Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/S LAULS PVT LIMITED v. SMT GEETA & ORS
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte decree for non-production of documents due to sufficient cause including COVID-19 disruptions, remanding the matter for limited adjudication on insurance policy breach and recovery rights.
M/S ELEMENTTO LIFESTYLES v. MR. DEEPAK SINGH BORA
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte Labour Court award of reinstatement with full back wages for lack of reasoned findings and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication applying settled principles on workman status and back wages.
M/S S.P. Electronics and Battery Products v. Mukesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte labour award due to lack of notice and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication ensuring compliance with natural justice.
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI v. NAGARJUNA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award holding that disputes on responsibility for delay are arbitrable and decisions on quantum of compensation alone are final under the contract.
State v. Reena
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's lenient sentence for possession of intermediate quantity of ganja, emphasizing mitigating factors and the accused's voluntary plea of guilt.
B. G. Shirke Construction Technology Pvt. Ltd. v. Army Welfare Housing Organisation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award applying a revised minimum wage rate published prior to tender submission for price escalation, affirming the limited scope of judicial interference under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act.
M/S KING DORIAN EXPORTS v. DUDH NAAT
The Delhi High Court allowed setting aside of an ex parte labour award for non-service of notice, subject to full deposit of the awarded amount and costs, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
Kings Dorian Exports v. Irfan
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to set aside an ex parte labour award for non-service of notice, subject to depositing the full awarded amount and costs, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
Saroj & Ors. v. Axis E Corp Solutions Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the referral court’s role under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and that issues regarding non-signatories’ status must be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal.
Ravinder Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a government servant fully exonerated and reinstated is entitled to full pay and allowances for the dismissal period under FR 54(2), rejecting the 'no work no pay' principle in such cases.
Usha Devi and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking compassionate allowance to the family of a CISF officer removed from service for misconduct, holding that no special circumstances existed to grant pensionary benefits under Rule 41 of the CCS Pension Rules.
NDMC v. Vijay Laxmi
The Delhi High Court held that an employee is entitled to interest on delayed salary payments caused by employer's administrative lapses, setting aside the Tribunal's denial of interest on salary delay.
AXIS FINANCE LIMITED v. PADMANABHA PRASAD CHAKRADHARA VENKATA SANKA PROPRIETOR: LALITHA TRADERS
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that judicial scrutiny at this stage is limited to prima facie existence of the arbitration agreement without delving into the merits of the dispute.
AXIS FINANCE LIMITED v. NUTHAN PEREIRA
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that judicial scrutiny at this stage is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement without delving into merits or frivolity of claims.
Mohsin Khan v. State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of an application to recall witnesses for further cross-examination in a POCSO case, holding that vague and non-specific requests without material basis cannot justify recall under Section 348 of BNSS, 2023.
Shishu Pal Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a Magistrate lacking territorial jurisdiction must return the complaint to the proper court instead of dismissing it, and allowed the petitioner to re-present the complaint before the competent authority.
Jyoti Panchal and Anr. v. Deepak Panchal
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's interim maintenance order granting ₹8,000 per month each to the wife and her minor son, affirming the prima facie income assessment and stepfather's potential liability for maintenance.
Kartik v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's application for suspension of sentence in a sexual offence case involving a minor, affirming the primacy of school records for age determination and emphasizing strict standards for suspension in serious offences under the POCSO Act.
Md. Shahnawaz v. State GNCT
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for robbery and possession of stolen property but modified the sentence to the period already served considering mitigating factors.
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), GURUGRAM v. PANCHAM REALCON PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the ITAT's and CIT(A)'s findings that the assessee satisfactorily explained large cash deposits during demonetization, negating addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act.