Delhi High Court
48,408 judgments
Puneet Arora v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking retrieval of call detail records beyond the statutory two-year retention period, holding that non-availability of such records does not violate the right to a fair trial.
Talim @ Talib v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to the petitioner accused of possessing 51 kg ganja and heading a national drug syndicate, holding that stringent conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act for bail were not met.
Vanitha Dhanuk v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of bail granted to the accused in a neighborhood dispute, holding no violation of bail conditions or sufficient grounds for interference.
Narender Mohan Pal & Anr. v. National Insurance Co Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an insurer remains liable to pay third-party compensation despite absence of a valid commercial permit, unless it proves a conscious breach by the insured, and dismissed the insurer's claim to recover compensation from the vehicle owner in this case.
Suman & Ors. v. National Insurance Co Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced the motor accident compensation by recalculating loss of dependency with appropriate deductions and upheld the negligence and liability of the offending vehicle's driver.
Faeem and Ors. v. The State (GNCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement between the married parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.
Balram and Anr v. State Through SHO PS Chhawala and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR involving minor offences arising from family disputes following an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Ankit Alias Jugnu and Anr v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs involving minor offences under IPC following an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
Raju Singh and Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.
Rohit Singh Rawat v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR alleging sexual assault and extortion, holding that disputed facts and evidence must be examined during trial and not at the quashing stage.
Nikhil Gupta v. Principal Additional Director General DGGI Gurugram Zonal Unit
The Delhi High Court held that provisional attachment orders under Section 83(1) CGST Act can be validly passed by authorized officers including the Principal Additional Director General and directed expeditious disposal of the petitioner's objections under Rule 159(5).
Sunil Kumar v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed the orders directing registration of FIR against a police officer for alleged improper investigation, holding that the allegations did not prima facie disclose any cognizable offence and the orders were passed without proper judicial scrutiny.
Gautam Kant Nimaan v. N & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's interim maintenance order of Rs.25,000 per month for minor children, dismissed the petitioner's challenge, and refused to stay execution of maintenance arrears.
Giri, Anuj Shukla and Ashish Chaubey v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors
Delhi High Court transfers investigation of fatal basement flooding to CBI, directs removal of encroachments, and mandates infrastructural reforms to address systemic civic failures.
Lata Bansal & Ors. v. Raman Kumar Bansal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the closure of the appellants' right to file their written statement and affidavit due to inordinate delay and negligence.
Amarnath Ghosh Dastidar v. State and Ors
The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition allowing the respondents to place a handwriting expert report on record in a probate suit, with the petitioner reserving the right to cross-examine the expert.
Bibhav Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the legality of the petitioner’s arrest, holding it was lawful, justified, and compliant with procedural safeguards under Cr.P.C.
Anil Mittal v. VVN Trading Pvt Ltd
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretion in refusing to summon the defendant company's chairman as a witness under Order XVI Rule 14 CPC, dismissing the petition challenging that order.
NEHA BUS SERVICES PVT. LTD. v. M/S PINTU
The High Court directed the plaintiff to produce a booklet of monthly pass counterfoils for the Trial Court's perusal during final arguments and disposed of the petition without granting further relief.
Veer Singh v. Kinri Dhir
The High Court granted liberty to the petitioner to file an affidavit of non-opposition in a guardianship petition and left it to the trial court to pass appropriate orders without expressing any opinion on merits.