Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Sunil v. Pinki Rani
The Delhi High Court condoned delay in filing an appeal against dismissal of a guardianship petition and disposed of the appeal by recording agreed visitation rights without altering custody.
Nathia Devi v. New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of the petitioner from a kiosk on public premises after cancellation of her license due to illegal transfer and unauthorized occupation in violation of NDMC policy.
Modern Snacks Pvt Ltd v. Modern Foods Enterprises Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that while the plaintiff is the prior adopter of the trademark 'MODERN' and the defendant's use causes likely confusion, the defendant's prior registration and delay by the plaintiff require a limited interim injunction restricting the defendant's use to existing products only.
Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. v. Enn Enn Corp Limited
Delhi High Court held that arbitration conducted at New Delhi is the seat of arbitration conferring exclusive jurisdiction on its courts to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Rajesh Kumar P V v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a second departmental inquiry and punishment against a BSF officer on the same charges as a prior exoneration, holding it violated double jeopardy and directed his promotion with consequential benefits.
Santhosh Maize & Industries Limited v. The State of Tamil Nadu & Anr.
The Supreme Court held that maize starch is taxable under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, rejecting exemption claims and upholding the retrospective validity of the Commissioner's clarification circular.
Santhosh Maize & Industries Limited v. The State of Tamil Nadu
The Supreme Court held that maize starch is taxable under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act and not exempt as a millet product, affirming the validity of retrospective tax clarifications issued by the Commissioner.
DHEERAJ SINGH v. GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
The Supreme Court held that failure of the High Court to consider cross objections in an appeal under the Land Acquisition Act vitiates the judgment and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
Dheeraj Singh v. Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority
The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in not considering cross objections filed by appellants in a land acquisition compensation appeal and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
Reserve Bank of India v. Nair
The Supreme Court held that reservation benefits in pension schemes apply prospectively from the statutory cut-off dates and cannot be extended retrospectively to prior service periods.
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA v. A. K. NAIR
The Supreme Court upheld the entitlement of persons with disabilities to reservation in promotions under the PwD Act, directing RBI to grant promotion benefits to A.K. Nair, while clarifying the constitutional and legislative framework governing such reservations.
Reserve Bank of India v. A. K. Nair
The Supreme Court upheld statutory reservation in promotion for disabled persons under the PWD Act and directed RBI to grant promotion with reservation benefits to A.K. Nair, affirming the validity of such reservation distinct from SC/ST constitutional provisions.
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA v. A. K. NAIR
The Supreme Court held that persons with disabilities are entitled to reservation benefits in promotions under the PwD Act, 1995 and 2016, directing RBI to grant promotion and benefits to Mr. Nair accordingly.
Shantabai Ananda Jagtap v. Jayaram Ganpati Jagtap
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that without establishing employer-employee relationship and excusing the inordinate delay, compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act cannot be granted.
Shantabai Ananda Jagtap v. Jayram Ganpati Jagtap
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal for compensation under the Employees Compensation Act due to failure to prove employer-employee relationship and inordinate delay in filing the claim.
Shantabai Ananda Jagatap v. Jayaram Ganpati Jagatap
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal holding that the claim under the Workmen's Compensation Act was rightly rejected due to inordinate delay and failure to establish employer-employee relationship.
Shantabai Ananda Jagtap v. Jayram Ganpati Jagtap
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal seeking compensation under the Employees Compensation Act due to failure to prove employer-employee relationship and inordinate delay in filing the claim.
Central Excise Commissioner v. M/s Reliance Industries Limited
The court upheld that extended limitation for excise duty demands applies only in cases of fraud or suppression, and a bona fide belief based on precedent negates such extension.
Commissioner, Central Excise and Customs and Another v. M/s Reliance Industries Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that demands for differential excise duty raised beyond the normal limitation period are time barred in absence of fraud or suppression, affirming that a bona fide belief based on binding precedent precludes invocation of extended limitation under Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act.
Om Prakash Ahuja v. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that an insurer cannot refuse renewal or deny claims for a validly renewed health insurance policy on grounds of unrelated non-disclosure, directing reimbursement of medical expenses and restoration of renewal orders.