the issue was conclusively settled by a prior judgment affirmed by the Supreme Court.
Amit Kumar & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal proceeding under Section 498-A IPC arising from matrimonial disputes upon an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Randeer & Ors. v. State (N.C.T of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal proceeding under Section 498-A IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Sunil & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT Delhi) & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Jayant Bhargava & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498-A IPC based on a genuine compromise, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.