Delhi High Court
98,981 judgments
Pardeep Dev v. State
The Delhi High Court held that absence of threat or harm to the kidnapped child negated Section 364A IPC, but upheld convictions for kidnapping for ransom and conspiracy under Sections 363 and 120B IPC, modifying the sentence accordingly.
Pardeep Dev v. State; Vishnu Vishwas v. State
The Delhi High Court modified the appellants' conviction from kidnapping with threat under Section 364A IPC to kidnapping for ransom under Section 363 IPC and conspiracy under Section 120B IPC, sentencing them to the period already served.
Punjab & Sind Bank v. Nand Lal Phatnani
The Delhi High Court upheld that departmental proceedings against pensioners cannot be initiated for events older than four years under Regulation 48(2) of the Punjab & Sind Bank Pension Regulations, dismissing the bank's appeal.
Punjab & Sind Bank v. Nand Lal Phatnani
The Delhi High Court upheld that departmental proceedings against pensioners cannot be initiated for events older than four years under Punjab & Sind Bank Pension Regulations, dismissing the bank's appeals.
Punjab & Sind Bank v. Nand Lal Phatnani
The Delhi High Court held that departmental proceedings against pensioners cannot be initiated for misconduct occurring more than four years prior, upholding the limitation under Regulation 48(2) of the Punjab & Sind Bank Pension Regulations.
Punjab & Sind Bank v. Nand Lal Phatnani
The Delhi High Court upheld that departmental proceedings against pensioners cannot be initiated for events older than four years under Punjab & Sind Bank Pension Regulations, dismissing the bank's appeal.
Punjab & Sind Bank v. Nand Lal Phatnani
The Delhi High Court upheld that departmental proceedings against pensioners are barred if initiated more than four years after the alleged misconduct under Regulation 48(2) of Punjab & Sind Bank Pension Regulations, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in State of UP v. Krishna Pandey.
Bharti Infratel Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and Another
The Delhi High Court held that reassessment beyond four years under Section 147 is invalid if the assessee has fully and truly disclosed all material facts, and reopening on mere change of opinion is impermissible.
Archana v. Himanshu Bahl
The Delhi High Court upheld the annulment of marriage on grounds of mental cruelty, finding the wife’s allegations false and her conduct cruel towards the husband.
UOI & Ors. v. Abhishekh Dixit
The Delhi High Court upheld the Ministry of Home Affairs' flexible interpretation of the 1985 roster system for cadre allocation, overturning the CAT's strict merit-cycle approach and dismissing the respondent's challenge.
Babu Lal Yadav v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the petitioner’s premature discharge from the Indian Army, holding that the discharge was lawful and voluntary with no infirmity or illegality.
Bhagwan Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a retired employee found fit by a DPC is entitled to notional promotion and pensionary benefits even if actual promotion is denied due to retirement before the DPC.
Mr. Shivam Tiwari; Ms. Urmila Sharma; Ms. Deepika Kalra; Ms. Venni Kakkar v. OM PRAKASH
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s order directing payment of interest on delayed leave encashment benefits, holding that withholding such benefits requires a specific decision under Rule 39(3) CCS Leave Rules and that interest can be awarded for unreasonable delay even without statutory provision.
Krishan Kumar & Anr v. Shakuntla Agency Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an arbitral award for specific performance, holding that the petitioners' failure to participate and raise objections during arbitration precluded reappreciation of facts under Section 34.
Krishan Kumar & Anr v. Shakuntla Agency Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition, holding that an arbitral award cannot be challenged on grounds of documents not placed before the tribunal and refused to remand the matter for reconsideration.
The Commissioner of Police Delhi v. Inspr Prem Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing grant of ACP and MACP benefits to a police officer from the dates of eligibility, holding that censure punishments cannot defer such benefits beyond six months.
Swami Ramdev v. Juggernaut Books Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside injunctions restraining publication of an unauthorized biography of Swami Ramdev, holding that freedom of speech and expression outweighs the petitioner's claim to reputation and privacy absent clear malice and falsehood.
Surender Babbar v. Delhi Transco Ltd. & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld administrative orders assigning the petitioner to DPCL and granting additional charge of Director (Finance) to respondent no.4 in DTL, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge and directing expeditious regular appointment.
Man Mohan v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of Manmohan, upholding his conviction for the murder of his father by manual strangulation based on strong circumstantial evidence and motive.
Saranpal Kaur Anand v. Praduman Singh Chandhok & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding the suit barred by limitation based on plaintiff's admissions and upheld the rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC.