Delhi High Court

36,666 judgments

Year:

Mohd. Mustaqeem v. State (Govt of NCT) of Delhi

18 Dec 2023 · Amit Bansal · 2023:DHC:9079

Bail was denied to the accused charged with murder during communal riots due to prima facie evidence and credible eyewitness identification, with discrepancies and forensic doubts reserved for trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail Section 302 IPC Section 437(2) CrPC eyewitness identification

Manjeet Singh v. Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.

18 Dec 2023 · Subramonium Prasad · 2023:DHC:9128

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the NCDRC's order repudiating an insurance claim due to doubts on accident genuineness and insured value, affirming limited scope of interference under Article 227.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India Insurance claim repudiation Insured declared value Indian Motor Tariff

Chander Bhan v. The State NCT of Delhi

18 Dec 2023 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2023:DHC:9141

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of ASI Chander Bhan in a criminal case involving allegations of extortion, assault, and corruption, citing the gravity of charges and risk of witness influence.

criminal bail_denied bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. police misconduct extortion witness tampering

Sompal Singh Tomar v. State (NCT of Delhi)

18 Dec 2023 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2023:DHC:9133

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a police official accused of extortion and assault, emphasizing the gravity of allegations and risk of witness intimidation.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail police misconduct extortion wrongful confinement

Varsha Mandirata & Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Ors.

18 Dec 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:9190
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that the State is strictly liable to pay compensation for death caused by negligence of its instrumentalities under Article 21, applying res ipsa loquitur and the multiplier method, and allowed the writ petition despite inter se disputes between government departments.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant compensation res ipsa loquitur Article 21 Article 226

Pramod Kumar v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr. & Ors.

18 Dec 2023 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2023:DHC:9100

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in a serious POCSO case involving the sexual assault of a minor, holding that the victim's consistent testimony and corroborative evidence outweigh minor contradictions and do not justify bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail POCSO Act sexual assault minor victim

Union of India v. Express Newspapers Ltd.

18 Dec 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh

The Delhi High Court stayed the 1987 lease termination notices against Express Newspapers Ltd., directing detailed rent computations and resolving counsel fee issues, pending final adjudication on the validity of lease termination and possession recovery.

property other Significant lease termination re-entry possession recovery lease deed

Anand Prakash v. Sohan Lal

18 Dec 2023 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2023:DHC:9373

The Delhi High Court fixed tentative use and occupation charges at Rs. 5,000 per month for a disputed shop during pendency of eviction proceedings, conditioning interim protection on timely payment.

property other use and occupation charges tenant landlord shop measurement

U.P. State Road Transport Corporation v. Rajbir Singh

18 Dec 2023 · Anish Dayal · 2023:DHC:9080

The Delhi High Court upheld the MACT's award of compensation to a motor accident victim, rejecting the appellant's plea of contributory negligence and confirming the bus driver's sole liability.

motor_accident_claims appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 negligence contributory negligence compensation

Purshottam Dutt Thapliyal and Anr v. Ankur Goel and Anr

18 Dec 2023 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:9145

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners' appeal under Article 227 to reinstate their defence upon payment of arrears and interest in installments, setting aside the Trial Court's order striking off their defence.

civil appeal_allowed use and occupation charges striking off defence Article 227 Constitution of India installment payment

GSP Crop Science Pvt Ltd v. Synergy Insecticides Pvt Ltd

18 Dec 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:9416

The Delhi High Court disposed of a patent infringement suit by a consent decree based on a lawful settlement acknowledging the plaintiff's exclusive patent rights and binding undertakings by the defendant.

civil appeal_allowed patent infringement Indian Patent 394568 settlement agreement consent decree

Tangri v. Hunter Security Force Private Limited

18 Dec 2023 · C. Hari Shankar

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator and referred the dispute to arbitration, retaining interim relief and relegating related proceedings to the arbitral tribunal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

arbitration appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 17 Section 12(2) interim order

Gurmit Kaur & Anr. v. Kuldip Kaur & Ors.

16 Dec 2023 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:9229

The Delhi High Court upheld conditional permission for defendants to alienate parts of disputed property during pendency of a suit challenging a Will, with safeguards protecting plaintiffs' rights and directed trial on the Will's genuineness.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant conditional sale permission disputed property registered Will partition suit

Union of India and Anr. v. Cipla Limited

15 Dec 2023 · Vibhu Bakhru; Subramonium Prasad · 2023:DHC:9496-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court dismissed Cipla's review petition, affirming that rounding off the MRP of non-scheduled drugs is limited to two decimal points as per NPPA guidelines and applies prospectively.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant rounding off maximum retail price non-scheduled drug formulations Drugs (Price Control) Order 2013

GE CAPITAL GLOBAL ENERGY INVESTMENT BV v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1(3)(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION & ANR

15 Dec 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:9433-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, holding that investment in debentures is a loan transaction and without accrued interest, no escaped income exists to justify reassessment.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 148 Income Tax Act escaped income reopening of assessment Compulsory Convertible Debentures

Pankaj Prakash v. United India Insurance Company Limited & Anr.

15 Dec 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:9019
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging denial of retrospective promotion, holding that the petitioner was duly considered and did not meet cut-off criteria, and that the promotion process complied with Supreme Court directions and applicable rules.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant promotion Annual Performance Appraisal Report APAR Article 226

Megh Kumar Jain v. M/S India Overseas Coporation and Ors.

15 Dec 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:9016

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court’s dismissal of a workman’s claim as barred by the mandatory three-year limitation under Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act, rejecting writ interference.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2A limitation period workman definition

Sunita Singh v. Shree Prakash Singh

15 Dec 2023 · Rekha Palli · 2023:DHC:9049

The Delhi High Court granted unconditional leave to defend a suit based on an incomplete MoU, holding that triable issues of contract validity and jurisdiction require full trial despite absence of the original document at the leave to defend stage.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) CPC leave to defend Memorandum of Understanding validity of contract

Imran Akmal v. Shahnaz Khan @ Shahnaaj Khan & Anr.

15 Dec 2023 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:9369

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to admit documents filed belatedly by the defendant under Order VIII Rule 1A CPC, emphasizing mandatory early disclosure and relevance in landlord-tenant disputes.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order VIII Rule 1A CPC Article 227 Constitution of India landlord-tenant dispute admissibility of documents

Morgan Securities & Credits Pvt Ltd v. Samtel Display Systems Ltd

15 Dec 2023 · Sachin Datta · 2023:DHC:9041
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside part of an arbitral award due to internal contradictions on share valuation and interest claims, affirming that awards must be reasoned and free from patent illegality under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral award Section 34 Arbitration Act Internal contradiction Patent illegality