Delhi High Court
98,981 judgments
Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation-2 v. Pacific Consultants International Inc
The Delhi High Court upheld the deletion of penalty for concealment of income where the assessee acted under a bona fide belief, based on government agreements, that taxes would be paid by the Government, negating any intention to evade tax.
Ramesh Kumar Sehgal v. Canara Bank
The Delhi High Court held that compulsory retirement imposed as a penalty entitles a bank officer to leave encashment under Regulation 38, rejecting delay objections and directing payment with interest.
UOI & Ors v. RPS Panwar
The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of delayed and procedurally flawed disciplinary proceedings against a retired government servant, emphasizing compliance with Rule 14 of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965.
Surender Pal Singh v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the respondents unlawfully converted the petitioner’s commuted leave into earned leave without his consent and despite substantive medical compliance, directing reconsideration and grant of commuted leave with consequential benefits.
National Highway Authority of India v. MS Jas Toll Road Company Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award granting extension of the concession period to Jas Toll Road Company Ltd. due to force majeure events and revenue losses under the Concession Agreement with NHAI.
Sewak Balkishan Gupta v. The State
The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charges in a criminal conspiracy and forgery case, ruling that limitation for cognizance restarts from the Supreme Court's restoration of the quashed FIR.
Sewak Balkishan Gupta v. The State
The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charges in a criminal conspiracy and forgery case, ruling that limitation restarts upon Supreme Court restoration of a quashed FIR and delay alone does not warrant quashing proceedings.
Sewak Balkishan Gupta v. The State
The Delhi High Court held that cognizance taken and charges framed within three years of the Supreme Court's restoration of a quashed FIR are not barred by limitation, dismissing petitions challenging the framing of charges in a criminal conspiracy and forgery case.
Sewak Balkishan Gupta v. The State
The Delhi High Court held that cognizance taken and charges framed within three years of the Supreme Court's restoration of a quashed FIR are valid, dismissing petitions challenging the framing of charges on limitation and sufficiency of evidence grounds.
M/S. Tatvadarshi Bandhu Pvt. Ltd. v. Omaxe Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld that failure of the landowner to obtain consolidation clearance, a contractual condition precedent, entitled the developer to terminate the agreement and claim refund with interest, dismissing the owner's appeal against the arbitral award.
Manjeet Singh Kohli v. Mirajuddin & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed a compromise decree for specific performance in a land dispute, dismissed transposition applications by legal heirs lacking pleadings, and clarified that such compromise does not affect third-party rights.
BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD. & ANR. v. M/S. TALUPULA ENGG. CO.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that the appellant's termination of the contract was illegal and the delay was attributable to the appellant, dismissing the appeal.
Suman v. M/S BATA INDIA
The Delhi High Court held that a registered design cannot be protected as a trade mark or trade dress for passing off claims, dismissing suits based solely on passing off of registered designs as not maintainable.
Veena Khanna v. Indian Bank
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's finding of a concluded lease contract based on correspondence and dismissed the appeal challenging damages awarded for breach of contract.
Union of India v. Prabhu Nath Prasad; Union of India v. N. Jaymma
The Delhi High Court upheld entitlement to Patient Care Allowance for Group 'D' employees handling infected materials at a non-hospital health institute, emphasizing factual duty-based eligibility over institutional classification.
Union of India v. Prabhu Nath Prasad; Union of India v. N. Jaymma
The Delhi High Court upheld entitlement to Patient Care Allowance for Group 'D' employees handling infected materials at a non-patient admitting institute, emphasizing factual duty-based eligibility over institutional classification.
Union of India v. Prabhu Nath Prasad; Union of India v. N. Jaymma
The Delhi High Court upheld the entitlement of Group 'C' and 'D' employees at the National Institute of Communicable Diseases to Patient Care Allowance based on their exposure to infection risk, emphasizing factual determination over strict institutional criteria.
Avinash Sharma v. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that work-charged service and suspension period during which the petitioner was exonerated must be counted as qualifying service for pension, entitling the petitioner to pension and medical benefits despite voluntary retirement.
Atul Goel v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against a share broker accused of abetting disproportionate asset accumulation, holding that verified share transactions during a stock market boom did not prima facie establish criminal liability.
Parma Nand Yadav & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that candidates delayed in joining due to administrative lapses are entitled to seniority and pension benefits based on their merit position, not date of joining.