Kapil & Ors. v. State of GNCT of Delhi

Delhi High Court · 05 Mar 2024 · 2024:DHC:1809
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
CRL.M.C. 1861/2024
2024:DHC:1809
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties and their resumption of cohabitation, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.

Full Text
Translation output
CRL.M.C. 1861/2024
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 05.03.2024
CRL.M.C. 1861/2024
KAPIL & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr.Montu and Mr.Jagdish Diwakar Advocates
WITH
petitioners in person.
VERSUS
STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI
THROUGH SHO & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Ms.Kiran Bairwa, APP
WITH
Insp. Rajesh Vijay (SHO) & ASI Ajit
Kumar, PS Bharat Nagar.
Ms.Deepali Sharma and Mr.Praveen Kumar, Advocates
WITH
respondent
No.2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
JUDGMENT
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J (ORAL)
CRL.M.A. 7084/2024
Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.

1. Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioners for quashing of FIR No. 557/2020, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at P.S.: Bharat Nagar and proceedings emanating therefrom.

2. Issue notice. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for respondent No.2 alongwith respondent No.2 in person appear on advance notice and accept notice.

3. In brief, as per the case of the petitioners, marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 was solemnized according to Hindu rites and ceremonies on 19.02.2018. A female child was born out of wedlock. Due to temperamental differences, respondent No.2 and petitioner No.1 started living separately since 06.08.2019. Present FIR was registered on the complaint of respondent No. 2, on 01.10.2020.

4. The disputes are stated to have been amicably settled between the parties in terms of Settlement Agreement dated 26.11.2021 and the parties are since residing together.

5. Learned APP for the State submits that in view of amicable settlement between the parties, the State has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

6. Petitioners as well as respondent No. 2 are present in person and have been identified by ASI Ajit Kumar, P.S.: Bharat Nagar. I have interacted with the parties and they confirm that the matter has been amicably settled between them without any threat, pressure or coercion. Respondent No. 2 also states that nothing remains to be further adjudicated upon between the parties and they have been residing together happily and she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, no useful purpose shall be served by keeping the case pending. It would be nothing but an abuse of the process of Court. Consequently, FIR No. 557/2020, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at P.S.: Bharat Nagar and the proceedings emanating therefrom stand quashed. Petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending application, if any, also stand disposed of.

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J. MARCH 05, 2024