Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
PROTO DEVELOPERS AND TECHNOLOGIES LTD v. M/S ANTRIKSH REALTECH PVT LTD & ANR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award, holding that the award was a plausible interpretation of the contract supported by evidence and did not suffer from patent illegality or jurisdictional error.
Anil Kumar v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
Anticipatory bail was dismissed where the accused failed to join investigation despite repeated notices and was absent from court.
Amir & Anr. v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Harvinder Singh Sodhi v. State NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail granted where prosecution failed to establish prima facie cheating, underscoring that criminal law should not be misused for civil money recovery disputes.
Embassy of Peru v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the registration of the GI "PERUVIAN PISCO" to Peru, rejecting exclusive registration of "PISCO" due to coexistence with Chilean Pisco and likelihood of consumer confusion under Section 9(a) of the GI Act.
Dr. Krishna Bihari v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the selection of Respondent No. 3 as Regional Director, holding that courts cannot interfere with expert selection committee decisions absent mala fide or arbitrariness, especially where qualifications encompass broad allied disciplines.
Star Health and Allied Insurance Co Ltd v. Menka
The Delhi High Court condoned a four-day delay in deposit of decretal amount, reinstated the stay on a consumer forum order, and quashed warrants issued against the petitioner's banker and bank official.
Dilip Vishwanath Gondnale v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that denial of promotion based solely on inclusion in the 'Agreed List' without suspension or charge sheet is impermissible, directing promotion of the petitioner with consequential benefits.
PRODUCTS INDIA LTD v. SUMITOMO CHEMICAL COMPANY LTD
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal, holding that the plaint disclosed a cause of action and could not be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(a) CPC at the threshold stage in a trademark and copyright infringement suit.
Sajna Devi v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that absence of a recovered ticket does not negate bona fide passenger status and remanded the claim for compensation for a railway accident, emphasizing the beneficial nature of the Railways Act provisions.
Abrar v. N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the murder conviction based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence including last seen testimony and recoveries, ruling that non-recovery of the dead body is not fatal to the prosecution case.
Jitan Bora v. The State (Govt. of NCT) Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC, rejecting his plea of grave and sudden provocation and holding that the prosecution proved the offence beyond reasonable doubt.
Sanjay Chauhan & Ors. v. The State (N.C.T. of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC on the ground of compromise and withdrawal of prosecution by the complainant in a matrimonial dispute.
Arun Chaudhary & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the ground of amicable settlement and reconciliation between the parties.
Daulat Kumar @ Daulat Ram & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following a voluntary compromise and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
Shivanshu Aggarwal v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 341, 323, and 506 IPC based on a compromise between the parties and the complainant's withdrawal of grievance, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023.
Ravikant alias Bittu and Anr v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 186, 353, 332, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and the complainants' consent, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023.
Amit & Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on a matrimonial settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Karamjeet & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023.
Fahed Khan & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute on the basis of amicable settlement and reconciliation between the parties.