Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Sardar Sarabjit Singh Bedi v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted Letters of Administration to the petitioner for the estate of the deceased under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, affirming that such grant authorizes estate administration but does not confer ownership.
Banwarilal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a BSF constable for assisting cattle smugglers, ruling that judicial interference in disciplinary proceedings is limited to cases of manifest perversity or procedural violations.
Neha Dutta v. Commissioner of Police
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking FIR registration against police officials, holding that alternate remedies under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. must be exhausted before approaching the High Court.
H D F C ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. RAMJI & ORS
The Delhi High Court upheld motor accident compensation awards, holding the insurer liable due to failure to prove violation of insurance policy by producing vehicle permit or proof of legal notice service.
Tata 1MG Healthcare Solutions Private Limited v. QRG Medicare Limited
The Delhi High Court held that at the stage of appointing an arbitrator under Section 11, judicial scrutiny is limited to prima facie existence of the arbitration agreement and appointed a sole arbitrator accordingly, leaving merits and frivolity issues to the arbitral tribunal.
Tata 1Mg Healthcare Solutions Private Limited v. North East Health Care Private Limited
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, judicial scrutiny is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes under the collaboration agreement.
Tata 1MG Healthcare Solutions Private Limited v. Marengo Asia Healthcare Private Limited
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, judicial scrutiny is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes under the Collaboration Agreement.
Azad Market RWA (Regd.) v. Mamta Yadav
Delhi High Court dismissed petitions filed by Azad Market RWA for unauthorized construction due to abuse of process, suppression of facts, and lack of locus standi, imposing costs and referring counsel for disciplinary action.
Pani Ram v. Mohan Lal Joshi
The Delhi High Court held that in a Section 138 N.I. Act complaint, issuance of notice under Section 223 B.N.S.S. before examining the complainant is valid as the affidavit filed suffices as evidence at the pre-cognizance stage.
PROGNOSYS MEDICAL SYSTEMS PRIVATE LTD v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging tender conditions, holding that an unsuccessful bidder who withdrew and was disqualified without timely challenge cannot later question the tender process at an advanced stage.
Bela Dalmia & Anr. v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court quashed a municipal property tax assessment order due to a 14-year delay in adjudication, holding such delay unreasonable and allowing fresh reassessment under the NDMC Act.
M/S Nakoda Food Marketing & Ors. v. M/S Mahesh Edible Oil Industries Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to vary the injunction restraining the appellants from using the trademark "SALONI" in Class 30 after they obtained registration, holding that co-existing registered proprietors may use identical marks in their respective classes without infringement.
Manoj Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to furnish one consolidated surety for 21 pending cheque bounce cases under Section 138 NI Act, holding that excessive bail conditions defeating liberty can be modified under inherent powers of the court.
Sandeep v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that concurrence between the Detailed Medical Examination and Appeal Medical Board findings conclusively determines medical fitness, denying the petitioner a fresh medical examination despite a contrary independent medical opinion.
M/S VAIDYA RISHI INDIA HEALTH PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. v. SURESH DUTT PARASHAR & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that no infringement action lies between registered proprietors of identical or similar trademarks in their registered classes, setting aside an injunction granted solely on infringement grounds.
Union of India v. Raj Bala
The Delhi High Court held that pensionary benefits cannot be withheld from an employee on the ground of non-transfer of pro-rata pension by the previous employer and directed immediate release of pension with interest.
Saurabh Kumar Mallick v. Union of India & Anr.
The High Court held that an appeal against a show cause memorandum praying for revocation of suspension must be treated as an appeal against the suspension order and directed the authority to decide it within two weeks.
Roshan Lal Saini v. Union of India and Ors
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging rejection of appointment under the withdrawn LARSGESS Scheme, holding no vested right arises from a discontinued government scheme.
M/S PROVIEW CONSTRUCTION LTD v. MS. SURIYA NAHEED
The Delhi High Court held that it will not interfere under Article 227 with concurrent findings of fact by consumer fora absent patent illegality or perversity, dismissing the petition challenging refund amount in a deficiency of service complaint.
M/S INTEC CAPITAL LTD. v. FRONTLINE RETAIL INDIA PVT. LTD. & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitration clause providing for unilateral appointment of an arbitrator is not void ab initio and allowed the appeal setting aside the dismissal of the Section 9 petition seeking interim relief.