Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Amit Kumar v. State GNCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking recall of the complainant for cross-examination under Section 311 CrPC, holding that the trial court's discretion and the petitioner's delay did not warrant interference under Section 482 CrPC.
The State of Maharashtra v. Bharat Constructions
The Bombay High Court upheld the majority arbitral award granting compensation for delay in a construction contract, emphasizing the limited scope of judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Stoughton Street Tech Labs Pvt. Ltd. v. Godlike Esports Pvt. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the Plaintiff’s interim application enforcing a determinable Collaboration Agreement in an e-sports dispute, holding no concluded contract was proved and negative covenants unenforceable against non-parties.
Shri Sadanand Raghunath Gharat v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court upheld dismissal of a government employee for obtaining appointment by fraudulently claiming Scheduled Tribe status, holding that fraudulent appointments are void and disciplinary action can be taken even after decades.
Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Limited v. Orbit Motels and Inns Private Limited
The Supreme Court held that possession of land allotted to Metro for a public project is lawful despite pending civil litigation, and writ jurisdiction cannot be used to stall such possession.
Sudesh Chhikara v. Ramti Devi
The Supreme Court held that a property transfer by a senior citizen can be declared void under Section 23(1) of the 2007 Act only if it was made subject to a condition of maintenance which the transferee failed to fulfill, and set aside orders invalidating a release deed lacking such condition.
Anjali v. Lokendra Rathod
The Supreme Court held that Income Tax Returns must be relied upon for income estimation in motor accident claims, fixed appropriate deductions and future prospects, enhanced conventional heads, and awarded compensation with 9% interest, modifying the High Court’s award accordingly.
Anjali v. Lokendra Rathod
The Supreme Court held that Income Tax Returns must be relied upon for income determination in motor accident claims, adjusted deductions and future prospects apply, and awarded enhanced compensation with 9% interest.
Parvesh & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, safeguarding the minor child's rights.
Mitthan Lal & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR alleging assault, holding that the disputed compromise was not voluntary and the inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be exercised cautiously.
Hans Raj v. BSES Yamuna Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an electricity bill raised for unauthorized load usage and meter tampering, holding that the appellant failed to disprove the respondent's cogent inspection report and evidence.
Sunny Jain v. The Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that blocking Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A CGST Rules solely for non-payment to supplier within 180 days is unlawful and directed immediate unblocking of the ITC.
Sheena Jain v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following reconciliation between the parties, emphasizing the court's power to prevent abuse of process and maintain matrimonial harmony.
Ravinder Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR involving copyright and trademark offences based on a voluntary settlement between parties, subject to payment to the Prime Minister's Relief Fund.
Rajeev Sharma v. Pallavi Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's assessment of husband's income and maintenance order, dismissing appeals and directing payment of arrears with liberty for future enhancement upon new evidence.
Power Infrastructure India v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that limitation for filing appeals before the NCLAT is computed from the date of physical filing as per NCLAT Rules, leaving the question of limitation to be decided by the NCLAT itself.
Steward Gulshan Kumar & Ors. v. The Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioners' representation for creation of promotional posts and promotions in accordance with the Supreme Court's binding judgment in State of Tripura & Ors. v. Sri K.K. Roy.
Prabhjot Singh v. State of GNCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the SDM to decide the petitioner's application for extension of moneylending license area to New Delhi within three months, emphasizing timely and reasoned administrative action under the Punjab Registration of Money Lenders Act, 1938.
HYATT INDIA CONSULTANCY PVT LTD ..... Petitioner v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....
The Delhi High Court held that requiring an active IEC at the time of rendering services to claim SEIS benefits is ultra vires the FTDR Act and directed fresh consideration of claims in light of a government amendment clarifying IEC necessity only at benefit claim stage.
M/S. KIZHAKKETHALAKKAL ROCKS v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court held that the Central Expert Appraisal Committee may transfer mining lease proposals to the State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority after its constitution under exceptional circumstances, allowing the SEIAA to proceed with appraisal despite pending litigation.