Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/S. BVG INDIA LTD. v. NAGAR NIGAM JAIPUR GREATER & ANR
In absence of a designated seat of arbitration, the court at the place where arbitration proceedings are conducted has exclusive jurisdiction, and a general exclusive jurisdiction clause does not override this principle.
Prism Johnson Ltd v. Doosan Power Systems India Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that parties may agree on a distinct procedure for appointment of arbitrators differing from institutional rules, and court may appoint an arbitrator if a party fails to act under that agreed procedure, allowing the petition for appointment of respondent's arbitrator.
Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd v. Mirador Commercial Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the Sole Arbitrator’s appointment under Clause 39.2 of the contract, dismissing the Petitioner’s challenge that it was a unilateral appointment violating party autonomy and arbitration law.
Ravi Patwardhan v. N.K. Jambholkar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging the quashing of appointments as academic since the petitioners had already served their tenure under interim orders and were entitled to retiral benefits.
India Steel v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to lack of proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of related GST notifications to the Supreme Court.
Pavan Kumar v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representation within four weeks, emphasizing the obligation to avoid undue delay without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Trehan International Consultants and Engineers Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax and Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order due to improper service of notice via an inaccessible portal tab, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication with proper hearing, while leaving the validity of the impugned notification open pending Supreme Court review.
CMR Green Technologies Limited v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that refund amounts cannot be re-credited to import licenses under an abolished scheme and must be paid directly, while upholding dismissal of belated appeals on limitation grounds.
Ranjeet Singh & Ors. v. Neeru Mehta (Deceased) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's imposition of Rs. 30,000 cost for belated filing of written statement, refusing to interfere under Article 227 absent perversity or illegality.
Mohd Ashraf and Ors v. Abdul Wahid Siddique
The court directed expeditious disposal of the pending appeal and allowed the trial court to consider directions under Section 151 CPC for deposit of user charges, while upholding the binding nature of consent given before the appellate court not to press execution.
BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd v. Dwarka Parshad & Anr.
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretion to admit quotations at the evidence stage, dismissing the petition challenging the admission of documents in a civil suit for fire damages.
Sunny @ Nand Kishore Gandhi v. Guddi Khatun
The Delhi High Court held that a suit seeking injunction against unauthorized roof construction discloses a cause of action and dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's order, directing expeditious disposal and verification of civic sanctions.
Shri Rajbir Jain Prop of M/s Shikha Enterprises v. Paragon Paper Industries LLP
The High Court declined to interfere with the Trial Court's jurisdictional order at the final stage of trial, directing the Trial Court to decide territorial jurisdiction afresh based on pleadings and evidence.
Rinku v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused charged with serious sexual offences and abduction, holding that the gravity of the crime and incriminating video evidence outweigh the accused’s plea for bail.
Hari Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court directed the State to consider the petitioner's case for premature release by the Sentence Review Board without granting release as a matter of right.
Jatin Dagar & Ors. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 110/3(5) BNS following an amicable settlement between parties, relying on the principle that continuation of criminal proceedings would be unfair and an abuse of process.
Ankit Kapoor v. Manya Vijh
The Delhi High Court upheld the interim maintenance awarded to the wife and child but allowed the wife's appeal directing the husband to bear full cost of the medically necessary advanced cochlear implant surgery for their special needs child.
M/S PRABUTAV ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that land allotted under Section 74(4) of the Delhi Land Reforms Act can be transferred without restriction where no statutory fetters exist, and directed issuance of LSRs/NOCs for sale of such land in urbanised village Dera Mandi.
M/S SITA RAM IRON FOUNDRY AND ENGINEERING WORKS v. HINDUSTAN TECHNOCAST (P) LTD. AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of the "BADAL" trademark registration on grounds of alleged fraud, holding that serious allegations require cogent evidence and trial, and mere pleadings without proof are insufficient for rectification.
MD ARAM v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld CBSE’s decision declaring the petitioner failed in Class XII Board exams due to failure in three theory subjects and held that eligibility for passing and supplementary exams requires passing both theory and internal assessments as per Bye-Laws.