Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Bharath Singarappa v. Union Public Service Commission & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a valid OBC Non-Creamy Layer certificate issued outside the stipulated period cannot be a ground for disqualification in CAPF recruitment, upholding the petitioner's right to appointment in accordance with merit.
Union of India & Ors. v. Anand Kumar Dwivedi
The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension to a retired Air Force personnel, holding that the administration bears the burden to prove non-attribution of disability under the Entitlement Rules, 2008.
M/S MHJ METALTECHS PVT LTD v. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 16(1), DELHI
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a reassessment notice under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, holding that the information provided was sufficient and dismissal of the petition challenging the proceedings.
Sachin & Anr. v. Canara Bank
The Delhi High Court disposed of a commercial appeal following a lawful and enforceable settlement agreement reached through court mediation.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. M/S Ram Niwas Goel
The Delhi High Court dismissed the MCD's appeal and upheld the decree for payment of admitted Running Account Bills with interest, emphasizing that payment cannot be withheld once bills are admitted and passed.
Gaurav Kumar and Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi through SHO Crime Women Cell & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Rohit Dhingra & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the basis of a compromise and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Aryan Bagga v. The State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 279 IPC following an amicable settlement and compensation paid to the injured party, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Subhash Chand alias Subhash Chander and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a matrimonial dispute based on a bona fide compromise between the parties under its inherent powers.
Satender Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for parole as the petitioner had already been granted furlough which he had not availed, directing compliance with procedural formalities.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -Central -1 v. Sperry Plast Ltd.
The High Court upheld the ITAT's finding that loans taken and repaid within a short period were genuine, dismissing the tax department's appeal under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Hanumant Lal Patel v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging out-of-syllabus questions in the Civil Services Preliminary Examination, holding that judicial review cannot substitute expert academic judgment absent mala fide or arbitrariness.
Sahil Wajid v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld bail granted on the ground of non-supply of written grounds of arrest, dismissing the petition challenging it for suppression of facts and procedural irregularities.
M/S AGARWAL ASSOCIATES (PROMOTERS) LTD v. M/S SHARDA DEVELOPERS
The Delhi High Court held that interlocutory orders of an arbitral tribunal during ongoing arbitration are generally not subject to judicial interference under Article 227, and challenges must await the final award.
Ashok Kumar Singh v. Dhrub Prasad Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court’s procedural order to hear legal arguments before allowing evidence, holding that such interlocutory orders are not liable to interference under Article 227.
Ashok Kumar Singh & Ors. v. Dhrub Prasad Singh
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Trial Court’s procedural order to hear legal arguments before permitting evidence, holding no interference under Article 227 was warranted at this stage.
Navendu Agrawal v. Mrs Vartika Goyal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the imposition of nominal costs by the trial court for taking documents on record, holding no interference was warranted despite the petitioner's disability and financial claims.
Meenakshi Gupta v. Pooja Arora
The High Court granted the petitioner an additional opportunity to lead evidence subject to costs, while upholding the Trial Court's reasoned order dismissing the earlier application.
Sushila Somani v. Kiran Somany & Ors
The High Court set aside the trial court’s premature closure of the petitioner’s evidence and granted another opportunity to lead evidence under its supervisory jurisdiction.
DELHI MEDICAL TECHNICAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking pay parity for MCD Laboratory Technicians with Central Government counterparts, holding that differences in educational qualifications justify differential pay scales.