Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Anil Kumar Gupta v. Ajit Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed a review petition challenging the maintainability of an interlocutory application under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC, directing the defendant to raise maintainability issues before the appropriate Bench.
ADM AGRO INDUSTRIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1(1) DELHI
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to produce documentary evidence to substantiate denial of alleged bogus transactions in reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act, 1961, and remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration.
Rakesh Meena v. Staff Selection Commission
Delhi High Court held that a migrant candidate retains his Scheduled Tribe reservation benefits from his state of origin despite non-inclusion of his caste in the central list of the domicile state and directed appointment accordingly.
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Limited v. Punj Lloyd Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the NCLT to expeditiously dispose of the petition challenging the stay on bank guarantee encashment, emphasizing that such stays require pleading fraud and that statutory remedies under the Insolvency Code must be pursued.
Dhanto & Ors. v. Ramesh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of tenants on the ground of bona fide requirement, affirming the landlord's ownership based on lease deeds despite address discrepancies.
Indian Overseas Bank v. Deputy Director, Director of Enforcement, Lucknow and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the confirmation of a PMLA attachment order, directing the petitioner to avail the statutory appellate remedy before the now constituted Appellate Tribunal.
M/S SISOTIYA EDUCATION SOCIETY REGD. & ANR. v. INTROMAX FURNITURE SYSTEM
The Delhi High Court held that imposing a condition to deposit the entire decretal amount as a pre-condition to set aside an ex parte decree is not mandatory and must be reasonable, especially where the defendant was not properly served.
Joseph Varghese v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed verification of official deployment lists before deciding entitlement to COVID-19 ex-gratia compensation, emphasizing that only government-deployed COVID-19 duty personnel qualify under the Cabinet Decision.
Bilag Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Daman
The Supreme Court held that sales between companies without mutual control or influence do not qualify as transactions between 'related persons' under Section 4(4)(c) of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, thereby disallowing additional duty demands based on such classification.
M/S BILAG INDUSTRIES P. LTD. & ANR. v. COMMR. OF CEN. EXC. DAMAN & ANR.
The Supreme Court held that mutual interest in each other's business is essential to classify parties as related persons under Section 4(4)(c) of the Central Excise Act, and set aside the differential duty demand on BIL for sales to its subsidiary Aventis CropScience (India) Ltd.
Messrs Bilag Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Daman
The Supreme Court held that sales between Bilag Industries Limited and Aventis Cropsciences (India) Ltd. were not between 'related persons' under Section 4(4)(c) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as there was no mutual interest in each other's business, and set aside the excise duty valuation order.
M/S BILAG INDUSTRIES P. LTD. & ANR. v. COMMR. OF CEN. EXC. DAMAN & ANR.
The Supreme Court held that mutual interest in each other's business is essential to treat parties as 'related persons' under Section 4(4)(c) of the Central Excise Act, and set aside the revenue's valuation based on related party transaction in favor of BIL.
ed4a30328bca4904c04aa35302db118c98ba259d26660e8c34a4ca0ce7238e1a
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition under the 1894 Act is complete only if possession is taken or compensation paid within five years before the 2013 Act's enforcement, overruling earlier precedent and allowing compensation claims under the 2013 Act where acquisition was incomplete.
S. Ravindar Bhatt v. Dashpaskar Datay
The court upheld the National Green Tribunal's directions mandating strict compliance by local authorities in maintaining prescribed maximum water levels and preventing unauthorized encroachments in the Tibhalbhav water reservoir, emphasizing judicial oversight in environmental governance.
Shramjeevi Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. v. Dinesh Joshi & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that the NGT erred in prohibiting construction based on draft maps ignoring prior final decrees and sanctioned development plans, directing fresh demarcation and adherence to natural justice.
M/S. PLATINUM THEATRE AND OTHERS v. COMPETENT AUTHORITY SMUGGLERS & FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANIPULATORS
The Supreme Court upheld the forfeiture of property under the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators Act, 1976, holding that failure to prove legitimate source of acquisition justifies forfeiture without option to pay fine.
Accelerate Productx Ventures Private Limited v. Reejh Essentials
The Delhi High Court directed reference of disputes under a valid arbitration clause to DIAC arbitration despite the respondent's non-appearance, exercising jurisdiction under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
M/S SOPHISTICATED INDUSTRIAL MATERIALS ANALYTIC LABS (P) LTD. v. M/S DHAL ENGINEERING COMPANY
The Delhi High Court held that arbitration clauses in contracts executed before the MSME Act govern dispute resolution, rejecting retrospective application of the MSME Act and appointing an arbitrator accordingly.
Sandeep Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide on the restoration of 200 CRPF posts within three months, holding that creation or abolition of posts requires government approval and the petition was premature pending such decision.
Master Pratham Singh Latwal v. Guru Gobind Singh Govt Hospital and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that claims of medical negligence require factual inquiry in appropriate forums and dismissed a writ petition seeking compensation for alleged delayed ROP screening, awarding limited ex gratia relief instead.