NILESH GIRKAR v. ZEE ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES LIMITED

Delhi High Court · 17 Feb 2025 · 2025:DHC:924-DB
Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur
RFA(COMM) 159/2024
2025:DHC:924-DB
other other Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court issued a corrigendum to a prior judgment to record the appearance of the appellant's counsel that was previously omitted.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RFA(COMM) 159/2024
NILESH GIRKAR .....APPELLANT
Through: Mr.Rahul Ajatshatru, Ms.Swati Chanana and Ms.Shilpi Mehta
Nanda, Advs.
VERSUS
ZEE ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES LIMITED & ORS. .....RESPONDENTS
Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR O R D E R 17.02.2025
On mentioning, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that their presence has not been recorded in the
JUDGMENT
dated 07.02.2025.
Let their appearance be also reflected in the said Judgment.
Let the present order be uploaded as a corrigendum to the
Judgment dated 07.02.2025.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J SHALINDER KAUR, J FEBRUARY 17, 2025/sg/DG