Delhi High Court
38,124 judgments
Jasbir Singh v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court disposed of a contempt petition directing respondents to reconsider an alleged shortfall in medical claim reimbursement and communicate their decision within four weeks.
M/S SATYADHARA COMMUNICATIONS PVT LTD v. M/S INDIASIGN PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act due to inordinate unexplained delays in filing and re-filing, holding that condonation of delay in arbitration appeals is an exception requiring sufficient cause.
Pooja Sharma v. Arun Sharma
The Delhi High Court held that an unimplemented matrimonial settlement does not bar a wife from claiming interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
Muzaz @ Azad v. State (Govt. of N.C.T of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's application for suspension of sentence during appeal in a POCSO sexual assault case, holding that minor contradictions in the victim's testimony do not undermine conviction and that suspension is not warranted given the heinous nature of the offence and limited sentence served.
Yama Merajuddin v. Usha Rathi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's appeal against a compromise decree based on mediation, holding such appeals barred under Section 96(3) CPC and rejecting the claim of bar under Section 50 of the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Gurpreet Singh v. Neelam Dutt
The High Court upheld the trial court's decree dismissing the appellants' claim of adverse possession due to failure to prove peaceful, open, continuous, and hostile possession against a known owner.
FORECH INDIA PVT LTD v. SHRI INDER PAL SINGH BINDRA SECRETARY COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition against the Competition Commission of India, holding that the Commission complied with Court directions regarding investigation document disclosure and cross-examination rights, and that no wilful contempt was committed.
Maj Shubhra Verma v. Lieutenant General Gurbirpal Singh
The Delhi High Court held that the Director General of NCC lacks authority as Disciplinary or Appellate Authority under the POSH Act for Group 'A' officers and found the respondent guilty of contempt for non-compliance with Court directions, directing referral of the petitioner's appeal to the proper authority with a fair hearing.
M/S Kamdhenu Enterprises v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held the State guilty of wilful contempt for denying NOC based on outdated records despite no subsisting acquisition award, directing issuance of NOC within three weeks.
Kshitij Ghildiyal v. Director General of GST Intelligence, Delhi
The Delhi High Court held the petitioner's arrest under the CGST Act illegal for failure to furnish written grounds of arrest and improper detention, setting aside the remand order and ordering immediate release.
Barla Hemanth Kumar v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that routine annual medical fitness does not guarantee qualification for promotion through LDCE, upholding the Review Medical Board's decision declaring the petitioner medically unfit.
Gedela Chandra Sekhara Rao v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the disqualification of a departmental candidate for having tattoos on prohibited areas, holding that compliance with medical standards in LDCE appointments is mandatory and no relief for tattoo removal is warranted.
Krishan v. M/S Oriental Ins Co Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that deceased passengers accompanying their own goods for a religious purpose were not gratuitous passengers, thereby denying the Insurance Company's recovery rights against the vehicle owner for compensation paid under the Motor Vehicles Act.
New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Sunil & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld enhanced compensation under amended Section 163-A Motor Vehicles Act for a fatal accident predating the Notification, applying the beneficial amendment to all pending claims.
Marriott Worldwide Corporation v. Hotel Marriot Prime & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of Marriott Worldwide Corporation, declaring 'MARRIOTT' a well-known trademark and restraining defendants from infringing it, awarding damages for deliberate trademark infringement and passing off.
Boston Ivy Healthcare Solutions Private Limited v. M/S Accord Medical Products Private Limited
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to the plaintiff against the defendant for trademark infringement and passing off of the mark "Medikabazaar" by the deceptively similar "Medicalbazzar" in the medical e-commerce sector.
CANDICO (I) LIMITED v. T.R. KOHLI, TRADING AS T.R. KOHLI AND SONS AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and directed registration of the trademark “JUMBO GUMBO” after holding that the opponent’s trademark application was abandoned and opposition under Section 11 could not be sustained.
PUMA SE v. Surender Singh and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed Puma SE's petition to cancel the deceptively similar trademark 'P11MA' registered by respondent no.1, holding it violated Sections 9 and 11 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Harkesh Sharma v. National Insurance Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against dismissal of a motor accident claim, holding that delay in FIR registration and absence of damage to the offending vehicle do not conclusively disprove the accident or negligence.
Subodh Kumar v. Sanjay Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a motor accident victim by recalculating permanent disability, awarding loss of marriage prospects, increasing loss of amenities, and raising interest rate from 7.5% to 9% per annum.