Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Consumer Financial Services Limited v. L&T Housing Finance Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Consumer Financial Services Limited and L&T Housing Finance Limited under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dissolving the transferor company without winding up.
Rattanindia Nasik Power Ltd v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that unconditional Bank Guarantees are independent contracts unaffected by termination disputes and must be kept alive during arbitration to protect advance payments, modifying the Arbitral Tribunal's order releasing all guarantees.
Rattanindia Power Ltd v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that unconditional Bank Guarantees are independent contracts unaffected by termination of the underlying contract and must be kept alive during arbitration unless exceptional circumstances exist, modifying the Arbitral Tribunal's order to protect the appellant's interests.
AV Beverages Private Limited v. Solar Print Process Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between a wholly owned subsidiary and its holding company under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings of shareholders and creditors due to absence of objections.
HT Media Limited v. HT Digital Streams Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Arrangement between HT Media Limited and HT Digital Streams Limited under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 after requisite approvals and compliance with statutory requirements.
Chandpur Enterprises Limited v. VKM Industries Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Arrangement involving demerger of business divisions under the Companies Act, 1956, allowing procedural lapses to be rectified post-sanction.
Mukesh Bhatia v. Ram Gopal Gupta
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking forensic examination of a cheque at a late stage of a long-pending NI Act case, emphasizing prevention of undue delay and the need for timely bona fide applications.
Lionforge Fracht Veranstalter Private Limited v. Balaji Infra Private Limited & Dighi Port Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the applicant company to dispense with convening shareholder and creditor meetings and sanctioned the Composite Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Holistic Dentistry Private Limited v. Kaizen Builders and Developers Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approving a Scheme of Amalgamation where all parties consented in writing, under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Elite Townships Private Limited v. Proud Buildwell Private Limited & Wisdom Infrahome Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Arrangement involving demerger and transfer of business undertakings after ensuring compliance with statutory and FDI policy requirements.
B.J. Duplex Boards Limited v. Regional Director, Northern Region
The Delhi High Court approved B.J. Duplex Boards Limited's petition for reduction of its share capital under the Companies Act, 1956 and 2013, confirming compliance with statutory requirements and absence of prejudice to creditors or shareholders.
Indeen Bio Power Limited v. Its shareholders
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Arrangement involving reduction and reorganization of share capital of Indeen Bio Power Limited under the Companies Act, 1956, after statutory approvals and no objections from regulatory authorities.
Abhishek v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 308 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Rajpal v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to accused in a forgery case, holding that bail cannot be cancelled without cogent grounds such as interference with justice or abuse of bail.
Narender Sagar & Ors. v. State (NCT) of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable FIR under Sections 308/323/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Ganges Concast Industries Limited v. Salasar Stainless Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between a wholly owned subsidiary and its holding company under the Companies Act, 1956, subject to compliance with procedural requirements and payment of costs.
Apra Automobiles Private Limited v. Registrar of Companies
The Delhi High Court allowed restoration of a company’s name struck off for non-filing of statutory documents under Section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956, emphasizing the interests of justice and compliance with procedural requirements.
CFR Asset Reconstruction India Limited v. Regional Director, Northern Region
The Delhi High Court approved the reduction of share capital of CFR Asset Reconstruction India Limited after ensuring compliance with statutory procedures and addressing objections raised by the Regional Director.
Marvel Institute of Technology Private Limited; Shiva Infosystem Private Limited; New Ways Buildwell Private Limited v. Yuga Estate Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 after finding compliance with statutory requirements and no objections from regulatory authorities.
Masterji Metalloys Private Limited v. Good Luck Steel Tubes Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Masterji Metalloys Private Limited and Good Luck Steel Tubes Limited under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dissolving the transferor company without winding up.