Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Ashok Jindal v. Union of India through the Chairman Railway Board & Ors
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to constitute an Integrated Medical Board within four weeks to assess the petitioner's medical fitness following his permanent disability from a railway injury.
Mohd Sadat Ashraf & Ors. v. Delhi Waqf Board Through & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Tribunal's refusal to expedite hearing, holding that preferential treatment cannot be granted and such petitions constitute abuse of process.
Haseeb Ahmad v. Delhi Waqf Board
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking expedited hearing and reinstatement, holding it cannot interfere with the Tribunal’s scheduling and that preferential treatment is not permissible.
X v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 for lack of prima facie evidence, affirming the limited scope of judicial scrutiny at the charge framing stage under Sections 227 and 228 CrPC.
Aseem Mowar v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and all proceedings against the petitioner in a neighbourly dispute, holding that the allegations were inconsistent, trivial, and did not prima facie constitute offences warranting trial.
M/S OKARA ROADLINES v. M/S PUNJAB FREIGHT CARRIERS PVT. LTD. & ORS.
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of respondents in Section 138 NI Act cases, holding that the statutory presumption of liability was successfully rebutted by establishing a probable defence of no debt and loss or theft of cheques.
Deepak Jain & Ors. v. Basketball Federation of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the Basketball Federation of India's restrictive birth certificate rule and directed adherence to the National Code Against Age Fraud in Sports mandating medical age verification to ensure fair participation.
Ocean Plastics and Fibers P Limited v. Delhi Development Authority and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the denial of lease restoration benefits to a leaseholder whose lease was determined and possession taken over by the DDA following eviction proceedings, holding that the policy does not apply in such cases.
SI Sahil v. Om Prakash
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's acquittal of respondents under Sections 506 and 384 IPC, dismissing the State's appeal for lack of proof of criminal intimidation and extortion.
Prabhu Dayal v. State, NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court set aside the charge of gang rape under Section 376D IPC against the petitioner due to lack of material implicating him in the offence at the charge framing stage.
Bharat Mohan Kohli v. State & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and refused to condone a 636-day delay in challenging an order rejecting impleadment of a claimant alleging marriage to the deceased, emphasizing the duty of litigants to be vigilant and provide satisfactory explanations for delay.
Vikash Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that it can recall its quashing order passed per incuriam due to overruling of relied Supreme Court precedent, as the bar under Section 362 Cr.P.C. does not apply to such recall under inherent powers.
Tanisha Rani Sharma v. State NCT of Delhi
The High Court held that summoning a person not named in the charge-sheet under Section 319 Cr.P.C. requires strong evidence adduced before the court and set aside the summoning order against the petitioner for lack of such evidence.
Santosh Kumar Yadav @ Ranjan v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a juvenile in conflict with law is not required to disclose juvenile offences in service verification forms, and termination on such grounds is unsustainable, directing reinstatement of the petitioner.
Makhdum Ali Haidar v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed the adverse APAR grading of a BSF officer for lack of justifiable reasons and procedural fairness, holding that regularized Over Stay Leave cannot justify adverse remarks and no second representation lies after the first is decided.
Ashok Kumar v. Sitara & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of a belated amendment application in an eviction suit, emphasizing the requirement of due diligence under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC as amended in 2022.
Kishan Lal Bhandula v. Sushil Bhandula
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging possession recovery as barred by limitation, holding that a 1327-day delay was not sufficiently explained to condone under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Porter Buildcon Private Ltd & Ors v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that aggrieved parties must exhaust statutory appeals under the Benami Act against adjudication orders, condoned delay in filing appeals due to pending writ petition, and declined interim relief against confiscation proceedings.
Usha International Limited v. The Sub Divisional Magistrate (Vasant Vihar) and Ors
The Delhi High Court directed the revenue authorities to update the mutation entry in the revenue records in favor of the petitioner upon filing of the application and compliance with statutory requirements.
SI Kriti Singh v. Saiyama @ Saiba
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's discharge of the accused from charges of trafficking and conspiracy, holding that mere passive knowledge without overt acts is insufficient to frame charges at the prima facie stage.