Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Manish Prasad v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that filing a chargesheet within the statutory period precludes default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. despite supplementary chargesheets, but granted bail under Section 35 of the POCSO Act due to trial delay beyond one year.
UP State Road Transport Corporation v. Chhoti Devi @ Poonam Devi
The Delhi High Court partially allowed the motor accident claim appeal, modifying compensation awards and clarifying that smell of alcohol alone does not prove intoxication or contributory negligence.
Gaurav Bhutani v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes after the parties reached an amicable settlement and obtained a mutual consent divorce.
Mandev Tubes Private Limited v. Goel Sales Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Trial Court's order releasing seized goods, holding that the respondent had prima facie lawfully obtained the products and the release order required no interference.
Mohit Kumar Gaur & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
P AND T GROUP A ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition on maintainability grounds, holding that service disputes against the Union of India fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.
Majestic Handicraft Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside reassessment notices and order under the Income Tax Act for lack of due diligence by the Assessing Officer and directed a fresh examination with opportunity to the petitioner.
MODI INDUSTRIES LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS.
The Delhi High Court set aside the reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2014-15 due to non-consideration of objections and absence of non-disclosure of material facts, directing the Assessing Officer to reconsider within four weeks.
MODI INDUSTRIES LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS.
The Delhi High Court set aside reassessment proceedings initiated on the basis of a change of opinion, holding that such reassessment under Sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act is impermissible without tangible material, while allowing the AO liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law.
Santosh Kumar Sahu & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court held that employees of AIESL have no vested right to retain government accommodation post-Air India privatization and penal rent deductions require due process under the Public Premises Act.
Dabur India Limited v. Ashok Kumar and Ors.
Delhi High Court directs coordinated enforcement against non-compliant domain name registrars infringing trademarks, endorsing blocking under IT Act and emphasizing compliance with intermediary guidelines.
Sachin Chadha v. BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court directed BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd to grant electricity connection to the petitioner without requiring NOC from co-owners, subject to commercial formalities, without recognizing ownership rights.
Shiv Mangal Singh v. Panna Lal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that interlocutory observations on possession in a contempt application are prima facie and do not prejudice trial rights, refusing to interfere with the Trial Court's dismissal of the contempt application.
versus
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the closure of an appeal for violation of Section 35B CPC due to delay, laches, and non-payment of costs, upholding the procedural bar against leading evidence after pleadings.
M/S SUPER ADS v. ALL INDIA RADIO (AKASHVANI) & ORS.
Clause 14 of the Agreement empowering the DG, AIR to decide disputes is not an arbitration agreement, and thus the suit for recovery is maintainable without mandatory reference to arbitration.
Govind Swarup & Anr v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to produce records related to a sealed shop before the appellate tribunal, holding that delay in disposal of the petitioners' application was prejudicial and the application had become infructuous.
Amanpreet Kohli v. Pankaj Dayal
The Delhi High Court held that a loan dispute between real estate merchants supported by mercantile documents qualifies as a commercial dispute and granted conditional summary judgment directing the defendant to deposit the claimed amount as security.
M/S S N MALHOTRA AND SONS v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to release principal payments due on duly approved bills to the petitioner within eight weeks, rejecting the Corporation's policy delaying payments based on fund availability.