Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Kausal Goyal and Ors. v. Awadh Oils Private Limited
The Delhi High Court directed the Commercial Court to rehear the interim injunction application afresh without being influenced by the impugned order, keeping all parties' rights open and dismissed the appeal.
Sangeeta Patel & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court transferred a writ petition concerning Physiotherapists' service matters to the Central Administrative Tribunal, recognizing the Tribunal's exclusive jurisdiction under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.
M/S. TRANS INDIA LOGISTICS v. GSTO, WARD-60 & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order due to improper notice on the GST portal and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after affording the petitioner a fair hearing, while leaving the validity of extension notifications to the Supreme Court.
Jagan Deep Sandhu v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 61 Zone 5
The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand orders due to defective service of Show Cause Notices and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after affording the petitioner a fair opportunity to be heard, while leaving the validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
Arvind Kumar @ Gaurav v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant in a POCSO sexual assault case due to failure of prosecution to establish foundational facts and conclusive identification, thereby negating the statutory presumption of guilt under Section 29 of the POCSO Act.
Aarti Mangla Aggarwal v. Commissioner of Customs New Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that show cause notices issued within limitation under Section 110 of the Customs Act, 1962 are valid and directed the Customs Department to hear petitioners willing to pay duty before passing orders on seized gold chains.
Manoj Plastic v. The Govt of NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court dismissed writ petition challenging GST time extension notifications, directing petitioner to file appeal with pre-deposit, pending Supreme Court's final ruling on notification validity.
TARA INTERNATIONAL v. DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE (DRI)
The Delhi High Court upheld the jurisdiction of DRI officials to issue show cause notices under Section 28 of the Customs Act and held that pre-notice consultation is not mandatory for notices under Section 28(4), dismissing the writ petition and directing the petitioner to file appeal before CESTAT.
M/S NEW ALLIED LPG APPLIANCES v. SALES TAX OFFICER CLASS II/AVATO, WARD 79 & ORS
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order due to improper service of notice and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after affording the petitioner a fair opportunity to be heard, while leaving the validity of related GST notifications to the Supreme Court.
Nurgozel Achilova v. Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court held that used jewellery worn by a foreign tourist is a personal effect exempt from confiscation, and that confiscation without proper show cause notice and hearing under Section 124 of the Customs Act is unlawful.
Ram Beer Bohra v. The State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging refusal to register FIR in an unnatural death case, holding no immediate police investigation was warranted on the material before the court.
Impresario Entertainment and Hospitality Private Limited v. The Registrar of Trademarks
The Delhi High Court set aside the Registrar's order rejecting a trademark application for violation of natural justice and remanded the matter for fresh hearing and consideration.
Puran Kumar Chug and Anr v. Raghbir Since Deceased Through Lrs and Ors
The High Court held that revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interlocutory orders such as those allowing impleadment under Order I Rule 10 CPC, and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Surender Kumar Sharma and Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the right of authorized vendors to continue holding the weekly market at the approved site and directed municipal authorities to regulate violations without discontinuing the market arbitrarily.
Anil Kumar & Anr. v. Devender Kumar Garg @ Davinder Kumar
The Delhi High Court held that revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interim orders that do not finally dispose of the suit, dismissing the petition accordingly.
Ranvijay Rai v. Ravindra Kumar Tiwari and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the motor accident claim appeal for non-deposit of the statutory amount as mandated under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
RTDC Ltd. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Rohen Trehan
The Delhi High Court set aside the discharge of a company director in a Section 138/141 NI Act case, holding that directors in a two-director company are presumed responsible for company affairs and that discharge applications under Section 251 CrPC are not maintainable in summons trials.
Nishrin Saifudin Akolawala v. Savitri Telecom Services; Juzer Bharmal v. Savitri Telecom Services
The Delhi High Court held that directors can be held liable under Section 141 NI Act only if specifically shown to be responsible for the company's affairs, quashing summons against one director lacking such involvement while upholding summons against another with prima facie evidence.
Aditya Rai Gupta v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed a conviction under the DPDP Act due to denial of fair trial rights and ordered a fresh trial, holding that a writ petition is maintainable when appeal is barred by petty sentence provisions.
Sahib Sital Singh Bajwa & Ors. v. Aakash Educational Services Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award confirming termination of a franchise agreement and dues payable, holding that judicial interference in arbitration awards is limited and the award was passed within the extended limitation period including COVID-19 exclusion.