Delhi High Court

47,108 judgments

Year:

Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and Anr. v. Vishnu Kumar Badetiya

04 Sep 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:6983-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing appointment of an SC candidate with an out-of-State caste certificate, affirming that SC reservation benefits extend to migrants in Union Territories like Delhi.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Scheduled Caste reservation Union Territory reservation Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board Deepak Kumar judgment

Dr. Anjali Vinocha v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

04 Sep 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:8061-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a contractual employee on sabbatical leave with conditions on rejoining has no automatic right to contract renewal or reinstatement post-expiry without vacancy and must participate in recruitment processes.

employment appeal_dismissed Significant contractual employment sabbatical leave rejoining rights contract renewal

Boston Scientific India Pvt. Ltd. v. Advanced Medtech Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

03 Sep 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5018
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of a 28-day delay in re-filing an arbitration petition, holding that procedural defects did not render the initial filing invalid and emphasizing a liberal approach to delay in re-filing under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34(3) condonation of delay non est filing

Amba Shakti Steels Ltd. v. Sequence Ferro Private Limited

03 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bahru; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:6703-DB

Delhi High Court allowed interim injunction restraining respondent from using the deceptively similar trademark 'AMMAJI' against appellant's registered 'AMBA' marks, emphasizing overall commercial impression and likelihood of confusion.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Passing off Interim injunction Likelihood of confusion

M/S D OCEANIC DOLPHIN APPARELS PVT LTD v. M/S THE LEATHER CO & ORS

03 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:6732-DB

The Delhi High Court held that territorial jurisdiction objections under Order VII Rule 10 CPC must be decided on the plaint's averments and that exclusive jurisdiction clauses in invoices do not oust jurisdiction for unrelated disputes, restoring the suit to the Commercial Court.

civil appeal_allowed Significant territorial jurisdiction Order VII Rule 10 CPC exclusive jurisdiction clause demurrer

S.K. Tyagi & Ors. v. Delhi Transco Ltd. & Ors.

03 Sep 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:6887

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing reconsideration of promotion eligibility by counting continuous service in the feeder grade irrespective of the date of acquiring the engineering degree, following the Supreme Court's ruling in T. Valsan (2023).

administrative appeal_allowed Significant promotion eligibility continuous service feeder grade engineering degree

MUNCHENER RUCKVERSICHERUNGS GESELLSHAFT AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT IN MUNCHEN v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 2 & ANR.

03 Sep 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:7052-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an assessee is entitled to TDS credit reflected in Form 26AS without revising the original return, and the Assessing Officer must amend the assessment order under Section 155(14) to grant such credit.

tax petition_allowed Significant Tax Deducted at Source Section 155(14) Income Tax Act, 1961 TDS credit

Hari Kishan Sharma v. Govt of NCT of Delhi

03 Sep 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:6902-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition permitting the petitioner to file a revised income tax return and claim refund of TDS despite delay, holding that limitation prescribed by CBDT Circular cannot restrict the Court's writ jurisdiction.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Tax Deducted at Source Revised Income Tax Return Limitation Period

Anil Kumar Yadav v. Union of India; Mukesh Taterway v. Union of India

03 Sep 2024 · Rekha Palli; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:6788-DB

The Delhi High Court held that CRPF officers posted to static MHA offices in public interest are entitled to relaxation of mandatory field service requirement for financial upgradation, setting aside the denial of such relief.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Mandatory Field Service Non-Functional Financial Upgradation Central Reserve Police Force Ministry of Home Affairs

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. v. Pardeep Singh

03 Sep 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:6935-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order directing BSNL to reimburse actual medical expenses with interest where approved rates were not notified, dismissing BSNL's writ petition challenging the reimbursement beyond CGHS/package rates.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant BSNL Medical Reimbursement Scheme CGHS rates empanelled hospital medical reimbursement

M/S JOIN PACK MACHINES PVT LTD v. M/S BALKRISHNA PAPER MILLS LTD

03 Sep 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:7346-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a unilateral and vague jurisdiction annotation on invoices does not oust Delhi court's jurisdiction where part of the cause of action arises in Delhi, setting aside the return of plaint order.

civil appeal_allowed Significant territorial jurisdiction Order VII Rule 10 CPC unilateral jurisdiction clause cause of action

Army Public School Dhaula Kuan v. Archana Dhawan & Anr.

03 Sep 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:6707-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld that a teacher's resignation can be withdrawn before formal acceptance and effective date under Rule 114A of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973, dismissing the school's appeal.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant resignation withdrawal of resignation Delhi School Education Rules 1973 Rule 114A

Ajit Kumar Gola v. State (GNCTD) and Anr.

03 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:7070

The Delhi High Court held that at the summoning stage, courts must not reappreciate evidence or conduct mini trials, and upheld the summoning of police officials for assault despite absence of medical evidence, rejecting the discharge of one accused by the revisional court.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant summoning order Section 200 Cr.P.C. Section 197 Cr.P.C. police officials

Jitender Kumar v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

03 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:6715

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC

Parth Dua v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr

03 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:6712

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 338 IPC arising from a road accident due to an amicable settlement and compensation paid, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement minor offences

Aman and Others v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr

03 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:6701

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement between the married parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act amicable settlement

Anil Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi

03 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:6725

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 288 and 337 IPC arising from a minor injury caused during construction, relying on an amicable settlement and compensation, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC criminal negligence amicable settlement

Tejinder Singh v. Kulinder Singh Sahni

03 Sep 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:6872

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretion to dismiss a summary judgment application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC in a tenancy dispute involving composite rent and pending title issues, emphasizing the need for clear admissions and trial of triable issues.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC judgment on admission Delhi Rent Control Act 1958 rent enhancement

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited v. Plintron India Private Limited

03 Sep 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:6869

The Delhi High Court held that expired telecom service contracts cannot be extended by judicial or quasi-judicial orders, setting aside TDSAT's interim stay and directing orderly transition.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Empanelment Agreement Contract expiry TDSAT jurisdiction Public sector undertaking

Vikramjeet Singh Mann v. University Grants Commission & Ors.

03 Sep 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:6856-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking retrospective recognition of an open distance learning MBA qualification, holding that such recognition is barred by regulatory prohibitions and the writ petition was barred by laches.

administrative appeal_dismissed retrospective recognition open distance learning University Grants Commission laches