Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Directorate of Enforcement v. Poonam Malik
The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of ED's freezing orders under PMLA for lack of 'reason to believe' and procedural non-compliance, affirming that mere suspicion is insufficient to freeze property.
Kunal Gosain and Kartikey Sikka v. Jupinder Kaur Maker
The Delhi High Court held that a consent order recording settlement terms with an undertaking to the Court is enforceable through contempt proceedings, and wilful disobedience thereof constitutes civil contempt.
RI NETWORKS PRIVATE LIMITED v. WORLD PHONE INTERNET SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that disputes arising between telecom service providers under an operational merger agreement fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of the TDSAT, barring civil court suits.
Didar Singh & Anr. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the murder conviction based on consistent and reliable dying declarations and corroborative circumstantial evidence, affirming that a voluntary dying declaration can solely sustain a conviction even without magistrate recording or medical certification.
K P Rana v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of parts of an arbitral award that improperly awarded claims beyond contractual terms and emphasized limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
M/S ALPRO INDUSTRIES v. M/S AMBIENCE PVT. LIMITED & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside an interim arbitral award due to the unilateral appointment of the sole arbitrator without an express waiver in writing, holding such appointment void ab initio under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
M/S Satveer Sharma v. Global Canesugar Services Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the Court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator accordingly, leaving all substantive issues for arbitration.
Libra Associates v. Dabur India Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that unilateral appointment of a sole arbitrator by one party violates the Arbitration Act's impartiality requirements and appointed a neutral arbitrator under Section 11.
Ankur Gauri @ Ankur & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354(B), 509, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and the victim's unwillingness to proceed, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
Roop Singh @ Rupesh Kumar & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a noncompoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498A IPC on the ground of amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
Vikrant Mathur & Anr. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 377, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the ground of amicable settlement and absence of prosecution interest, exercising its inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
Saleem Ahmad v. The State, NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed compounding of a Section 138 NI Act offence after conviction and dismissal of appeal upon amicable settlement, imposing costs as per Supreme Court guidelines.
Shangri-La International Hotel Management Pte. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax (International Tax)-3, Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s revision petition under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, setting aside the impugned order and directing consequential relief, rejecting the respondent’s reliance on a pending Supreme Court decision.
Shangri-La International Hotel Management Pte. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax (International Tax)-3 Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner's revision application under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, setting aside the impugned order and directing consequential relief, relying on binding precedents and closure of related Supreme Court proceedings.
Amit Singh & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498A IPC based on an amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS to prevent abuse of court process.
M/S MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD v. MR. RAJEEV GUPTA PROPRIETOR OF GRANITE GALAXY
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the court’s role is limited to a prima facie examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement without delving into arbitrability or merits.
Axis Finance Limited v. Avinash Yerramsetty
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the Court’s role is limited to a prima facie examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement without delving into arbitrability or validity.
Axis Finance Limited v. Dr. Mahesh S
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the Court’s role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed the sole arbitrator accordingly.
Proactive Data Systems Pvt Ltd v. Planex Interior Design Solutions LLP
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed the sole arbitrator despite the respondent's refusal to consent.
M/S. SINGH FINLEASE PVT. LTD. v. M/S. TRICITY EDUCATORS PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appointing a sole arbitrator after prima facie finding the existence of a valid arbitration agreement, limiting judicial scrutiny to existence and not validity or arbitrability.