Nirupati Charan Sahoo v. Union of India and Others

Delhi High Court · 02 Jul 2025 · 2025:DHC:5228-DB

C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul

W.P.(C) 8851/2025

2025:DHC:5228-DB

administrative petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the DG, ITBP to decide the petitioner's pending representation within two weeks, ensuring timely administrative action.

Full Text

W.P.(C) 8851/2025
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 8851/2025
NIRUPATI CHARAN SAHOO .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Raghunath Pathak, Mr. Varad Dwivedi and Mr. Aditya Narayan
Tripathy, Advs.

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....Respondents
Through: Ms. Shagun Shahi Chugh, SPC

WITH

Mr. Varun Chugh and Ms. Nandita Mishra, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL
ORDER (ORAL)
02.07.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

JUDGMENT

1. The only prayer in this writ petition is for a direction to the DG, ITBP to decide the petitioner’s representation, preferred as far back as on 26 December 2024.

2. Issue notice.

3. Notice is accepted on behalf of the respondents by Ms. Shagun Shahi Chugh.

4. Rule, returnable forthwith. W.P.(C) 8851/2025

5. In view of the limited prayer sought, we deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to take a decision on the petitioner’s representation dated 26 December 2024 within a period of two weeks from today and communicate the decision to the petitioner forthwith.

6. The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

C.HARI SHANKAR, J. AJAY DIGPAUL, J. JULY 2, 2025 AR Click here to check corrigendum, if any

Nirupati Charan Sahoo v. Union of India and Others

AI Summary

Full Text

JUDGMENT

Contact Us for a Free Consultation