Delhi High Court
92,849 judgments
Sh. Deepak Kumar v. Smt. Manita Rani
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to fix specific dates for recording the respondent's evidence to expedite disposal of a decade-old divorce petition.
Jitender Chawla v. Binod Kumar Begwani & Anr.
The High Court dismissed the petitioner's application to be impleaded in a tenancy suit, holding that co-ownership claims do not make him a necessary or proper party to the tenancy dispute.
Tani Sandhu Bhargava v. Shumita Didi Sandhu
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's possession suit on admission under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, rejecting the defendant's unsubstantiated claim of HUF ownership and upholding the validity of the gift deed.
Parvin Kumar Jain v. Anju Jain
The Delhi High Court held that Family Courts retain jurisdiction to grant and enhance maintenance under Sections 24 and 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act even after divorce petition withdrawal, allowing maintenance to an adult child pursuing education and enhancing interim maintenance with interest on arrears.
Insp. Manish Bhati v. Raj Kumar Mishra
The High Court upheld framing of charges under Sections 304(I), 347, and 34 IPC and discharged accused from Section 302 IPC, holding that no prima facie case for murder was made out at the charge framing stage.
Sanjeen Sahni v. Manmeet Sahni
The Delhi High Court upheld the family court's order directing the appellant to restore possession of a vehicle registered in the respondent's name, rejecting claims of ownership based on third-party funding and dismissing the appeal.
Vaibhav Aggarwal & Anr. v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 406 IPC following an amicable settlement involving compensation, emphasizing prevention of abuse of judicial process.
Sh. Vijay Kumar Jain v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 288 and 338 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement and compensation paid, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
Rajiv Khanna v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking protection of alleged street vending rights at Ajmal Khan Road due to lack of credible evidence of allotment and possession.
Sanjay Gupta v. Richa Chandra
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the issuance of summons under the Domestic Violence Act, affirming that the Trial Court and appellate court properly applied their minds and that delay in filing the appeal was unjustified.
Neelam @ Geeta v. Rakesh Kumar Sharma & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's applications for condonation of delay and restoration of appeal due to lack of sufficient cause, emphasizing the need for bona fide explanation and diligent prosecution.
Shakti Metals v. The Commissioner Central Goods and Services Tax and Ors
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of GST registration imposed without due process and restored the petitioner’s registration, emphasizing the need for specific allegations and opportunity to respond.
Heirs and Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking possession and compensation for land acquired in 1958, holding the claim barred by limitation and affirming the finality of acquisition proceedings completed decades ago.
Dharmender Singh v. Asgar Imam & Ors
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by increasing the functional disability assessment from 32% to 64%, emphasizing proper evaluation of disability in light of the claimant's occupation and earning capacity.
Jabbar & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Rajesh Sachdeva v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the order releasing seized bank funds to the complainant without issuing a show-cause notice or recording findings under Section 107 BNSS, directing the amount to remain deposited pending investigation.
Dharmender Kumar @ Dharmender Singh and Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
M/S ALIBABA ENTERPRISES v. SALES TAX OFFICER CLASS-II/AVATO WARD - 83, DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires clear reasons and prior proposal in the Show Cause Notice, and modified the cancellation order to be effective prospectively.
Sunita Kohli and Anr v. Kuldeep Singh Sejwal
The High Court allowed the petition under Article 227 to set aside the Trial Court's closure of the petitioners' evidence, granting a final opportunity to lead evidence subject to costs and strict conditions.
Nandita v. National Testing Agency and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging NEET (UG)-2024 answer keys for two questions, holding that courts must defer to expert opinions unless errors are manifestly incorrect.