Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Vikram Dogra & Anr. v. Devender Kumar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Arbitral Tribunal's modification of an issue from 'valid' to 'invalid' agreement, holding that judicial interference under Article 227 is limited and the Tribunal's discretion in framing issues must be respected.
Mold Tek Packaging Limited v. Pronton Plast Pack Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court set aside the order vacating interim injunction in a patent infringement suit, emphasizing the need for product-to-patent comparison and proper assessment of credible challenge to patent validity under Sections 107 and 64 of the Patents Act.
Masjidnoor Ahmed Waqf through Mohd Azam v. Mohd Mubarak & Anr
The court allowed the decree holder a limited opportunity to cross-examine the Objector in an old execution petition to prevent prejudice, balancing fairness with the need for timely disposal.
Shobha Sachdeva & Anr. v. Narender Kumar Sachdeva
The Delhi High Court directed the First Appellate Court to expedite disposal of a pending appeal against an injunction order, emphasizing timely justice and judicial priority.
Mr. Tushar Tokas and Ms. Arbinder Kaur v. Sharul Mathur
The High Court held that a show-cause notice under Order XV-A CPC is mandatory before striking off a defense for non-compliance, setting aside the Trial Court's order and remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
Muhammed Akkoyun v. Fluper Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Trial Court's imposition of cost for video conferencing but allowed the petitioner to seek a fresh waiver application to be decided afresh.
Girija Devi v. Govind
The High Court granted the petitioner a final opportunity to file a fresh affidavit and examine herself before the Trial Court, ensuring procedural fairness and continuation of the suit.
Vishawjeet Sarkar & Ors. v. The State Govt. (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and reconciliation between the parties, applying the principle that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.
Nitesh Singh & Ors. v. State (NCT) of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Sushila Bari & Anr. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Arun Kumar Srivastava v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 288 and 337 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, applying Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and Supreme Court precedent.
Davinder Singh v. Delhi Cantonment Board
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of eviction notice upon expiry of a thirty-year lease, directing due process for eviction and mandating consideration of petitioner's representation for fresh lease independently of eviction proceedings.
Brij Bhushan Airy v. Delhi Cantonment Board
The Delhi High Court held that a lease limited to thirty years cannot be extended unilaterally beyond its term, but directed the lessor to consider the lessee’s renewal representation before eviction following due legal process.
Rahul Verma v. Delhi Cantonment Board
The Delhi High Court held that a lease limited to thirty years cannot be extended without mutual consent, directed the respondent to consider the petitioner’s renewal request, and mandated eviction only after due legal process post lease expiry.
Shagufta Feroz and Anr v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed de-sealing of petitioners' property upon their undertaking to use it lawfully and compliance with procedural requirements, affirming the necessity of Show Cause Notices before sealing.
Anand Yadav & Anr. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to consider the petitioners' application for de-sealing their shop used for permissible activities, subject to undertaking and assessment of misuse charges.
Suniti Madan v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court remanded the NDMC demand for outstanding dues for reconciliation and directed clear communication and hearing before finalizing charges for condonable breaches in a leased commercial property.
Manju Devi v. M/S Cholamandalam General Insurance Company Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that family pension and similar benefits cannot be deducted from statutory compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, allowing the appellant's challenge to such deduction in a motor accident claim.
Prakash Chand v. Bahadur Singh
The High Court dismissed the petition for default and nonprosecution due to the petitioner's repeated nonappearance and failure to comply with court orders including payment of costs.
Akhil Kumar Alias Dev and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would serve no useful purpose.