Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Jagesh Bhadra Kumar Savjani v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court quashed show cause notices and order under Section 179 of the Income Tax Act for failure to disclose mandatory jurisdictional facts regarding recovery efforts from the company before proceeding against its Director.
Lakhpatrai Agarwal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
The Bombay High Court held that the limitation period for fresh assessment under Section 153(3) starts upon receipt of the ITAT order by the Commissioner, and directed refund of tax and return of seized jewellery due to respondents' failure to comply within the prescribed time.
Rakesh @ Bhaiya Shambhuprasad Gupta v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence despite minor discrepancies and investigation lapses.
Nashik Zilla Sarkari & Parishad Karmachari Sahakari Bank Niyamit Ltd. v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld the jurisdiction of the State Co-operative Election Authority to exclude retired employees from voters lists of salary earners’ co-operative credit societies, affirming that retired employees can only be nominal members without voting rights under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.
Sardar Syed Taher Saifuddin v. Maharashtra State
The Supreme Court held that while the Jati Banishkar Act was unconstitutional for infringing religious community rights under Article 26(b), the practice of caste excommunication must be balanced against fundamental rights, necessitating reconsideration by a larger bench.
Daudi Bohra Samaj Central Board v. Maharashtra State
The Supreme Court held that the constitutional validity of caste excommunication as a religious practice under Article 26(b) requires reconsideration by a larger bench in light of constitutional morality and fundamental rights.
Central Board of Dawoodi Bohra Community v. The State of Maharashtra
The Supreme Court held that the constitutional protection of ex-communication under Article 26(b) is subject to constitutional morality and other fundamental rights, requiring reconsideration of the 1962 decision in light of evolved constitutional principles.
राज्य राजधानी दिल्ली सरकार v. सुशील कुमार गुप्ता
The Supreme Court held that under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act, acquisition lapses only if both possession is not taken and compensation is not paid, overruling earlier contrary precedent and allowing the government's appeal.
Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Sushil Kumar Gupta
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession has been taken, even if compensation remains unpaid, overruling earlier contrary precedents.
Rajasthan Government v. Sushil Kumar Gupta & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that unauthorized possession of land taken before the 2013 Act without payment of compensation does not amount to deemed acquisition under Section 24(2) of the Act, overruling earlier contrary precedent.
Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Sushil Kumar Gupta
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession has been taken, even if compensation was not paid, overruling earlier contrary precedent.
Bar Council of India v. Bonnie Foi Law College & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that the Bar Council of India has the statutory authority to prescribe pre-enrolment and post-enrolment bar examinations under the Advocates Act, overruling the earlier V. Sudeer decision and validating the All India Bar Examination regime.
Bar Council of India v. Bonnie Foi Law College & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that the Bar Council of India has the statutory authority to prescribe pre-enrolment examinations for advocates, overruling the earlier V. Sudeer judgment and affirming the validity of the All India Bar Examination.
Gas Point Petroleum India Limited v. Rajendra Marothi
The Supreme Court held that non-compliance with mandatory deposit rules in execution sales and prior ownership of the property invalidate the auction sale, allowing the appeal and setting aside the High Court's order.
Gas Point Petroleum India Limited v. Rajendra Marothi
The Supreme Court held that non-compliance with mandatory deposit requirements under Order 21 Rules 84 and 85 CPC and prior ownership of the property invalidated the auction sale in execution proceedings.
State of Haryana v. Subhash Chander
The Supreme Court partly allowed the State's appeal by reducing the enhanced land acquisition compensation from Rs. 2.98 crore to Rs. 2.88 crore per acre, holding that a 10% cumulative increase over the 2008 base compensation is just and supported by market evidence.
State of Haryana v. Subhash Chander
The Supreme Court partly allowed the State's appeal by reducing the enhanced land acquisition compensation awarded by the High Court from Rs. 2.98 crore to Rs. 2.88 crore per acre, applying a 10% cumulative increase on the 2008 valuation as just compensation.
राष्ट्रीय वैद्यकीय आयोग v. अण्णासाहेब चुडामर् िाटीि मेमोररयि वैद्यकीय महानवद्यािय
The Supreme Court allowed continuation of 100 MBBS admissions for 2021-22 at a medical college subject to a Rs. 2.5 crore deposit, upholding regulatory authority to withdraw increased seat permissions due to infrastructural deficiencies.
राष्ट्रीय वैद्यकीय आयोग v. अण्णासाहेब चुडामर् िाटीि मेमोररयि वैद्यकीय महानवद्यािय
The Supreme Court upheld the National Medical Commission's withdrawal of approval for increased MBBS intake at a medical college due to serious deficiencies, restricting admissions to 100 seats with conditions to protect students' interests.
National Medical Commission v. Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial Medical College
The Supreme Court upheld the withdrawal of increased intake permission for a medical college due to deficiencies, stayed the High Court's order permitting admissions, but conditionally allowed 100 admissions already made subject to a penalty deposit.