Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Kalanithi Maran v. M/S Spicejet Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Petitioners' plea to substitute cash deposit with property security in enforcement of an arbitral award, holding repeated delay tactics as abuse of process and extending limited time to comply.
Union of India v. Gurmeet Singh and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Registrar General of India's authority under the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 (as amended in 2023) to investigate and resolve conflicting death certificates to maintain the integrity of the national database.
Kamruddin @ Kamru v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court directed the State to verify medical documents and decide on the petitioner’s furlough request within five days, without granting immediate relief.
Abhinay Kumar v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused in a cheating and criminal breach of trust case due to insufficient prima facie evidence and the accused's cooperation with the investigation.
Star Health and Allied Insurance Co Ltd v. Reena
The Delhi High Court condoned a one-day delay in deposit of decretal amount and restored stay on a consumer forum order, disposing of the petition filed under Article 227.
Star Health and Allied Insurance Company Limited v. Priya Devi
The Delhi High Court condoned a four-day delay in depositing the decretal amount and restored the stay on a consumer forum order, disposing of the petition filed under Article 227.
Star Health and Allied Insurance Co Ltd v. Menka
The Delhi High Court condoned a four-day delay in deposit of decretal amount and restored the stay on a consumer forum order pending appeal, disposing of the petition under Article 227.
STAR HEALTH AND ALLIED INSURANCE CO. LTD v. PRIYA DEVI
The Delhi High Court condoned a four-day delay in deposit of decretal amount and reinstated the stay on a consumer forum order, quashing coercive warrants issued against the petitioner's banker and bank official.
Star Health and Allied Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sonia Singh
The Delhi High Court condoned a four-day delay in depositing decretal amount and restored the stay of the consumer forum's order pending appeal, disposing of the petition accordingly.
Charu Singh Rathore v. A. Raja Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a contempt petition after the respondents filed a compliance affidavit and the petitioner acknowledged that the contempt did not survive.
2 Million Lives at Risk v. Rajasthan
The Supreme Court mandated stringent enforcement and coordinated remedial measures to address systemic pollution and environmental degradation of the Jojari River in Rajasthan, emphasizing State accountability and the Polluter Pays principle.
R. HALLE v. RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by holding that uncontroverted medical and neuropsychological evidence of severe cognitive impairment warrants assessing functional disability at 100%, overruling the High Court's reduction to 30%.
Steel Authority of India v. Shambhu Prasad Singh
The Supreme Court held that SAIL can withhold gratuity and adjust penal rent for ex-employees retaining staff quarters beyond permissible periods, overruling earlier concessions and emphasizing simultaneous discharge of reciprocal obligations.
Ravikiran Vasant Gore v. M/s. Sainath Enterprises Partnership Firm & Ors.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition challenging the appellate court’s order lifting the temporary injunction restraining development of disputed property, holding that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case and balance of convenience for interim relief.
Assistant SCI. v. Lakshya Choudhary
The Delhi High Court held that public authorities are entitled to file appeals under Section 19 of the RTI Act and must exhaust this remedy before approaching the High Court, dismissing the petition for non-exhaustion of statutory appeal.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA v. LOVE KAUSHIK
The Delhi High Court held that a public authority is entitled to file appeals under Section 19 of the RTI Act and must exhaust this statutory remedy before approaching the High Court under Article 226.
Assistant SCI. v. Anjali Singh
The Delhi High Court held that a public authority is a "person" entitled to file appeals under Section 19 of the RTI Act and must exhaust this statutory remedy before approaching the High Court.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA v. TEJAS
The Delhi High Court held that public authorities are entitled to file appeals under Section 19 of the RTI Act and must exhaust this remedy before approaching the High Court.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA THROUGH ITS REGISTRY v. YOGENDER
The Delhi High Court held that public authorities are entitled to file appeals under Section 19 of the RTI Act and must exhaust this remedy before approaching the High Court under Article 226.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA v. MUKUND SHARMA
The Delhi High Court held that a public authority is entitled to file appeals under Section 19 of the RTI Act and must exhaust this remedy before approaching the High Court.