Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Uttar Pradesh State v. Priyanka
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's grant of death-cum-retirement gratuity to the heirs of a deceased employee who died before exercising the retirement option under government rules.
Uttar Pradesh State v. Priyanka
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order granting death-cum-retirement gratuity to the widow of a deceased government employee who died before exercising the retirement option introduced by a subsequent government order.
State of U.P. and Ors. v. Priyanka
The Supreme Court upheld the entitlement of the deceased employee's heirs to death-cum-retirement gratuity despite the employee not having exercised the mandatory retirement option before his death.
Uttar Pradesh State v. Priyanka
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order directing payment of death-cum-retirement gratuity to the widow of a deceased employee who died before exercising the retirement option, emphasizing the beneficial nature of the scheme.
Uttar Pradesh State v. Priyanka
The Supreme Court upheld the entitlement of the widow to death-cum-retirement gratuity despite the deceased employee dying before exercising retirement at 60 years, affirming the benevolent nature of the gratuity scheme.
State of U.P. and Ors. v. Priyanka
The Supreme Court upheld the entitlement of the deceased employee’s heirs to death-cum-retirement gratuity despite the employee not having exercised the mandatory retirement option before death.
F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG & Anr. v. Natco Pharma Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the finding that the patent for Risdiplam is prima facie obvious over prior art genus patents, thereby justifying refusal of interlocutory injunction in the infringement suit.
Lal Vedant Nath Shah Deo v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner charged under the NDPS Act and IPC, holding that in absence of recovery from him and with only co-accused disclosures and financial transactions as evidence, bail should be granted on general principles.
Dharmender Gautam & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from a family dispute under Sections 354, 354(B), 324, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
JK Construction Co. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the rejection of a contractor's bid for non-compliance with tender vehicle specifications, affirming limited judicial interference in tender decisions absent arbitrariness.
Novateur Electrical & Digital Systems Pvt Ltd v. V-Guard Industries Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that a counter claim for cancellation of registered designs is maintainable before the civil court in a piracy suit under the Designs Act, 2000, following the Supreme Court's ruling in S.D. Containers.
Monk Estates Private Limited & Anr. v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court ordered investigation into missing land registration records, conversion of a non-cognizable report into an FIR, and reconstruction of lost records based on certified copies, emphasizing authorities' duty to safeguard land records.
Amit Kumar v. Punjab National Bank and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging dismissal from service, directing the petitioner to exhaust the statutory appeal remedy under Punjab National Bank Regulations within an extended time.
ALPHA INFOLAB PVT LTD v. NATIONAL INTERNET EXCHANGE OF INDIA AND ANR
Delhi High Court held that termination of distributorship on vague national security grounds without prior notice violates natural justice and directed issuance of a show cause notice with opportunity to respond.
Madan v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Section 307 IPC but reduced the sentence to the period already served, considering the long delay and appellant's circumstances.
M/S AIRPETS RELOCATION SERVICES (P) LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court held that pet owners alone are legally accountable for pet import/export formalities, and authorized representatives may act on their behalf as per the Office Memorandum dated 15th July, 2020, dismissing the petition challenging earlier restrictive guidelines.
Ritu Johari v. Vineet Taneja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Respondent's application to modify the order appointing child counsellors and refused to postpone the Family Court hearing, emphasizing expeditious adjudication in the long-pending guardianship matter.
TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. KRISHAN LAL GUPTA & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal and upheld the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal's award of compensation to the deceased's family, rejecting the insurer's plea of collusion and affirming liability despite the driver being the deceased's son.
Rajat Enterprises v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside a debarment order against a contractor for failure to comply with natural justice and for issuing an order beyond the scope of the show cause notice.
Anil Kumar v. High Court of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking re-evaluation and rounding off of marks in the Delhi Higher Judicial Services Examination, holding that the rules expressly prohibit such relief and no material error was shown.