Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Surender Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that cancellation of a provisional appointment for non-joining is unjustified if the employer fails to arrange the mandatory medical examination despite the candidate's acceptance and requests.
High Precision Corps v. Commissioner of State Goods and Service Tax, Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a GST demand for fraudulent ITC, directing the petitioner to file an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act with extended limitation, emphasizing sparing exercise of writ jurisdiction in such cases.
Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-1, New Delhi v. Fujitsu Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's ruling that compensation and interest received under an arbitral award constitute business income exempt from Indian tax under the India-Japan DTAA due to absence of a Permanent Establishment.
Sangeeta Devi and Another v. Sarita and Others
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of an application to implead unmarried sisters as parties in a MACT case for lack of pleaded necessity, allowing them liberty to file a fresh application.
Satish Kumar Sharma v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representations for retiral benefits within six weeks by passing a speaking order and releasing entitled benefits forthwith.
Dr. Vandana Bagga v. Vinai Kumar Saxena
The Delhi High Court held that the Central Administrative Tribunal is not a court subordinate to it under Article 228, and thus a transfer petition under Article 228 to move a contempt petition from the CAT to the High Court is not maintainable.
Union Bank of India v. Jitender Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court’s award declaring the termination of a temporary workman illegal for non-compliance with Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act and affirmed compensation in lieu of reinstatement.
Gulista Khatoon v. Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court held that detention and confiscation of gold jewellery worn by a passenger without issuance of a valid Show Cause Notice and personal hearing under Section 124 of the Customs Act is illegal, and such jewellery qualifies as personal effects exempt from customs duty.
R C Singh v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Armed Forces Tribunal to expedite hearing, holding that the tribunal alone has discretion to prioritize and manage its cases.
Vinod Kumar and Anr v. Neeraj Mittal and Ors
The High Court allowed the petition challenging dismissal of an application under Section 151 CPC for correction of pleadings, directing the Trial Court to decide the application on merits after ensuring procedural compliance.
Govind Singh Nainwal v. Deepak Khosla and Anr
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Trial Court's order condoning delay in filing the written statement, holding that such discretion will not be interfered with unless there is illegality or perversity.
K. L. Manhas v. M/S Skystar Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the NCDRC's refusal to pre-pone hearing, holding that supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 cannot be invoked for mere denial of preponement.
Sanjeev v. Urmilla
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's closure of the defendant's right to further cross-examine the plaintiff due to repeated non-appearance and dilatory conduct, dismissing the petition for a final opportunity.
Jayaditta Palit & Anr. v. Pramod Anand Through His Legal Heir
The Delhi High Court restored a petition dismissed as withdrawn due to inadvertence, directing payment of enhanced costs to reinstate documents taken off record for non-payment.
Rajesh Kumar v. Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Singh
The Delhi High Court refused to interfere with the Trial Court’s order condoning delay in filing written statement in a commercial suit after trial completion, emphasizing the statutory 120-day limit and allowing the petitioner to raise the issue in appeal.
Harish Chander Pandey v. The Jag Jivan Cooperative House Building Society Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court’s refusal to allow the petitioner to amend pleadings to introduce a belated and fundamentally new claim of society membership and flat allotment, dismissing the petition under Article 227.
Balaji Steel v. Sialkot Shop
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of a vague amendment application to reduce the suit amount, while allowing the petitioner to seek waiver of imposed costs.
Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. v. KRA Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court remanded the arbitral tribunal's order for fresh consideration of a jurisdictional issue concerning the applicability of the MSME Act to a works contract, emphasizing limited but necessary judicial interference under Article 227.
M/S SISLA LABORATORIES v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF CGST
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a belated appeal against the rejection of a GST refund application due to non-communication of the order and directed processing of a second refund application with interest.
Hari Nath & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, emphasizing the Court's power under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to promote peace and avoid futile litigation.