Delhi High Court

36,666 judgments

Year:

Asstt Comdt Rahul Bhasharkar v. Union of India & Ors.

04 Jan 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:39-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking refixation of seniority and promotion after a 16-20 year delay, holding that such stale claims are barred by delay and laches and non-communication of adverse entries must be timely challenged.

service_law petition_dismissed Significant seniority promotion delay and laches non-communication of adverse entry

Technology Development Board v. SELCO INTERNATIONAL LTD.

04 Jan 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5139
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of a 19-day delay in refiling a petition challenging an arbitral award, holding that refiling beyond 30 days from defect notification does not automatically amount to fresh filing and emphasizing a liberal approach to delay condonation.

civil petition_allowed Significant condonation of delay refiling petition arbitral award challenge Section 34(3) Arbitration Act

Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan v. T. Pritam

04 Jan 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:9523-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing appointment of the respondent as Deputy Commissioner, rejecting KVS's challenge based on eligibility and suppression allegations unsupported by material.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Recruitment Rules Education Officer (Trainee) Deputy Commissioner Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan

R v. The Union of India through Secretary Ministry of Health and Family Welfare & Ors.

04 Jan 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:49

Delhi High Court permitted medical termination of pregnancy beyond 24 weeks for a widow suffering extreme trauma, affirming reproductive autonomy and flexible interpretation of MTP Rules.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 Rule 3B(c) MTP Rules 2003 reproductive autonomy bodily autonomy

Rajesh Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

03 Jan 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:26-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the finality of the petitioner’s withdrawal of VRS option exercised online within the prescribed period, dismissing his plea to reconsider the VRS application despite a claimed technical error.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Voluntary Retirement Scheme BSNL VRS 2019 withdrawal of offer Indian Contract Act

Rahul Anil Ahuja v. Gurcharan Dhawan & Ors.

03 Jan 2024 · ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE; MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA · 2024:DHC:55-DB

The Delhi High Court permitted the petitioner to occupy the property until the auction date subject to payment of rent and compliance with DRT orders, while withdrawing challenges to recovery proceedings.

civil petition_allowed Debt Recovery Tribunal Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 auction proceedings possession

Mahender Singh v. The Delhi State Co-operative Bank Ltd.

03 Jan 2024 · ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE; MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA · 2024:DHC:133-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an arbitral award holding that the surety’s liability is co-extensive with the borrower’s and procedural irregularities did not vitiate the award.

civil petition_dismissed arbitral award surety liability Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003 personal surety deed

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. Shankhajit Parmanik and Ors

03 Jan 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:48-DB

The Delhi High Court directed expeditious disposal of the appeal restraining Kotak Mahindra Bank from taking possession of secured property, leaving substantive rights open for adjudication.

civil other Procedural SARFAESI Act Debt Recovery Tribunal secured creditor possession

Dr. Amit George & Mr. Piyo Harold Jaimon v. S Gurumurthy

03 Jan 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:45-DB

The Delhi High Court closed contempt proceedings against respondents who tendered unconditional apologies and removed offending content, affirming that free speech without mala fide intent does not constitute contempt.

criminal petition_dismissed contempt of court unconditional apology freedom of speech Article 19 Constitution of India

Ramesh Kakkar v. State of NCT of Delhi

03 Jan 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:6
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of murder, emphasizing caution in relying on oral dying declarations and prolonged custody without trial completion.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 439 CrPC murder dying declaration

Anil Nirwan v. State of NCT of Delhi

03 Jan 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:4
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a sexual assault and cheating case, holding that the sexual intercourse was prima facie consensual and the money transactions voluntary, with no further custodial interrogation required.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant regular bail Section 376 IPC Section 420 IPC consent

R.S. Chadha v. Thakur Dass

03 Jan 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:8
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order allowing landlord's bona fide requirement under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, dismissing tenant's revision petition for leave to defend due to lack of triable issues.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) bona fide requirement leave to defend

Indotech Magnetics v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax

03 Jan 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:31-DB

The Delhi High Court held that GST registration cannot be cancelled retrospectively without objective satisfaction and reasons, setting aside a retrospective cancellation order and directing cancellation from the date of the taxpayer’s application.

tax petition_allowed Significant GST registration retrospective cancellation Section 29(2) CGST Act show cause notice

Anil Kumar Sharma v. State (NCT of Delhi)

03 Jan 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:7

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a cheating case under Section 420 IPC, emphasizing the presumption of innocence, prolonged pre-trial custody without framing charges, and the non-punitive nature of bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 420 IPC economic offences pre-trial custody

Suresh Kumar Dubey v. Union of India

03 Jan 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:18-DB

The Delhi High Court stayed a BSF personnel’s movement order to report to headquarters until after his children’s exams due to humanitarian grounds, subject to an undertaking to comply thereafter.

administrative other movement order Border Security Force service personnel humanitarian grounds

Ramesh & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi

03 Jan 2024 · Vikas Mahajan

The Delhi High Court set aside convictions due to the irretrievable loss of trial records, holding that the appellants' right to a fair appeal under Article 21 was violated.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Trial Court Record Right to fair appeal Article 21 Section 385 CrPC

MS Simplex Infrastructures Ltd v. National Highways Authority of India & Anr.

03 Jan 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:33

The Delhi High Court appointed arbitrators under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act with parties' consent, leaving open the legal question of whether all arbitrators must be from the SAROD panel.

civil petition_allowed Procedural Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) SAROD arbitration rules Nomination of arbitrators

Jasbir Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

03 Jan 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:3-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that genuine emergency medical treatment in a non-empanelled hospital is fully reimbursable despite procedural rules, affirming the right to health under Article 21.

administrative petition_allowed Significant medical reimbursement non-empanelled hospital emergency treatment Railway Board circular 2007

Shri Sumit Sapra v. Smt. Akansha Ahuja Sapra

03 Jan 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:2-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal of anti-suit injunction, holding that the USA court is the appropriate forum for divorce and custody proceedings where both parties reside.

family appeal_dismissed Significant anti-suit injunction forum conveniens Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 foreign divorce decree

Anil Kumar Sharma v. State (NCT of Delhi)

03 Jan 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:75

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused director in an economic offence case, emphasizing the presumption of innocence, completed investigation, prolonged custody, and the non-punitive nature of bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail economic offences Section 406 IPC Section 420 IPC