Delhi High Court
47,108 judgments
Seema Asthana v. Jaideep Arora
The Delhi High Court quashed a complaint under Section 138 NI Act against a non-executive director due to lack of specific allegations of responsibility for the company’s business or involvement in the cheque transaction.
Bhanu Pratap v. Babul
The High Court set aside an ex parte possession recovery decree under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act for lack of impleadment of the government and violation of the right to be heard, remanding the matter for fresh trial.
INFINITI RETAIL LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court directed the adjudicating authority to independently consider the petitioner’s responses to the GST Show Cause Notice without relying solely on the audit report, ensuring procedural fairness in tax demand adjudication.
Association of Power Producers v. Solar Energy Corporation of India Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking directions to clarify GST applicability on Battery Energy Storage Systems, holding that GST liability must be determined under statutory provisions and that the petition was belated and without merit.
Jagmohan Lal & Anr. v. The Chairman TVC-NDMC & Ors.
Delhi High Court directed NDMC to consider petitioners’ representation for alternative vending sites and issuance of LORs under the Street Vendors Act and PM SVANidhi scheme, while upholding the No-Vending Zone status pending fresh vending plan.
Prateek Aggarwal & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.
Ct. Amit @ Amit Kumar v. Govt of NCT of Delhi The SHO and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279/337 IPC arising from a road accident due to amicable settlement and compensation paid, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Ashish Verma & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.
KAIRA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD & ANR. v. BIO LOGIC AND PSYCHOTROPICS INDIA PRIVATE LTD & ANR.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and awarded costs and damages to plaintiffs for infringement of their well-known trademark 'AMUL' by defendants using the same mark on pharmaceutical products.
Delhi Development Authority v. Vaibhav Malik & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s order holding that DDA’s fixation of 01.01.2022 as the eligibility date for LDCE was arbitrary and contrary to DoPT regulations prescribing 01.07, dismissing the petitioner’s writ petition.
MORINGO ORGANICS PRIVATE LIMITED v. MAREESOFT INFOTECH OPC PVT LTD & ORS
The Delhi High Court referred the petition to the arbitral tribunal for adjudication under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, without expressing any opinion on merits, and maintained interim orders.
Laxman Singh Prajapati & Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' claim to land held as unauthorized occupants, reaffirming prior rulings and holding that repeated litigation without new evidence is an abuse of process.
Jatin Grover v. Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Limited IREDA & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging IREDA's recruitment policy and appointments, holding that PILs are not maintainable in service matters and unsuccessful candidates who participated without objection cannot later challenge the selection process.
Shutham Electric Ltd. v. Vaibhav Raheja & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award based on admitted liability, valid service of arbitration notice, and proper appointment of sole arbitrator, upholding the award for repayment of loan with interest.
T N Chopra & Anr v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors
The Delhi High Court directed respondents accused of encroaching public park land to submit title documents to enable demarcation, warning of adverse consequences for non-compliance.
Raminder Singh & Anr. v. Surender Pal Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of a conditional family settlement, holding that contempt jurisdiction cannot enforce conditional obligations or adjudicate familial conduct.
Shafeena Begum v. Rajender Singh Sisodia
The Delhi High Court held that non-payment of mesne profits under an executive decree cannot be enforced by contempt proceedings and directed the petitioner to seek remedy through execution proceedings.
M/S SRI SHYAM INCORPORATION & ANR. v. M/S BANSAL SHOE FACTORY
The Delhi High Court set aside the order striking off defence for non-filing of written statement during the Covid-19 pandemic, allowing the petitioner one opportunity to file the statement considering the exclusion of limitation period.
Manoj K Gautam v. Israel
The High Court held that a Trial Court cannot recall an order closing cross-examination without notice and hearing, and set aside such recall orders for fresh consideration with due process.
Pranav Ansal v. Kiran Sharma & Anr.
The Delhi High Court recalled bailable warrants issued against a petitioner wrongly identified as a Judgment Debtor, directing him to appear before the NCDRC for factual clarification.