Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Sachin Rajput v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings against the petitioner following a voluntary and amicable settlement between the parties under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Amit Singh v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 341, 506, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary amicable settlement between the parties, emphasizing the court's power under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Daman Preet Singh v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR under Sections 279 and 337 IPC based on a voluntary settlement between the parties, emphasizing the promotion of peace and avoidance of futile litigation.
Manjeet Singh v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a motor accident FIR under Sections 279 and 337 IPC following an amicable settlement and compensation paid to the victims, relying on its power under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Neera Misra v. Rakesh Chandra Misra
The Delhi High Court allowed amendment of the plaint to include the Trust as plaintiff and a declaratory relief of ownership, dismissed the defendant's rejection application, and held the suit maintainable on the basis of possession and pleadings.
Vidya Rai v. National Testing Agency & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that challenges to examination answer keys must be made within the prescribed window and refused to entertain belated objections raised for the first time in a writ petition, dismissing the petition.
Vinod Rai @ Bhullan v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court partly allowed the appeal by acquitting the appellant of certain offences but upheld his conviction for aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a minor, reducing his sentence to 20 years rigorous imprisonment.
Municipal Staff Om Satlaj Co-op Hsg Sty Ltd v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that a municipal authority cannot insist on an NOC from a terminated and insolvent developer to stall redevelopment projects when a new developer is appointed by the cooperative housing society.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-2, Mumbai v. Nahar Enterprises
The Bombay High Court upheld the ITAT's ruling excluding flower beds, service areas, window and cupboard projections from built-up area calculations under Section 80IB(10), dismissing the Revenue's appeal and leaving the validity of the search warrant issue undecided.
Suraj Anand Shukla v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court set aside the conviction under Section 385 BNSS for contempt due to procedural irregularity, holding that the learned Judge must refer the matter to the jurisdictional Magistrate as per Section 391 BNSS.
Supriya Raju Mehta v. National Highway Authority of India
The Bombay High Court held that NHAI cannot be treated as a third party to condone a two-year delay in challenging a statutory arbitral award under the National Highways Act, affirming the strict limitation period under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Ganesh Dnyandeo Rokade & Ors. v. The Principal Secretary
Employees appointed on compassionate grounds after 1st November 2005 but included in the selection list before that date are entitled to the Old Pension Scheme as per the Government Resolution dated 1st October 2024.
Sunita Gorakhnath Deshmukh v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that overage objections raised belatedly after long service and retirement cannot be sustained, directing regularization and payment of benefits to employees similarly situated to others whose overage was condoned.
Tukaram Moraba Jaunjal and Ors. v. Mangala Balkrishna Patwardhan and Ors.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging eviction on ground of continuous non-user without reasonable cause, upholding concurrent factual findings and limiting interference under Article 227.
Baban Sadashiv Sasar and Ors. v. Nivrutti Sabaji Sasar & Ors.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the second appeals holding that the suit for partition challenging old registered sale and gift deeds was barred by limitation and the properties sold to third parties ceased to be joint family property.
Agya Singh v. Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court held that used gold jewellery worn by a passenger is exempt as personal effects under the Baggage Rules and set aside unlawful detention by Customs for failure to issue Show Cause Notice within the statutory period.
CDR Yogesh Mahla v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of the petitioner's challenge to a show cause notice issued for sexual harassment, holding that no appeal lies to the Armed Forces Tribunal against ICC recommendations absent service rules, and that premature judicial interference at the show cause notice stage is unwarranted.
Anish Muralidhar v. Susanta Kar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of sound health at entry and the employer's burden to disprove service connection under the Military Pension Rules.
Mrityunjay v. Rajesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II, holding that the employer must prove non-attribution to service and that the court's certiorari jurisdiction is limited.
Ramesh Chander v. The Director General ESI Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a fresh recruit appointed after 2004 under the New Pension Scheme cannot claim pension benefits under the Old Pension Scheme by counting prior daily wage service absent specific regulations adopting DoPT Circulars.