Delhi High Court

47,108 judgments

Year:

Delhi Transport Corporation v. Ashok Kumar

04 Sep 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:7208-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of DTC's appeal against refusal to approve termination of a conductor, directing partial wages and compensation due to flawed inquiry and prolonged litigation.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary inquiry termination of service Industrial Disputes Act 1947 Section 33(2)(b)

Prakash Daryani v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

04 Sep 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:7160

The Delhi High Court held that summons issued to a company director under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act cannot be quashed if the complaint contains sufficient averments of his responsibility for the company’s business, emphasizing a liberal approach to uphold cheque bounce provisions.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act vicarious liability director liability

Jeyanth Kishore Ramasamy v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

04 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:7119

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, holding that inadvertent and unconscious possession of a single cartridge does not constitute an offence.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Arms Act, 1959 Section 25 conscious possession single cartridge

Avinash Kota v. State of NCT of Delhi

04 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:7118

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, holding that mere physical possession of a single live cartridge without conscious knowledge does not constitute an offence.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Arms Act, 1959 Section 25 Arms Act ammunition definition conscious possession

Kishwari Begam v. New-Delhi Municipal Council

04 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:6871-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the legal heir of a deceased eligible street vendor is entitled to exercise the deceased’s rights under the Street Vendors Act and related rules, including participation in Town Vending Committee elections and seniority benefits, despite absence of a formal certificate of vending.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Street Vendors Act 2014 tehbazari license certificate of vending legal heir substitution

Shri Dhruv Jalan v. Smt. Rosy Gaur

04 Sep 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:6754

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s refusal to recall witnesses or reopen defence evidence under Section 311 CrPC at the final stage, rejecting delay tactics based on counsel’s negligence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 311 CrPC Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 cross-examination recall of witness

Akhilesh Kumar Bhadoria & Ors. v. State & Anr.

04 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:6764

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Gautam Arya & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr

04 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:6755

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC

Nilesh Kumar Chaudhary v. Union of India and Another

04 Sep 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:6882

The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing re-evaluation of a disputed answer in a recruitment exam, entitling the petitioner to appointment upon clearing remaining tests.

administrative petition_allowed Significant writ petition Article 226 recruitment examination answer key challenge

GL Sharma v. Central Public Information Officer

04 Sep 2024 · Acting Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:6832-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal upholding that RTI requests seeking personal information of employees related to VRS approvals are exempt under section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act and cannot be used for roving enquiries without demonstrating larger public interest.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 Section 8(1)(j) Voluntary Retirement Scheme Personal information exemption

Aas Mohammad v. Sh Manoj Kumar

04 Sep 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:6793

The Delhi High Court held that an insurance company is estopped from denying the genuineness of an insurance policy after accepting liability in earlier claims arising from the same accident and upheld the compensation awarded to the claimant.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant insurance cover note issue estoppel motor accident claim forgery of insurance policy

Anil Kalra & Anr v. Sheikh Mohd Iqbal

04 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6836

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of tenants for subletting premises under a license agreement that effectively created a sub-tenancy, emphasizing substance over form in determining possession and tenancy.

property petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 subletting license vs tenancy exclusive possession

Dr Anjali Vinocha v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

04 Sep 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:7369

The Delhi High Court held that a contractual employee on sabbatical leave has no absolute right to re-join or contract extension absent vacancy and participation in the selection process, dismissing the writ petition seeking such relief.

employment petition_dismissed contractual employment sabbatical leave re-joining rights contract renewal

Girja Devi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

04 Sep 2024 · ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE; TUSHAR RAO GEDELA · 2024:DHC:6820-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging removal of an unauthorized structure on public land, holding it did not qualify for protection under slum rehabilitation or street vendor laws.

property appeal_dismissed unauthorized occupation public land Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015 DUSIB Act, 2010

X v. State

04 Sep 2024 · Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:6746
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to add trafficking charges under Section 370 IPC, holding that the material did not prima facie establish the offence and affirming the scope of Section 216 CrPC for altering charges before judgment.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 216 CrPC Section 370 IPC trafficking charge framing

RBG Leasing and Credit Limited v. Reserve Bank of India & Anr.

04 Sep 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:6794

The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of an NBFC’s registration by RBI for non-maintenance of Net Owned Fund and remanded the matter for fresh consideration based on relevant material.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Non-Banking Financial Company Net Owned Fund Certificate of Registration Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934

M/S. UNISHIRE HOMES LLP v. SRIGANESH CHANDRASEKARAN AND OTHERS

04 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6812

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 challenging an NCDRC order as non-entertainable since the same order was already under challenge before the Supreme Court by way of a Civil Appeal.

constitutional petition_dismissed Article 227 Constitution of India supervisory jurisdiction National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission Civil Appeal

Tejinder Singh v. Beverley Singh

04 Sep 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:6811-DB

The Delhi High Court emphasized strict adherence to procedural timelines in matrimonial proceedings, allowed limited relief to the appellant with fresh deadlines, and imposed costs for delay caused by the appellant's conduct.

family appeal_allowed Significant Family Court affidavit of evidence cross-examination procedural timelines

Ahmad Ali v. Manohar Singh Pannu and Anr

04 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6800

The court stayed execution proceedings against the petitioner on disputed identity grounds, permitting deposit of a lesser amount pending appeal disposal.

civil appeal_allowed execution proceedings disputed identity stay of execution deposit condition

Smt. Shanti Devi v. Union of India

04 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6795

The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal to examine additional witnesses in a railway compensation claim, emphasizing the need to provide every opportunity to ascertain the truth under the beneficial Railway Claims Tribunal Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 compensation claim untoward incident beneficial legislation