Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Narender Yadav v. Delhi Cantonment Board
The Delhi High Court directed the Delhi Cantonment Board to consider the petitioner’s representations for issuance of a Certificate of Vending based on prior challans, in line with the Town Vending Committee’s resolution protecting vendors excluded from the initial survey.
Prem Chand Gupta & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs involving simple injuries under BNS 2023 based on a voluntary compromise between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 to promote peace and justice.
UNIBIC FOODS INDIA PVT LTD v. BIKANER BHUJIA UDYOG SANGH
The Delhi High Court disposed of trademark dispute appeals by recording a binding settlement agreement requiring cessation of infringing use and withdrawal of conflicting trademark applications.
EXEMED PHARMACEUTICALS v. INCYTE HOLDINGS CORPORATION & ORS.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal against an ex parte interim injunction by advancing the hearing date and directing procedural steps without deciding the merits.
Shekhar Sharma v. The Institute of Chartered Accountant of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the disciplinary Board must provide reasons when rejecting a prima facie opinion of misconduct and cannot dismiss complaints as family disputes without proper adjudication.
Sai Kripa Eye and Children Hospital v. Quality Council of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that the cause of action arising outside Delhi precludes the Court from entertaining the petition despite the order being passed in Delhi.
Samata Party v. Directorate of Enforcement & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging ED summons for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that the dominant cause of action arising outside Delhi precludes the Court's jurisdiction despite the ED Head Office being in Delhi.
Manish Popli v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court set aside the proclamation order declaring the petitioner a proclaimed person due to improper service and continuous cooperation during COVID-19 restrictions, quashing all consequential proceedings.
Jitendra v. Delhi Cantonment Board
The Delhi High Court directed the Cantonment Board to consider the petitioner’s claim for a Certificate of Vending based on pre-survey challans in accordance with Town Vending Committee resolutions.
Narender Kumar v. The Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that sanitation workers performing essential COVID-19 related duties are entitled to ex-gratia compensation without artificial distinction between routine and COVID duty, directing payment of Rs. 1 crore to the petitioner.
Pappu v. Delhi Cantonment Board
The Delhi High Court directed the Delhi Cantonment Board to consider the petitioner’s representation for issuance of a Certificate of Vending based on prior challans and protect him from eviction pending final decision.
Anita Devi v. Delhi Cantonment Board
The Delhi High Court directed the Cantonment Board to consider the petitioner’s claim for a Certificate of Vending based on pre-survey challans, following the Town Vending Committee’s resolution protecting street vendors excluded from the initial survey.
Ramvresh v. Delhi Cantonment Board
The Delhi High Court directed the Delhi Cantonment Board to consider the petitioner's claim for a Certificate of Vending based on pre-survey challans and protect his vending rights pending final decision.
Bharti Cooperative Thrift and Credit Society Ltd. v. Registrar Cooperative Societies Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed salary deductions from a government employee borrower to enforce a cooperative society's arbitration award for loan recovery under the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2023.
DR RITA BAKSHI v. SEEMA BAJAJ
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 223(1) BNSS, a Magistrate takes cognizance upon examining the complainant and witnesses, and the accused must be given notice and opportunity of hearing thereafter before formal cognizance, dismissing the petition but referring the issue for Larger Bench consideration.
Samsung India Electronics Private Limited v. Delhi International Arbitration Centre & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the DIAC Co-ordinator's order allowing separate assessment of arbitrators' fees for claim and counter claim when a party failed to pay fees on the aggregate amount, distinguishing prior precedent.
THE ORIENTAL INSURNACE CO LTD v. MANISH MADAN @ MUNISH MADAN & ORS
The Delhi High Court upheld the claimant's entitlement to enhanced compensation for permanent disability in a motor accident claim, clarifying the distinction between medical disability and loss of earning capacity, rejecting contributory negligence, and affirming 9% interest on the award.
Anil Kumar v. Mohd Kamil & Ors
Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by recognizing the claimant's skilled vocation, granting future prospects, increasing functional disability assessment, and reducing interest rate to 9% per annum.
Manisha Projects Pvt Ltd v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award rendered pursuant to a unilateral appointment of arbitrator without an express waiver, reaffirming that such appointments violate the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Sonika Arya v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a candidate on a waitlist has no enforceable right to appointment after the expiry of the panel's validity period, and vacancies arising thereafter cannot be filled from an exhausted waitlist.