Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Rajasthan State v. Gurbachan Singh and Others
The Supreme Court restored the murder conviction of Gurbachan Singh under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, holding that he shared common intention with co-accused to cause death, overturning the High Court's acquittal.
The State of Rajasthan v. Gurbachan Singh & Others
The Supreme Court held that Gurbachan Singh shared common intention with co-accused in the murder of Teja Singh and restored his conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, overturning the High Court's acquittal on that count.
Uttar Pradesh State v. Rajmati Singh
The Supreme Court held that a decades-old service reinstatement claim barred by limitation and abandonment cannot be allowed, setting aside the High Court's order and dismissing the petitioner's claim while awarding compensation.
The State of Uttar Pradesh v. Rajmati Singh
The Supreme Court held that a belated service claim after over three decades is barred by delay, laches, and limitation, and rejected reinstatement and arrears, awarding only lump-sum compensation.
Uttar Pradesh State v. Rajmati Singh
The Supreme Court held that a long-delayed claim for reinstatement and service benefits is barred by limitation and set aside the High Court's order directing reinstatement, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation and administrative discipline.
The State of Uttar Pradesh v. Rajmati Singh
The Supreme Court held that a belated service claim after over three decades is barred by limitation and laches, setting aside the High Court's order reinstating the employee and awarding arrears.
Rajasthan State v. Gurbachan Singh & Ors.
The Supreme Court restored Gurbachan Singh's murder conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, holding that he shared common intention with co-accused despite limited individual role.
Babuji Sahu v. The State (Govt. of NCT Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted interim bail on medical grounds to an accused suffering from advanced piles, subject to strict conditions to ensure trial attendance and prevent interference.
Arushi Setia @ Arushi Sethia v. State (GNCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 338 IPC based on an amicable settlement and the complainant's voluntary no-objection statement.
ADM Agro Industries Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1-1, Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2014-15 due to non-application of mind and remitted the matter for de novo consideration with directions for personal hearing.
Aditya Chaturvedi v. State GNCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 509 IPC based on an amicable settlement between neighbors, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Tewatia Construction Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that claims challenging breach and liability for delay under a contract's compensation clause are arbitrable and must be referred to the appointed arbitrator, limiting judicial interference at the pre-reference stage.
Bharat & Anr. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the State to provide security to petitioners facing threats from relatives, affirming the State's duty to protect life and liberty under Article 21.
Kuldeep Singh v. Kishan Kumar Since Deceased Through LRs and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Article 227 seeking modification of a settled judgment on government land, holding the issue conclusively decided by prior courts including the Supreme Court.
CPL Rohtash Singh Sahrawat v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and decide the petitioner's claim for pension and retiral benefits within eight weeks, emphasizing procedural compliance before judicial relief.
Ananya Singh v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the University's admission policy denying participation in Spot Round counseling to candidates admitted in regular rounds without withdrawal, emphasizing judicial restraint in academic matters and adherence to merit-based procedures.
UV ASSEST RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that an asset reconstruction company acquiring pledged shares under the SARFAESI Act is entitled to be recognized as the new pledgee by the depository, notwithstanding procedural gaps in the Depositories Act or SEBI regulations.
Sanjana v. Lt. Governor, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging eviction of a commercial shop occupant in a JJR colony, holding that conversion policies apply only to residential plots and original allottees, and eviction under the DUSIB Act was valid.
GENIE INFO SOLUTIONS LLP v. BECKTON DICKNISON INDIA PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Arbitral Award, holding that the Court cannot re-appreciate evidence and the petitioner failed to prove its claim with cogent evidence.
M/S Madan Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that recovery orders under Section 33-C(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act require a pre-existing award or settlement and that the appropriate government cannot assume adjudicatory powers, quashing recovery orders issued without such foundation.