Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Mujahat Ali Khan v. Lokpal of India
The Delhi High Court quashed Lokpal orders and investigation against the petitioner for failure to afford mandatory hearing under Section 20(3) of the Lokpal Act before directing investigation.
Ramesh Kumar & Ors. v. Rajiv Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of tenants on the ground of bona fide requirement by a practicing advocate landlord, affirming the landlord’s right to choose premises and limiting tenant interference.
Ranju Lehra Das v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging denial of promotion where the petitioner voluntarily did not appear for the mandatory promotional examination and failed to meet eligibility criteria.
Ram Shovit Singh v. Sangeeta Gupta and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order against a tenant who failed to file leave to defend within the statutory period despite valid service by affixation, dismissing the revision petition challenging the eviction.
Richa Tiwari v. Kumar Sambhav Mishra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on grounds of contradictory pleadings or concealment of facts, and set aside the order rejecting the partition suit plaint on such grounds.
Mohd Mansoor v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to comply with permissible use conditions and pay misuse charges, refusing to quash MCD's notices for revocation of trade license due to misuse of premises.
Surbhi Catering v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court grants a seven-month extension of a catering stall license at Sant Hirdaram Nagar Railway Station, affirming its jurisdiction and consistent relief in similar cases.
Sh Raj Kumar v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking departmental enquiry against MCD officials for alleged identity disclosure, holding that disputed factual issues cannot be decided in writ proceedings and the petitioner’s claim was unsubstantiated.
Satish Kumar v. State (Govt. NCT Delhi) & Anr.
The High Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 NI Act, holding that statutory presumptions arise upon admission of cheque signatures and can only be rebutted by credible evidence, which the petitioner failed to provide.
Rajendra Singh v. Saroj Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 NI Act, holding that a cheque issued from the drawer's personal account creates personal liability which cannot be negated by claims of acting on behalf of a society.
Central Bank of India v. Anil Kumar & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of an employee for misappropriation of funds, setting aside the Labour Court's reinstatement order due to lack of valid defense and the importance of maintaining integrity in financial institutions.
Mr. Mritunjay v. Ex JWO Brij Mohan Verma
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Coronary Artery Disease, affirming that the burden lies on the employer to prove non-attributability to military service and limiting writ review to jurisdictional errors.
SPC v. EX LME Raju Kumar Tiwari
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for seizure disorder, affirming that the burden lies on the employer to prove non-attributability of disability to military service and that the High Court cannot reappraise factual findings in certiorari proceedings.
Prince Kumar Sharma and Others v. The State NCT of Delhi and Another
The Delhi High Court held that sexual acts with minors under the POCSO Act are offences irrespective of consent and refused to quash the FIR despite the victim's present wishes and settled family life.
Rakesh Kumar Sethi and Ors. v. Land Acquisition Collector
The Delhi High Court held that the limitation period for filing a reference under Section 18(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 starts from the decision date of Section 30-31 proceedings, allowing the petitioners' claim for enhanced compensation filed within six months thereafter.
Alok Rai v. DDA and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging the revocation of a revised sanction plan for balcony extensions, holding no error apparent on record to warrant review.
Isha Chaudhary and Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in matrimonial disputes.
Dhawan Kumar & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Deepak Yadav v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015 based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Deepa Chawla and Others v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) and Others
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420, 457, 468, 471, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.