Delhi High Court

47,415 judgments

Year:

Sabib v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi

28 Aug 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:6864

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to a father accused of aggravated penetrative sexual assault on his minor daughter, emphasizing the presumption of guilt under the POCSO Act and the paramount interest of the child.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail POCSO Act aggravated penetrative sexual assault Section 29 POCSO

Dr. Tarun Kothari v. The State of NCT of Delhi

28 Aug 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:6865

The Delhi High Court held that police can register FIRs and investigate offences under Sections 117, 109, 269, 188 IPC and the Epidemic Diseases Act despite Section 195 CrPC restrictions on court cognizance, and dismissed the petition seeking quashing of FIR against a doctor for Covid-19 related statements.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant FIR quashing Section 195 CrPC Epidemic Diseases Act Covid-19

Mohd Yameen v. Aas Mohd

28 Aug 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:6898
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 NI Act, holding that the petitioner failed to prove the loan of Rs.5 lakh and the accused successfully rebutted the presumption of liability.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 139 NI Act presumption Dishonour of cheque Rebuttable presumption

M/S Chetanya Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. v. Shri Lalit Mohan Tewari & Ors.

28 Aug 2024 · Jasmeet Singh · 2024:DHC:6482

The Delhi High Court held that time was of the essence in the Collaboration Agreement for immovable property, and the plaintiff's failure to pay the balance consideration within the stipulated period disentitled it from specific performance, resulting in dismissal of the suit.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance time essence of contract immovable property collaboration agreement

Kanhaiya Lal v. Delhi Development Authority and Ors.

28 Aug 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:6460

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging DDA's construction of a boundary wall on adjoining land, holding that the petitioner failed to prove easement rights or legitimate expectation over the land lawfully owned by DDA.

property petition_dismissed Significant easement rights legitimate expectation encroachment Delhi Development Authority

Inderjeet Singh Tosaria v. Delhi Development Authority

28 Aug 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:6458

The Delhi High Court held that DDA's cancellation of allotment without proper notice and imposition of interest due to its own delay was illegal, directing refund of interest to the petitioner.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Delhi Development Authority allotment cancellation show-cause notice hire purchase

Ajmer Singh v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

28 Aug 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:6448

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition holding that the respondents complied with the Court's directions on ACP/MACP benefits and wrongful deductions, negating wilful disobedience.

administrative petition_dismissed Contempt of Court Assured Career Progression (ACP) Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) Wrongful deduction

Chander Singh v. State N.C.T. of Delhi

28 Aug 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain

Delhi High Court partially allowed appeals by altering murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder for solitary non-vital injury inflicted without premeditation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part II IPC culpable homicide murder

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI v. SANDEEP KUMAR

28 Aug 2024 · SURESH KUMAR KAIT; GIRISH KATHPALIA · 2024:DHC:6475-DB

The High Court upheld the Tribunal's quashing of departmental punishment against a jail warder due to absence of reliable evidence proving negligence during duty.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant departmental enquiry negligence warden duty Central Administrative Tribunal

Tiger Global International III Holdings v. The Authority for Advance Rulings (Income-Tax)

28 Aug 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:6473-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the AAR's dismissal of treaty benefit claims by Mauritius-based petitioners on sale of shares in a Singapore company, holding the transaction prima facie designed for tax avoidance and outside the scope of the India-Mauritius DTAA.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Double Tax Avoidance Agreement India-Mauritius DTAA Capital Gains Tax Beneficial Ownership

NUCON INDIA PVT LTD v. ARPITAM BUILDERS LLP

27 Aug 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5875
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court referred the contract dispute to arbitration, limiting its role to verifying the arbitration agreement and directing the Arbitral Tribunal to decide all substantive issues expeditiously.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 Section 11(6) Section 17

Arun Malik v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi

27 Aug 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:7293

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to the accused in a POCSO case involving repeated sexual assault of a minor, emphasizing the gravity of the offence and the protective object of the legislation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail POCSO Act sexual assault rape

Sandeep Kumar Bhatt v. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India & Ors.

27 Aug 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:6868

The Delhi High Court upheld the IBBI's order suspending an Insolvency Professional for two years, affirming the Board's disciplinary jurisdiction and limited scope of judicial review under Article 226.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Insolvency Professional Disciplinary Committee Section 220 IBC

Shaily Juneja v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 34 -1 and Anr.

27 Aug 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that failure to issue a mandatory notice under Section 143(2) in reassessment proceedings under Sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act renders the proceedings invalid and quashed the reassessment orders.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 143(2) notice reassessment Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 147

Mohit Garg v. Union Bank of India

27 Aug 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:6922

The Delhi High Court held that the dismissal penalty imposed on a bank officer was disproportionate and discriminatory compared to co-delinquents, directing reconsideration of the penalty in light of proportionality and parity principles under Article 14.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant doctrine of proportionality Article 14 equality disciplinary penalty parity in punishment

Central Bank of India v. Anuradha Manchanda

27 Aug 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6497
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the refusal to set aside a five-year-old ex-parte order against the Central Bank of India, holding that negligence and delay without sufficient cause do not justify relief under Order IX Rule 7 CPC.

civil petition_dismissed ex-parte order Order IX Rule 7 CPC setting aside ex-parte order due diligence

Saurav Anand v. Union Public Service Commission

27 Aug 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:7084

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging UPSC's debarment order, holding that the petitioner’s remedy lies exclusively before the Central Administrative Tribunal under Section 14 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant debarment order Union Public Service Commission Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 Section 14

Union of India & Ors. v. Vishvambhar Singh

27 Aug 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:6454-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order granting pensionary benefits including pre-appointment service to the respondent but denied other consequential benefits, dismissing the Union of India's writ petition.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant pensionary benefits Extra Departmental Delivery Agent Gramin Dak Sevak consequential benefits

Indira Gandhi National Centre for Arts v. The P.O. Labour Court-VII & Anr

27 Aug 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:6787

The Delhi High Court held that casual daily wager employees have no right to reinstatement or regularization, awarding compensation in lieu and directing work to be offered as available.

labor petition_dismissed Significant casual worker daily wager regularization reinstatement

Santosh Tyagi v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

27 Aug 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:6471
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court balanced the eviction rights of a senior citizen under the Senior Citizens Act with the residential rights of a daughter-in-law under the Domestic Violence Act, directing financial support and alternate accommodation to protect both parties' interests.

family petition_allowed Significant Senior Citizens Act 2007 Domestic Violence Act 2005 eviction shared household