Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Pragya Electronics Pvt. Ltd. v. Cosmo Ferrites Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award, holding that judicial interference under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration Act is limited and the award did not suffer from patent illegality or procedural infirmities.
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. RAMA JAIN & ORS
The Delhi High Court partly allowed the insurer's appeal by reducing compensation based on averaged income from two assessment years and held that a widow receiving nominal salary for household expenses remains a dependent for motor accident claim purposes.
Smt. Gomati v. G.T.B. Hospital
Termination of a daily wage worker engaged against leave vacancies without continuous employment exceeding 240 days does not constitute retrenchment under the Industrial Disputes Act, and such termination is lawful.
Allengers Medical Systems Ltd. v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging disqualification in a medical equipment tender, holding that judicial review is limited to preventing arbitrariness and the petitioner failed to meet essential technical specifications.
Ajay Kumar Sharma & Ors. v. Union of India through Secretary MHA & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the DG BSF to decide the petitioners' pending representation for MACP benefits within four weeks and communicate the decision in writing.
Sh. Anil Kumar v. Jawaharlal Nehru University
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner’s past service in a judicially fixed Grade Pay must be counted for MACP financial upgradation eligibility, allowing the writ petition.
SMT RUBY THUKRAL & ANR. v. SH AJAY ARORA
The Delhi High Court allowed amendment of the plaint to challenge a disputed family settlement and held that an exclusive jurisdiction clause cannot oust the Court's jurisdiction when the settlement's validity is contested.
Shishpal Singh v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to clarify whether the petitioner’s transfer complied with the software-based transfer policy and to provide reasons if it did not, while emphasizing limited judicial interference in paramilitary postings.
Manish Singh v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed constitution of an independent Medical Board to reassess the petitioner's eyesight due to conflicting medical reports, with the Board's decision to be final and binding.
HI TECH SWEET WATER TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD v. INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING AND TOURISM CORPORATION LTD
Delhi High Court terminated the mandate of an arbitrator charging excessive fees beyond statutory limits and appointed a substitute arbitrator to ensure fair and timely arbitration proceedings.
Ravinder Kumar v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Directorate of Education to convene the Departmental Promotion Committee within eight weeks to consider the petitioner's promotion, emphasizing the legal obligation to hold DPCs regularly and without undue delay.
Darshan Singh and Anr v. M/s Capital Land Builder Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court set aside the impugned execution order dated 02.09.2022 by consent, restored execution proceedings to the prior stage, and directed expeditious disposal of objections before coercive action.
Rajesh Arora v. Union of India & Anr.
Delhi High Court directed ICSI to prescribe transparent criteria and tenure for appointment and rotation of members before constituting the Expert Group on Secretarial Standards.
Worknest Business Centre LLP & Anr. v. MS Worknests
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction to the registered proprietor of the trademark 'WORKNEST', holding that the defendant's later use of the deceptively similar mark 'WORKNESTS' infringed the plaintiff's exclusive rights arising from registration on a proposed-to-be-used basis.
Aruneema Devnath v. Vijay Kumar Devnath
The Delhi High Court allowed amendment of a divorce petition to one by mutual consent with a settlement of alimony and directed expeditious proceedings including possible waiver of the statutory waiting period.
Haryana Roadways v. Yunus Khan
Termination of a workman on expiry of a fixed-term contract does not amount to retrenchment under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and thus Sections 25-F, 25-G, and 25-H protections do not apply.
EX.CT/DVR Raj Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the petitioner’s writ petition as a representation and reconsider his claim for compassionate allowance under CCS (Pension) Rules within a stipulated time with a reasoned order.
Anita Sharma v. East Municipal Corporation and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging construction at Gandhi Nagar, holding the building plan was lawfully sanctioned and cautioning against frivolous PILs lacking bona fide public interest.
Veer Singh Bhadana v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court set aside the framing of charges under Section 307 IPC for failure to hear the accused, emphasizing the mandatory right to be heard before framing charges.
Vijay Singh v. Tamanna Anand & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to expeditiously dispose of the pending interim application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC limited to one respondent, while the challenge to dismissal under Order V Rule 20 CPC was withdrawn.