Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
AXIS FINANCE LIMITED v. PADMANABHA PRASAD CHAKRADHARA VENKATA SANKA PROPRIETOR: LALITHA TRADERS
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that judicial scrutiny at this stage is limited to prima facie existence of the arbitration agreement without delving into the merits of the dispute.
AXIS FINANCE LIMITED v. NUTHAN PEREIRA
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that judicial scrutiny at this stage is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement without delving into merits or frivolity of claims.
Mohsin Khan v. State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of an application to recall witnesses for further cross-examination in a POCSO case, holding that vague and non-specific requests without material basis cannot justify recall under Section 348 of BNSS, 2023.
Shishu Pal Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a Magistrate lacking territorial jurisdiction must return the complaint to the proper court instead of dismissing it, and allowed the petitioner to re-present the complaint before the competent authority.
Jyoti Panchal and Anr. v. Deepak Panchal
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's interim maintenance order granting ₹8,000 per month each to the wife and her minor son, affirming the prima facie income assessment and stepfather's potential liability for maintenance.
Kartik v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's application for suspension of sentence in a sexual offence case involving a minor, affirming the primacy of school records for age determination and emphasizing strict standards for suspension in serious offences under the POCSO Act.
Md. Shahnawaz v. State GNCT
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for robbery and possession of stolen property but modified the sentence to the period already served considering mitigating factors.
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), GURUGRAM v. PANCHAM REALCON PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the ITAT's and CIT(A)'s findings that the assessee satisfactorily explained large cash deposits during demonetization, negating addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act.
Sunil Kumar v. The Director General- S.S.B
The Delhi High Court allowed correction of typographical errors in a judgment to accurately reflect the matrimonial case number in a divorce proceeding.
Sunil Kumar v. The Director General- S.S.B
The Delhi High Court held that contracting a second marriage after a binding ex parte divorce decree and before any appeal is not bigamy, quashing the petitioner’s removal from SSB service and ordering reinstatement.
Future Art and Display v. Sales Tax Officer Class II/AVATO, Ward 94 & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST notifications and adjudication order, allowing the petitioner to file appeal pending Supreme Court's decision on notification validity.
Aalim v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging unauthorized construction by an unrelated petitioner, condemning misuse of judicial process for extortion and directing police investigation into multiple frivolous petitions concerning the same property.
Bakhtawar Ahmad Rather v. Airport Authority of India
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11(6) stage, the Court's role is limited to verifying the existence of an arbitration agreement and limitation compliance, leaving substantive issues like time barring and accord and satisfaction to the arbitral tribunal, and accordingly appointed the sole arbitrator.
Rajiv Kumar Soni v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to a petitioner falsely implicated in gold theft, holding that custodial interrogation is not mandatory and bail should be granted if the accused satisfies the triple test and cooperates with investigation.
Khushbu v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking FIR registration and independent investigation, holding that statutory remedies exist and the dispute is essentially civil, making the writ petition an inappropriate remedy.
Head Const Prakash Chand v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to re-approach if the Show Cause Notice under BSF Rules results in an adverse decision.
Alkesh Tacker HUF v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the GST refund claim of the petitioner, holding that refund cannot be rejected on the ground of late filing of LUT when it was executed prior to exports and all documents were duly submitted.
Union of India v. Prakash Pant & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT order quashing seniority lists from 2015-2018, remanding for fresh consideration of compliance with Supreme Court precedents and limitation, clarifying the effect of prospective overruling on settled seniority.
Mr. Manish v. Shakuntala Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order directing full reimbursement of COVID-19 medical expenses to the patient despite hospital charges exceeding government-fixed rates, leaving the petitioner to address overcharging with the hospital separately.
Union of India v. Rajesh Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s order granting financial upgradation under the MACP scheme by holding that merger of posts negates earlier promotions for ACP benefits.