Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
A.K. Basak v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court declined to direct police registration of a complaint in a neighbourly harassment dispute but ordered police to provide contact details for urgent assistance.
Pawan Dabas and Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi Through SHO & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement and the complainant's unwillingness to continue prosecution.
Sandeep Kumar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the accused alleged to have forcibly dispossessed the complainant and stolen property, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation and discouraging self-help remedies.
Anil Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court allowed parole for sixty days to a prisoner entitled to furlough, emphasizing the State’s prior stand and the urgency of attending post-death rituals.
Atul Tiwari v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a sexual offence case, holding that prima facie evidence indicated a consensual relationship and lack of corroboration on serious allegations.
Kubota Corporation v. Godabari Agro Machinery and Services India Private Limited & Ors.
Delhi High Court holds it has territorial jurisdiction over patent infringement suit based on offer for sale and delivery of impugned product within Delhi, dismissing defendant's application to return plaint.
Pankaj Yadav and Diskha Narula v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that preservation of electronic evidence including CDRs is necessary and desirable under section 91 Cr.P.C. to ensure a fair trial, overruling the magistrate's dismissal and balancing privacy concerns with procedural fairness.
Chetan Manchanda v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 377, 323, and 506 IPC following a full compromise and dissolution of marriage between the parties.
M/S LAULS PVT LIMITED v. SMT GEETA & ORS
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte decree for non-production of documents due to sufficient cause including COVID-19 disruptions, remanding the matter for limited adjudication on insurance policy breach and recovery rights.
M/S ELEMENTTO LIFESTYLES v. MR. DEEPAK SINGH BORA
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte Labour Court award of reinstatement with full back wages for lack of reasoned findings and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication applying settled principles on workman status and back wages.
M/S S.P. Electronics and Battery Products v. Mukesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte labour award due to lack of notice and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication ensuring compliance with natural justice.
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI v. NAGARJUNA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award holding that disputes on responsibility for delay are arbitrable and decisions on quantum of compensation alone are final under the contract.
State v. Reena
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's lenient sentence for possession of intermediate quantity of ganja, emphasizing mitigating factors and the accused's voluntary plea of guilt.
B. G. Shirke Construction Technology Pvt. Ltd. v. Army Welfare Housing Organisation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award applying a revised minimum wage rate published prior to tender submission for price escalation, affirming the limited scope of judicial interference under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act.
M/S KING DORIAN EXPORTS v. DUDH NAAT
The Delhi High Court allowed setting aside of an ex parte labour award for non-service of notice, subject to full deposit of the awarded amount and costs, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
Kings Dorian Exports v. Irfan
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to set aside an ex parte labour award for non-service of notice, subject to depositing the full awarded amount and costs, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
Saroj & Ors. v. Axis E Corp Solutions Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the referral court’s role under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and that issues regarding non-signatories’ status must be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal.
Ravinder Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a government servant fully exonerated and reinstated is entitled to full pay and allowances for the dismissal period under FR 54(2), rejecting the 'no work no pay' principle in such cases.
Usha Devi and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking compassionate allowance to the family of a CISF officer removed from service for misconduct, holding that no special circumstances existed to grant pensionary benefits under Rule 41 of the CCS Pension Rules.
NDMC v. Vijay Laxmi
The Delhi High Court held that an employee is entitled to interest on delayed salary payments caused by employer's administrative lapses, setting aside the Tribunal's denial of interest on salary delay.