Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Assistant SCI. v. Harsh Kumar Vashisht
The Delhi High Court held that a public authority is entitled to file appeals under Section 19 of the RTI Act and must exhaust this remedy before approaching the High Court under Article 226.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA THROUGH ITS REGISTRY v. MOHD SUFFIYAN
The Delhi High Court held that a public authority is entitled to file appeals under Section 19 of the RTI Act and must exhaust such statutory remedies before approaching the High Court under Article 226.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA v. ANURAG MANKOTIA
The Delhi High Court held that public authorities are entitled to file appeals under the RTI Act and must exhaust statutory appellate remedies before approaching the High Court.
APS Hydro Pvt Ltd v. Union of India
The High Court set aside the Policy Relaxation Committee’s unreasoned rejection of a deemed export benefit claim and directed fresh consideration in accordance with law.
Union of India and Ors. v. Ex NK Pramod S
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension to a retired soldier, holding that under the 2008 Entitlement Rules, the military must provide cogent reasons to deny pension when a disability arises during service.
Sheelo Devi & Ors. v. Suresh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying a higher multiplier and awarding loss of consortium to each claimant, rejecting unreliable salary proof.
Manju Singh v. Naim Khan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced motor accident compensation by adding 40% future prospects and applying multiplier based on deceased's age, aligning with Supreme Court precedents.
National Insurance Co Ltd v. Laxmi Bisht & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the MACT award granting compensation for a fatal motor accident, affirming negligence on preponderance of probabilities and allowing inclusion of an assured salary increment in income calculation under exceptional circumstances.
Orissa Alloy Steel Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that the essential cause of action arose outside Delhi despite the impugned order being passed there.
Adla Satya Narayan Rao v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the refusal to disclose information on a drug application under RTI exemptions for commercial confidence and trade secrets, finding no larger public interest warranting disclosure.
Birinder Kaur v. Baltej Sra
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint to include specific particulars of fraud under Order VI Rule 17 CPC, emphasizing the necessity of detailed pleadings in fraud cases for effective adjudication.
MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL PROPERTIES INC v. REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of the "CHICAGO" trademark registration as the retraction order was based on grounds not specified in the show cause notice, violating principles of natural justice.
Umesh Varma v. The Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the grant of Letters of Administration to the petitioner natural heir after taking on record the Executor's renunciation under the Indian Succession Act, in an uncontested probate matter.
Naveen Rathi & SI Manisha v. Mohd Shamsher
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in an attempted rape case due to material contradictions in witness testimony and lack of corroborative medical evidence.
IDFC Foundation v. Bharat Telematics Private Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator by mutual consent of parties, dispensing with procedural formalities, to expedite arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Himanshu Luthra v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that Look Out Circulars cannot be issued against personal guarantors without allegations of fraud or criminal conduct, affirming the fundamental right to travel and quashing the impugned LOC issued on mere loan default grounds.
Deepak Agarwal & Anr. v. Anubhav Sharma
The Delhi High Court held that once arbitrators are appointed and arbitration proceedings have advanced, the Court cannot order consolidation of arbitration proceedings, rejecting belated applications for joint trial to uphold minimal judicial interference.
TATA CAPITAL HOUSING FINANCE LTD v. NITIN KUMAR AGGARWAL
The Delhi High Court held that unconditional withdrawal of arbitration proceedings precludes re-invocation of the same arbitration clause on the same cause of action, and dismissed the petition seeking appointment of an arbitrator where the dispute was found to be satisfied by insolvency-related payments.
DATA TECHNOSYS(ENGINEERS) PVT. LTD. v. RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED
The Delhi High Court substituted the sole arbitrator under Section 29A(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to prevent undue delay and ensure expeditious arbitration proceedings.
Association of Clinical Biochemists and Microbiologists v. National Medical Commission
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of writ petitions challenging the National Medical Commission after an amendment notification resolved the petitioners' grievances.