Delhi High Court

36,666 judgments

Year:

Gautam Saluja v. Jitender Kumar Sethi & Alka Sethi

17 Feb 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:993

The Delhi High Court allowed the revision petition and set aside the order dismissing the petitioner's application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the suit challenging the ex parte decree on grounds of fraud was barred by limitation and did not disclose a cause of action.

civil appeal_allowed Significant fraud on court Order VII Rule 11 CPC ex parte decree limitation

SFDC Ireland Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax & Another

17 Feb 2025 · Vibhu BakhrU; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:977-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Assessing Officer’s refusal to grant a nil withholding tax certificate under Section 197, holding that tax deduction at source is required unless the non-resident’s income is not chargeable to tax in India and no permanent establishment exists.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 197 Income Tax Act Section 195 Income Tax Act Tax Deducted at Source Permanent Establishment

Tulsi Ram v. State

17 Feb 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:994

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking police directions for FIR registration, holding that certified copies of documents and alternative legal remedies suffice without mandatory police intervention.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. FIR registration fabrication of documents Muster Roll

Sonu v. Central Bureau Investigation

17 Feb 2025 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2025:DHC:971
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s order allowing the prosecution to rectify an incomplete document post-final arguments without it constituting fresh evidence, holding that such rectification under Section 311 CrPC is permissible and does not violate the accused’s right to a fair trial.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 311 CrPC Section 173(8) CrPC fresh evidence rectification of evidence

Shubham Yadav v. Central Bureau Investigation

17 Feb 2025 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2025:DHC:970
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s order allowing the prosecution to rectify an incomplete document and recall witnesses post-final arguments, holding it was not fresh evidence requiring further investigation and did not violate the accused’s right to a fair trial.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 311 CrPC Section 173(8) CrPC fresh evidence rectification of evidence

Nursheid Mansuri @ Vishal v. Narcotics Control Bureau

17 Feb 2025 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:1023

The Delhi High Court granted bail to a foreign national accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case, emphasizing the right to speedy trial and imposing stringent conditions despite the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS bail in commercial quantity cases right to speedy trial

Shahbuddin v. The State NCT of Delhi

17 Feb 2025 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:1027

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a simple injury assault case, emphasizing cooperation with investigation and parity with co-accused already on bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 482 BNSS Section 438 CrPC parity principle

Anita Sharma v. Ved Prakash Gupta

17 Feb 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:1036

The Delhi High Court granted the tenant an extension to vacate the premises until 30.09.2025 on payment of user charges and compliance with an undertaking, staying the eviction order accordingly.

property appeal_allowed eviction order extension of time user and occupation charges tenancy dispute

M/S. PURAN CHAND COMPANY v. SH. ASHOK KUMAR VERMA & ORS.

17 Feb 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:1039

The Delhi High Court disposed of a contempt petition after respondents agreed to withdraw a coercive communication issued despite the petitioner furnishing the required undertaking for extension of possession.

civil petition_dismissed contempt of court extension of time undertaking vacate possession

Ramada International, Inc. v. Clubramada Hotels and Resorts Private Limited & Anr.

17 Feb 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:1553

The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment and permanent injunction to Ramada International against defendants for bad faith trademark infringement of the 'RAMADA' mark, awarding damages and costs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement summary judgment Order XIII-A CPC permanent injunction

INFINITI RETAIL LIMITED v. M/S CROMA WHOLESELLER & ORS.

15 Feb 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2025:DHC:1160

The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment and permanent injunctions to Infiniti Retail Ltd. against multiple defendants for unauthorized use of the 'CROMA' trademark in domain names, directing transfer of infringing domains and suspension of related telecom and payment services.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off summary judgment Order XIII-A CPC

TATA SKY LIMITED v. S G ENTERPREISES – TATA SKY SALES AND SERVICES AND ORS.

15 Feb 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh

The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay for a foreign defendant due to registry error, clarified the roles of domain registries in blocking infringing domain names, and directed implementation of RBI's beneficiary name lookup facility to prevent misuse of brand names in banking transactions.

civil other Significant Limitation Act 1963 Domain Name Registry Domain Name Registrar Trademark infringement

Jan Chetna Jagriti Avom Shaikshanik Vikas Manch v. Sh Anand Raj Jhawar Sole Proprietor of M/s RR Agrotech

14 Feb 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:934

The Delhi High Court dismissed the application for condonation of a 562-day delay in filing an appeal, holding that professional misconduct of counsel alone does not justify condonation where the litigant, an educated NGO, failed to vigilantly pursue the case.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay Section 5 Limitation Act professional misconduct of counsel duty of litigant

Executive Engineer v. Aakash Construction Company & Anr

14 Feb 2025 · Chandra Dhari Singh, J · 2025:DHC:1353

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging its earlier judgment on arbitration clause ambiguity and trial court's reliance on RTI documents, reaffirming the limited scope of review jurisdiction under CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Significant review petition arbitration agreement Order 47 Rule 1 CPC Order VII Rule 11 CPC

The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Khushanuma and Ors.

14 Feb 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:911
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the review petition enhancing compensation in a motor accident claim by applying correct minimum wages and future prospects as per Pranay Sethi, while emphasizing the need to consider cross objections in appeals.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation notional income minimum wages

Shagun Bagai and Anr v. Veena Luthra and Ors

14 Feb 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:932

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld summary decree for recovery of possession against licensees holding property without right or title after termination of license.

civil appeal_dismissed Order XII Rule 6 CPC recovery of possession licensee General Power of Attorney

Union of India v. Reliance Industries Limited & Ors.

14 Feb 2025 · Rekha Palli; Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:914-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal challenging an arbitral award permitting Reliance Industries to lawfully produce and sell migrated gas under a Production Sharing Contract, holding the arbitration as international commercial and the award not violative of public policy.

arbitration_commercial appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Production Sharing Contract Migrated gas Public Trust Doctrine

Alok v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

14 Feb 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:931

The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail for a man accused of repeated sexual assault on a minor, emphasizing the seriousness of the offences, consistent victim statements, and ongoing investigation despite the accused’s claims of fabrication and reliance on CCTV footage.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail sexual assault minor victim POCSO Act

Nira Garg v. Subhash Kumar Grover

14 Feb 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:1013

The Delhi High Court condoned a 445-day delay in refiling a revision petition under the Delhi Rent Control Act, clarified the applicable three-year limitation period under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, and limited trial court proceedings to the issue of alternate accommodation with strict timelines.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay revision petition Delhi Rent Control Act limitation period

Suvashish Roy v. Narcotics Control Bureau

14 Feb 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:954
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused involved in commercial quantity drug trafficking under the NDPS Act, holding that stringent bail conditions under Section 37 apply despite procedural irregularities, and directed expeditious trial proceedings.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS bail commercial quantity