Delhi High Court

44,644 judgments

Year:

Parul Gaur v. Union of India & Ors.

04 Mar 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:1802-DB

The Delhi High Court declined to interfere via Habeas Corpus in a custody dispute pending before the Mahila Court, directing the petitioner to seek telephonic contact with her children through the Ministry of External Affairs.

family petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus custody of minor children matrimonial dispute Article 226 Constitution

CCS Computers Private Limited v. New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.

04 Mar 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2023 SCC OnLine Del 1007

The Delhi High Court quashed a blacklisting order for lack of reasoned decision and violation of natural justice, directing fresh proceedings with proper notice and opportunity to respond.

administrative petition_allowed Significant blacklisting natural justice reasoned order General Financial Rules 2017

Riteesh Mohan Bakshi & Anr v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors

04 Mar 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:1844

The Delhi High Court granted interim protection to petitioners against a forest department notice alleging encroachment, directing due process and consideration of ownership claims before coercive action.

constitutional petition_allowed writ petition Article 226 Indian Forest Act, 1927 Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

M/S PRACHI INFRA AND ROADS PVT. LTD. v. M/S KANTI PRASHAD MITTAL & ORS

04 Mar 2024 · THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MANMOHAN; MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITA... · 2024:DHC:1841-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging a direction for CBI enquiry into unauthorized subcontracting under a government infrastructure contract, emphasizing that disputed factual issues require investigation and parties cannot rely on project experience pending enquiry.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant subcontracting government contract performance certificate CBI enquiry

SWISS BIKE VERTRIEBS GMBH SUBSIDIARY OF ACCELL GROUP v. RELIANCE BRANDS LIMITED

04 Mar 2024 · Anish Dayal · 2024:DHC:1884

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining defendant's use of the mark 'RALLEYZ' for bicycles, holding it deceptively similar to plaintiff's registered trademark 'RALEIGH' under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Deceptive similarity Phonetic similarity Interlocutory injunction

AMAR ENTERPRISES v. COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICES TAX AND ANR

04 Mar 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:1828-DB

The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective satisfaction and prior notice, and modified the cancellation to take effect from the Show Cause Notice date instead of an earlier retrospective date.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST registration retrospective cancellation Section 29(2) CGST Act Show Cause Notice

S SRI RADHA KRISHNA INTERNATIONAL v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

04 Mar 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:1829-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 CGST Act for failing to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remanded the matter for re-adjudication with an opportunity to be heard.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Input Tax Credit Section 73 CGST Act Cancelled dealer Show Cause Notice

M/S SALASAR TRADING COMPANY v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF GOODS AND SERVICE TAX NORTH DELHI

04 Mar 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:1858-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a retrospective GST registration cancellation order for lack of reasons and procedural fairness, emphasizing objective satisfaction and notice requirements under Section 29(2) of the CGST Act.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation retrospective cancellation Section 29(2)(e) CGST Act procedural fairness

ZOMLIM INDIA TRADE INDIA PVT LTD v. DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE NEW DELHI & ANR.

04 Mar 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:1857-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Customs authority to expeditiously consider the petitioner's request for release or provisional release of seized goods under Section 110 of the Customs Act, 1962, without deciding on the merits.

administrative other Customs Act, 1962 Section 110 seizure of goods provisional release

Jagat Singh & Ors. v. NCT of Delhi & Ors.

04 Mar 2024 · Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:1750

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' challenge under Article 227 against the Trial Court's order directing fresh demarcation of disputed property at petitioners' cost, affirming the limited scope of supervisory jurisdiction.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India supervisory jurisdiction demarcation property dispute

Chandra Kanta Agarwala v. Ajay Gaur & Anr

04 Mar 2024 · Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:1748

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to summon records from a separate suit for handwriting verification, directing the petitioner to seek such relief before the competent civil court, affirming the limited scope of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India Delhi Rent Control Act 1958 handwriting expert supervisory jurisdiction

NEC Corporation India Private Limited v. M/S Plus 91 Security Solutions & Ors.

04 Mar 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:1944
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's application for leave to defend a summary suit for recovery of dues under purchase orders, holding that counterclaims from separate contracts cannot be raised as defenses in Order XXXVII CPC proceedings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXXVII CPC leave to defend summary suit postdated cheques

Varun Chauhan v. State NCT of Delhi

04 Mar 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:1793

Anticipatory bail was denied to the accused impersonating a government official in a cheating and forgery case, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation to uncover the conspiracy.

criminal appeal_dismissed anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. impersonation cheating

Delhi Development Authority v. M/S SPORTINA PAYCE INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.

04 Mar 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:2288

The Delhi High Court set aside parts of an arbitral award for lack of adequate reasoning and violation of natural justice while upholding other factual findings, clarifying the limits of judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral award Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Natural justice Right to be heard

Rekha Jain v. Department of Health and Family Welfare

04 Mar 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:1891

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking penal interest on delayed Earned Leave encashment, holding that administrative delays due to pay revision do not attract penal interest under established Supreme Court precedents.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Earned Leave encashment penal interest retiral benefits delay in payment

Sh. Hari Krishan Aggarwal v. Technology Development Board

04 Mar 2024 · Jasmeet Singh · 2024:DHC:2039

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award due to the sole arbitrator's unilateral appointment without an express written waiver of Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, affirming that such appointments lack jurisdiction.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 12(5) unilateral appointment sole arbitrator

Green Edge Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. Magic Eye Developers Private Limited

04 Mar 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:1783

The Delhi High Court held that disputes arising under an agreement lacking an arbitration clause are arbitrable if the agreement is interlinked with a principal agreement containing a broad arbitration clause, and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement composite transaction interlinked agreements arbitrability

Government of NCT of Delhi v. Shri Dheeraj Kumar & Ors.

04 Mar 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:2129-DB

Delhi High Court upheld Rs.75 lakh compensation against Delhi Police for negligence in leaving chained barricades unattended, rejecting contributory negligence and affirming police duty of care under SOP.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant negligence compensation barricades duty of care

Manak Portfolios (P) Ltd. & Ors. v. Geeta Katyal & Anr.

04 Mar 2024 · Sachin Datta

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a registered sale deed and will, dismissed the defendants' suit barred by prior withdrawal without leave, and granted possession and injunction to the plaintiffs under Order XII Rule 6 and Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC Order XII Rule 6 CPC Order VII Rule 11 CPC registered sale deed

Gurpreet Kaur Gujral & Ors. v. M/S Portrucks Equipment Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

04 Mar 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:2111-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the trial court had pecuniary jurisdiction and the security deposit could not be adjusted against rent after the tenant vacated the premises.

civil appeal_dismissed security deposit pecuniary jurisdiction lease deed vacation of premises