Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Sanjeev Tiwari v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking permission to participate in LDCE 2021, holding that a final departmental punishment disqualifies a candidate from eligibility due to lack of a clean service record.
Sunday Chinaka Uchem v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of four Nigerian nationals for murder and robbery based on reliable circumstantial evidence including authenticated CCTV footage and call records, dismissing challenges to evidence admissibility and procedural lapses.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv. v. COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICES TAX AND ANOTHER .....
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration without prior notice is invalid and directed cancellation to take effect from the date of the show cause notice.
versus
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner, an armed forces officer, to file a written statement beyond the premature closure by the trial court, relying on COVID-19 limitation extensions and settled law on pleadings.
Sulochna Gupta v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief restraining possession under the SARFAESI Act pending disposal of a recall application before the Debt Recovery Tribunal to prevent extreme hardship.
Indupal Kaur Sehgal v. Dr. Davinder Pal Singh Rekhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's application to amend pleadings challenging a prior partition decree, holding that the amendment would change the nature of the suit and constitute misuse of the legal process.
Praveen Gusain v. State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to co-accused in a murder case after prolonged custody, emphasizing that bail is the rule and jail the exception, with guilt to be determined at trial.
AIIMS v. MS S S Total Construction India Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, holding that limited grounds for interference were not met and the award was not patently illegal or against public policy.
Vicky Amar Gomes v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against conviction for murder, affirming the trial court's findings based on credible eyewitness testimony and corroborative forensic evidence.
Mohd Muslim @ Hussain v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Supreme Court allowed bail to an accused under the NDPS Act after prolonged pre-trial detention, holding that stringent bail conditions must be balanced with the constitutional right to a speedy trial and personal liberty.
Yashpal Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court quashed the High Court's bail orders in a serious murder case, holding that bail in such offences requires cogent reasons considering the gravity of the crime and the accused's conduct.
Yashpal Singh v. Uttar Pradesh State
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail orders for accused involved in serious offences including murder, emphasizing the need for concrete reasons before granting bail in heinous crimes.
Yashpal Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court quashed the High Court's bail orders in a serious murder case, emphasizing the need for cogent reasons considering the gravity of offences and rejecting bail granted without such reasons.
Shiva Kumar @ Shiva @ Shivamurthy v. State of Karnataka
The Supreme Court held that only Constitutional Courts can impose modified life sentences exceeding fourteen years, not limited to death penalty commutation cases, and accordingly modified the appellant's sentence to life imprisonment with a minimum of thirty years actual incarceration.
16ea6574fddde4b3ef5532ff3e6c5b6fe045d8b4c84f87d69bedc9a1d572ce73
The court upheld the conviction under Sections 366, 376, and 302 IPC based on a complete chain of circumstantial and medical evidence, dismissing the appeal.
Shiva Kumar @ Shiva @ Shivamurthy v. State of Karnataka
The Supreme Court held that only Constitutional Courts can impose modified life sentences exceeding fourteen years, not limited to death penalty commutation cases, and modified the appellant's sentence to life imprisonment with a minimum of thirty years' incarceration.
Tajvir Singh Sodhi v. State of Jammu and Kashmir
The Supreme Court upheld the quashing of a flawed drug inspector selection process in Jammu and Kashmir due to procedural irregularities, emphasizing limited judicial interference in expert committee decisions.
Tajvir Singh Sodhi v. State of Jammu and Kashmir
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's quashing of a flawed drug inspector selection process in Jammu and Kashmir due to procedural irregularities but limited judicial interference to legality and mala fide, emphasizing expert committee autonomy.
Pulon Kon v. Assam Government
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of appellants for murder as members of an unlawful assembly, affirming that consistent prosecution evidence and collective liability under Section 149 IPC sustain conviction despite minor procedural lapses.
Pulen Phukan & Ors. v. The State of Assam
The Supreme Court set aside the convictions for murder and related offences due to inconsistent prosecution evidence and unexplained police presence during the incident, granting benefit of doubt to the accused.