Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Sh. Yogender & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and related IPC provisions following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, emphasizing the Court's power to end criminal proceedings to prevent abuse of process.
Rajesh Kumar & Others v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.
Devesh & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, emphasizing the Court's power to end criminal proceedings in the interest of justice.
Karan Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 498A IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Balram Dhibar & Anr. v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 420 IPC based on a genuine compromise between parties, emphasizing the court's power to end criminal proceedings to secure the ends of justice.
Chandan Verma & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, emphasizing the court's power to end criminal proceedings to prevent abuse of process.
Manish@Lulu v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner's furlough application despite past minor delays in surrender, emphasizing reformation and reasonable explanations.
Chhail Bihari and Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court refused to quash an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC despite alleged settlement, emphasizing that withdrawal of a related Section 306 IPC complaint by the deceased's family amounts to abuse of process and that the welfare of minor children must be protected.
Satyam Chauhan v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of an accused charged under Section 69 BNS for sexual exploitation under false promise of marriage, finding no change in circumstances and noting attempts to fabricate defense.
Anita v. State NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail granted to a woman accused of cheating in a property dispute arising from civil litigation, where forensic evidence was inconclusive and investigation incomplete.
Hussain Ahmed v. State (NCT) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction and sentence for robbery with use of a deadly weapon under Sections 394, 397 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act, rejecting his plea for sentence reduction.
Smita Jina v. Amit Kumar Jina
The Delhi High Court upheld a Family Court order granting partition of jointly owned matrimonial property, holding that the right to reside under the PWDV Act does not bar partition proceedings based on admitted co-ownership.
Ram Narayan v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against an elderly petitioner for accidental death under Sections 289 and 106(1) of BNSS, relying on voluntary settlement and absence of criminal intent.
Indo Global Social Service Society v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that industrial disputes involving a registered society fall under the jurisdiction of the State Government, setting aside a reference order directing adjudication by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal.
Bank of Baroda v. Union of India Ministry of Finance & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a Recovery Officer conducting an auction beyond pecuniary jurisdiction as per Government notification acts without jurisdiction, ordering refund of amounts with interest and transfer of the matter to the correct Tribunal.
Munish Grover v. Container Corporation India Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the transfer of an employee by CONCOR, holding that transfers are administrative decisions not subject to judicial interference absent mala fides or statutory violation.
Manish v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for robbery under Sections 392/34 IPC read with Section 397 IPC based on consistent and corroborated prosecution evidence despite absence of independent public witnesses.
Mohd. Islam v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for rape and related offences based on consistent prosecutrix testimony and medical evidence despite absence of semen or injuries, dismissing the appellant's claim of false implication.
L AND D JV v. CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award rejecting claims for extra work and interest on delayed payments, holding no patent illegality or perversity in the award and dismissing the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
ABL Workspaces Private Limited v. Vinod Kundra and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Arbitrator’s interim order directing the tenant to furnish a fixed deposit, emphasizing limited judicial interference under the Arbitration Act and the tenant’s precarious financial position.