Delhi High Court
47,108 judgments
Susheela Rana & Ors. v. Brij Bhushan Rana
The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal as not pressed and directed the Trial Court to expeditiously decide the injunction application in a partition suit after the appellant ceased construction activity.
M/S DWARKADHIS PROJECTS PVT. LTD v. SHRI PRATAP CHAND NASA & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that it lacks jurisdiction under Article 227 to entertain a petition against an NCDRC order when the cause of action arose elsewhere, allowing withdrawal with liberty to approach the appropriate High Court.
FIITJEE LTD v. HANS RAJ SHARMA
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 challenging an NCDRC order for lack of territorial jurisdiction, directing the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional High Court where the cause of action arose.
Master Arnesh Shaw v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court mandates the Union of India to provide sustainable, timely, and free treatment for rare disease patients by finalizing a National Policy, establishing a dedicated fund, and promoting indigenous drug development and crowdfunding under the constitutional right to health.
Master Arnesh Shaw v. Union of India & Anr.
Delhi High Court upheld the fundamental right to health for rare disease patients, directing the Union of India to notify a National Policy, establish a Rare Diseases Fund, and promote indigenous therapies and alternative funding mechanisms.
Lava International Limited v. Mintellectuals LLP
The Delhi High Court upheld arbitral tribunal's orders directing enhanced interim security by bank guarantee, emphasizing limited judicial interference and adequacy of reasons under the Arbitration Act.
Anil Kumar Maggu v. Food Corporation of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a contract termination clause permitting termination without reason upon notice, dismissing writ petitions challenging the termination as a pure contractual dispute not warranting judicial interference.
Ramandeep Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of Ramandeep Singh, a key accused in a large heroin trafficking syndicate, holding that the serious nature of the offence, commercial quantity involved, and corroborative evidence outweigh grounds for bail despite prolonged custody.
Ramesh Kumar v. The State
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a cheating and criminal breach of trust case, holding that imposing a monetary deposit as a bail condition in private disputes is improper and emphasizing cooperation with investigation.
Waseem Seikh v. State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail applications of husband and wife accused under the NDPS Act, emphasizing the seriousness of the offence, absconding conduct, and ongoing investigation despite no direct recovery from them.
Deepika Prashar & Anr v. Suman Singh Virk & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity and binding effect of a family settlement for partition and possession of property, ordering defendants to hand over possession and pay damages for unlawful retention.
Sehegal Hossain v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused under PMLA after balancing his right to liberty against the nature of the offence and stage of trial, emphasizing mandatory compliance with Section 45 PMLA conditions.
Castrol Limited v. Vipin, Trading as All in One Business Solutions and Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunctions and damages to Castrol Limited against defendants for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off involving the mark 'SUPER CASTROL' and directed withdrawal of infringing trademark applications.
Avtar Singh Mankoo v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court held that DDA must send allotment notices to all addresses on record and that cancellation without proper notice is arbitrary, allowing petitioners' claims despite delay under Article 226.
Master Enterprises Pvt Ltd v. Jay Kay Coir Foam Pvt Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court cancelled the respondent’s trademark registration 'MOLTY' for lack of prior use and likelihood of confusion with the petitioner’s well-known mark, affirming that proposed use and trans-border reputation confer proprietary rights under Section 18 of the Trade Marks Act.
Vishal Kochhar v. Pallavi Kashyap Kochhar
The Delhi High Court increased the paternal grandmother's visitation time with the child on her birthday from five to fifteen minutes, emphasizing reasonable visitation rights in guardianship matters.
Sanjay Kumar v. The State Govt of NCT Delhi and Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 337 IPC arising from a motor vehicle accident after the parties amicably settled and compensation was paid, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Commissioner of Police v. Harish Chhikara
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's quashing of a police constable's dismissal post-acquittal, holding departmental punishment requires additional evidence beyond that in the criminal trial under Rule 12(e) of DPPAR.
Capital Broadways Pvt. Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer Ward 5(3) Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that mechanical approval without reasons under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act invalidates the reopening notice under Section 148, quashing the impugned notice issued to the petitioner.
Deepak Yadav v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the Indian Air Force's selection process for Airmen 'Y' Group, dismissing the petition challenging non-selection despite equal marks, as the selection criteria were lawfully and fairly applied.