Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
The Khetri Trust v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a genuine testamentary transfer of leasehold property to a charitable trust is not liable to pay Unearned Increase, quashing the L&DO's demand.
Gopal Singh v. Kalawati Devi
The Delhi High Court fixed use and occupation charges at Rs. 13,000 per month for a longstanding tenancy, allowing recovery of arrears and conditioning interim protection on timely payment.
Lokesh Mehta v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner was entitled to the functional pay scale of ₹ 14300-18300/- from the date of his ad hoc promotion as Superintending Engineer, quashing the withdrawal of the scale despite pending vigilance proceedings.
Puerto Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd. v. Sterimax India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a Purchase Order, respecting the parties' agreement on seat and venue of arbitration.
Gaurav Kukreja v. M/S Earthz Urban Spaces Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes under a construction agreement, directing settlement efforts before merits and compliance with disclosure norms.
TATA CAPITAL LIMITED v. AADINATH STEEL & ORS
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to respondents' failure to respond to arbitration notice, enabling arbitration proceedings to resolve loan agreement disputes.
Vikrant v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Army authorities to consider the petitioner's request to be attached in Delhi pending a criminal case, respecting bail conditions restricting his movement, and restrained his transfer to Assam until a decision is made.
Nand Kishore Gupta v. The Additional Director General, Directorate General of GST Intelligence & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that Indian currency is not "goods" under the CGST Act and cannot be seized under Section 67 merely as unaccounted wealth, directing release of Rs. 23,50,000 seized from the petitioner.
Sh. Om Prakash v. Joginder Solanki & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a rent increase notice and dismissal of the tenant's appeal, affirming that a 30-day notice period under the Delhi Rent Control Act is mandatory but effective date discrepancies do not invalidate the notice if service is proper.
Smt Nirmal & Anr. v. Shri Roshan Lal Gupta
The Delhi High Court stayed the eviction order until 31.12.2025 on the petitioners' undertaking to vacate the premises and pay agreed user charges, dissolving the stay upon default.
Harsharan Kaur & Ors. v. Amarjeet Kaur
The Delhi High Court granted tenants additional time to vacate premises by staying eviction order subject to payment of occupation charges and filing an undertaking ensuring compliance.
Deep Minor v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that children of mothers abandoned by their husbands are entitled to Scheduled Caste certificates without requiring formal divorce or separation decrees, directing the authorities to consider such applications on merits.
Lallu Ram v. Manju Devi
The High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding the plaintiff's ownership and entitlement to possession despite minor discrepancies in property description, affirming the concurrent findings of the lower courts.
Dr. Ratan Lal v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of an FIR under Sections 153A and 295A IPC, holding that the petitioner’s social media posts demonstrated deliberate and malicious intent to outrage religious feelings and disturb public harmony.
Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. v. Rajesh Mewalal Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a loan agreement containing a valid arbitration clause, after the petitioner complied with procedural requirements including substituted service.
Prabha Aggarwal v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of the petitioner's discharge and directed framing of charges under Section 509 IPC, holding that a prima facie case was made out and that the Sessions Court cannot recall its own order.
Surinder Mohan & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that cognizance of offences under Section 195 Cr.P.C requires a written complaint and proper application of mind by the Family Court, setting aside orders taken without such compliance and remanding the matter for reconsideration.
Padi Sai Chandu Reddy & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR alleging forgery and fraud in visa applications, holding that a prima facie case exists and inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC should be exercised sparingly.
J.P. Kapoor v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, after the competent authority refused to appoint one, setting aside a prior unilateral appointment as invalid.
Jasdeep Singh & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Sections 509 and 506 IPC, holding that the prima facie offences require trial as the complainant refused to accept the unconditional apology.