Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Shriram EPC Ltd. v. Parker-Hannifin India Pvt. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court upheld the arbitral award and arbitration clause, holding that the Petitioner was liable to procure the Letter of Credit under the Supply Agreement, CIAL and APL were not necessary parties, and the award did not warrant interference.
Sachin Malpani v. Nilam Patil
The Bombay High Court upheld that maintenance charges in a condominium must be levied proportionate to the undivided interest in common areas as per the Apartment Act and the registered Deed of Declaration, affirming the Deputy Registrar's jurisdiction and dismissing the petitioners' challenge.
Metro Cash & Carry India Private Limited v. Maharashtra Pollution Control Board
The Bombay High Court held that payment of compounding charges under the Maharashtra Non-biodegradable Garbage (Control) Act does not amount to a court conviction, and thus prosecution for a third offence under enhanced penalty provisions was not maintainable, quashing the issuance of process against the applicants.
Sanjay Kishin Shahani v. Satbir S. Narang & Ors.
The High Court held that appellate courts must give reasoned orders when imposing or waiving the mandatory 20% compensation deposit under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
Jai Karan Singh v. DG CISF
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondents to consider the petitioner’s transfer request as a representation under the existing policy and communicate the decision within four weeks.
Manvi Hora v. Abhinav Batra
The Delhi High Court upheld the appointment of a Local Commissioner for recording evidence in a divorce proceeding, dismissed the petition to record evidence before the Family Court, but allowed the petitioner an opportunity to cross-examine her husband and directed compliance with child interaction orders.
M/S OM CROP SCIENCE v. CRYSTAL CROP PROTECTION LTD
The Delhi High Court held that an immovable property exempt under Section 60(c) CPC cannot be attached in execution proceedings and directed the petitioner to seek recall of the attachment warrant before the Executing Court.
Ravinder Kumar Luthra v. Election Commission of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging a transfer order by directing the Central Administrative Tribunal to decide the related OA expeditiously and restrained the respondents from implementing the transfer until then.
Harshi v. Anita Gupta
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to adduce additional evidence at the appellate stage under Section 391 CrPC due to counsel's oversight in summoning a key witness, emphasizing the need to prevent miscarriage of justice.
Shri Ram Niwas Pal v. Chander Fula
The Delhi High Court held that a writ petition challenging an Employees Compensation Award is not maintainable when an alternative statutory appeal under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 is available.
Gulvinder Khatri v. Pooja Adhikari & Ors.
The High Court upheld the trial and revisional courts' refusal to take cognizance against a public servant in absence of prior sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C., emphasizing judicial caution and statutory safeguards in prosecuting officials.
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Maya & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the compensation award based on credible employer testimony of the deceased's salary and recognized the deceased's aged father as a dependent, dismissing the insurance company's appeal.
Kawal Mahajan v. Unitech Fibres Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Commercial Court's dismissal of a suit for recovery of payment, holding that acceptance of debit notes and failure to timely dispute claims of short supply or defects precluded recovery.
Asahi India Glass Pvt Ltd v. Advantage India Logistics Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting damages for loss of profit due to termination of transportation agreements without mandatory 30-day notice, emphasizing limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
CRODA INC v. THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS
The Delhi High Court allowed the patent applicant's appeal and remanded the matter for fresh consideration after holding that reliance on undisclosed prior art in the refusal order violated natural justice.
Chandan Prajapati; Shailendra Kumar Mishra; Falguni Rai v. Jitendra Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order deeming the employee's voluntary retirement effective after three months due to the employer's failure to refuse within the prescribed period, rejecting the employer's contention that disciplinary penalties barred retirement.
M/S Satya Parkash and Brothers (P) Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of an arbitral award on the ground that a sole arbitrator appointed unilaterally by one party, ineligible under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration Act, violates public policy and cannot be waived except by express written agreement after dispute arises.
Shri Pankaj Aggarwal v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the disciplinary removal order and CAT dismissal for lack of reasons, discriminatory penalty, and failure to consider the petitioner’s criminal acquittal, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
Staff Selection Commission & Anr. v. Pankaj Shakya
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order directing a fresh medical examination, upholding consistent medical findings that the respondent was unfit due to carrying angle exceeding prescribed limits.
Pushpendra v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to challenge the impugned order before the Tribunal and suggested expeditious disposal of the matter.