Delhi High Court

38,124 judgments

Year:

Sahil Singh v. Union of India & Anr.

24 Jan 2025 · Navin Chawla; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:384-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking bonus marks for an NCC-A Certificate not claimed in the application form, holding that declarations in the application are binding and technical glitches do not justify granting unclaimed benefits.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant NCC-A Certificate bonus marks recruitment process application form

Wasim v. Mumtaz Begum

24 Jan 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:463

The Delhi High Court granted the tenant additional time to vacate premises subject to payment of user charges and an undertaking, staying the eviction order until 31.12.2025.

civil appeal_allowed eviction order user and occupation charges tenant's undertaking stay of execution

Rina Devi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

24 Jan 2025 · Jyoti Singh, J. · 2025:DHC:602
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking compensation for electrocution death on the ground that disputed questions of fact regarding negligence require adjudication by a civil court, not under Article 226 writ jurisdiction.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 226 writ petition electrocution compensation

Pradeep Kumar v. Election Commission of India and Ors

24 Jan 2025 · Jyoti Singh · 2025:DHC:408

The Delhi High Court held that writ petitions under Article 226 challenging election matters during the election process are barred by Article 329(b) and the Representation of People Act, 1951, and the exclusive remedy lies in filing an election petition after the election.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 329(b) Constitution of India Representation of People Act 1951 writ petition maintainability election petition

Munni Devi v. M/S Olive Exim Pvt. Ltd.

24 Jan 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:695
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition, affirming that companies can file eviction petitions under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act and that pendency of similar matters before larger benches does not bar adjudication on merits.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) eviction petition company as landlord

Mohd Iqbal v. Azmmuddin & Anr

24 Jan 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:696

The High Court upheld the eviction order against the tenant, holding that the landlord proved a better title and the tenant's ownership claim based on unregistered documents and continued rent payments was insufficient to warrant a trial.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 eviction ownership better title

Chitra Sharma v. Union of India

24 Jan 2025 · Navin Chawla; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:435-DB

The Delhi High Court directed a medical re-examination of the petitioner for appointment as Constable, holding that disqualification without further diagnostic evaluation was unjustified.

administrative petition_allowed Significant medical fitness Review Medical Examination Board physical standard test physical efficiency test

Radhey Shyam v. Parmeshwari Das & Anr.

24 Jan 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:829
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The High Court held that suits pending before courts lacking jurisdiction due to administrative changes should be transferred under Section 24 CPC rather than returned under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC to preserve prior proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant subject matter jurisdiction territorial jurisdiction Order 7 Rule 10 CPC Section 24 CPC

G. Balasubramanian v. C.B.I.

24 Jan 2025 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2025:DHC:673

The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charges against a retired bank official, ruling that the amended sanction requirement under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act does not apply to offences registered before the amendment.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 19 amendment sanction for prosecution revisional jurisdiction

Vijender Gupta v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi

24 Jan 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:377

The Delhi High Court held that while laying CAG Reports before the Legislative Assembly is a mandatory constitutional duty, the power to summon the Assembly rests solely with the Speaker and is immune from judicial review, thus refusing to direct a special sitting for tabling delayed reports.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant CAG Reports Article 151(2) Constitution of India Government of NCT of Delhi Act, 1991 Speaker powers

Bhagwan Malik v. State of NCT of Delhi

24 Jan 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:387

The Delhi High Court granted furlough to a long-term convict despite prior late surrender during furlough, emphasizing the rehabilitative purpose of furlough under prison rules and subject to strict conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant furlough parole prison rules good conduct

Nandan Singh v. Pratap Singh & Ors.

24 Jan 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024 SCC OnLine Del 7161

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court’s finding of a valid oral partition of joint family properties based on conduct and evidence, dismissing the appellant’s suit for partition and rendition of accounts.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant oral partition family settlement Hindu joint family partition by metes and bounds

Vijay Gupta v. Ajay Pal Singh

23 Jan 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:787
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant on bona fide requirement grounds, affirming the validity of a family settlement and limiting its revisionary jurisdiction under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) bona fide requirement eviction petition

State v. Yasir Ali

23 Jan 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:657

The High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a rape case due to material contradictions in the prosecutrix's testimony and lack of corroborative evidence, emphasizing the need for credible and consistent evidence to sustain conviction under Section 376 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape Section 376 IPC sole testimony prosecutrix

The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -1 v. Adobe Systems Software Ireland Ltd

23 Jan 2025 · Yashwant Varma; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar

The Delhi High Court upheld that no further profit attribution to Adobe India's Permanent Establishment is warranted once arm's length remuneration is established, dismissing claims of wider functions and tax avoidance schemes.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Permanent Establishment Dependent Agent PE Fixed Place PE Arm's Length Principle

Bimal Roy Gambhir v. Dilip Gambhir & Others

23 Jan 2025 · Subramonium Prasad · 2025:DHC:457

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a registered gift deed and related conveyance, dismissing the plaintiff's claim of forgery and entitlement to partition of the property.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Gift Deed Transfer of Property Act Partition Suit Registered Instrument

Dr. Pushpalata and Anr. v. Ram Das HUF & Ors.

23 Jan 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:351

The Delhi High Court held that the Ram Das HUF was validly created with self-acquired property included as joint family property, and the plaintiffs are entitled to their coparcenary shares under the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, while recognizing the effect of a gift deed partitioning the Kothi.

property appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Undivided Family coparcenary rights Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act 2005 partition

Sh. Prasadi Lal v. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court New Delhi and Anr.

23 Jan 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:341
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Labour Court’s finding that the petitioner failed to prove an employer-employee relationship, affirming limited scope of judicial review under Article 226 in labor disputes.

labor petition_dismissed Significant employer-employee relationship Labour Court Award illegal termination Article 226 jurisdiction

Vijay Srivastava v. Roop Darshan Pandey and Ors.

23 Jan 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2025:DHC:337-DB

Delhi High Court held that malicious and baseless allegations against the Court and its Registry in a legal notice and its publication constituted criminal contempt, initiated proceedings against the contemnors, and emphasized the duty of advocates and journalists to act responsibly.

criminal conviction_upheld Significant criminal contempt contempt of court legal notice abuse of process

Dalip Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi

23 Jan 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:356

The Delhi High Court allowed a convicted prisoner’s petition for furlough despite a prior late surrender, emphasizing furlough as a progressive correctional measure subject to conditions ensuring compliance.

criminal petition_allowed Significant furlough parole prisoner conduct Delhi Prison Rules 2018