Delhi High Court

98,981 judgments

Year:

Ram Pyare v. Union of India

29 Apr 2013 · Gita Mittal; Deepa Sharma · 2013:DHC:2164-DB

The Delhi High Court held that color blindness detected after induction cannot bar promotion and quashed cancellation of promotion orders, directing the petitioner’s promotion with retrospective benefits.

administrative petition_allowed Significant color blindness promotion medical fitness Article 14

Aziz v. State

29 Apr 2013 · Mukta Gupta · 2013:DHC:2162

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 20 NDPS Act in a chance recovery case but reduced the sentence in default of fine from two years to one year, affirming that strict compliance with Section 50 NDPS is not mandatory in such cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 50 NDPS chance recovery chain of custody

Sudha Vadehra v. Harsh Malhotra

29 Apr 2013 · Indermeet Kaur · 2013:DHC:2155

The High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of a late application by the legal representative of a deceased defendant to file an additional written statement without disclosing its content, emphasizing timely and proper exercise of rights under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order 22 Rule 4 CPC additional written statement legal representatives deceased defendant

Union of India v. Gopal Dass

29 Apr 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; V. Kameswar Rao · 2013:DHC:2161-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing examination and consideration of regularization for a casual labourer granted temporary status, rejecting the petitioners' challenge to the denial of regularization under a recruitment ban.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant temporary status scheme regularization casual labourer recruitment ban

Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Baljeet Singh & Ors.

26 Apr 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; V. Kameswar Rao · 2013:DHC:2105-DB

The Delhi High Court held that financial upgradations under the ACP scheme must follow the Municipal Corporation of Delhi's promotional hierarchy pay scales, not Central Government scales, and set aside the Tribunal's contrary order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme financial upgradation Municipal Corporation of Delhi pay scale

Shakuntala Devi v. Land & Building Department & Ors.

26 Apr 2013 · V.K. Jain · 2013:DHC:2089

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to process the petitioner's application for allotment of an alternative plot in order of seniority within specified timeframes, refusing immediate allotment or compensation for delay.

administrative petition_dismissed alternative plot allotment land acquisition seniority of applications writ of mandamus

Karan Singh & Anr v. Union of India & Anr

26 Apr 2013 · V.K. Jain · 2013:DHC:2088

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as barred by limitation, holding that the appellants failed to show sufficient cause to condone a delay of over seven years in filing the appeal despite being represented by counsel.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay limitation period sufficient cause Section 5 Limitation Act

Mahavir Singh v. Union of India

26 Apr 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; V. Kameswar Rao · 2013:DHC:2093-DB

The Court allowed the petitioner to seek clarification of an ambiguous Tribunal order on pay fixation after medical de-categorization, while upholding the principle that pay protection does not guarantee placement in the original pay scale and emphasizing proper pleading for res judicata.

administrative other Significant medical de-categorization pay fixation pay scale last drawn pay

Ram Lal v. The State

26 Apr 2013 · Sanjiv Khanna; V. P. Vaish · 2013:DHC:2092-DB

The Delhi High Court converted the appellant's conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, sentencing him to 12 years rigorous imprisonment for a fatal stabbing during a sudden fight.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part I IPC Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC sudden fight

Yuil Measures India Ltd. v. Vilas Gupta

26 Apr 2013 · S. Muralidhar · 2013:DHC:2091
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the auction sale of YMIL's assets to a bona fide purchaser despite the Customs Department's claim of confiscation, due to lack of inventory and identification of confiscated goods.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant auction sale confiscated goods Customs Act, 1962 Official Liquidator

Amit Kumar Tanwar v. MCD & Anr.

26 Apr 2013 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2013:DHC:2106

The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiff contractor is entitled to interest at 10% per annum on delayed payments by MCD in absence of any contractual bar, despite payment of principal during suit pendency.

civil appeal_allowed Significant interest on delayed payment municipal contracts Delhi Municipal Corporation Act 1957 non-plan head payments

M/S. KIDARSONS INDUSTRIES PVT LTD & ORS v. M/S. HANSA INDUSTRIES PVT LTD & ORS

26 Apr 2013 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; DEEPA SHARMA · 2013:DHC:2094-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the matter for proper adjudication of valuation and entitlements before drawing a decree implementing the Supreme Court's directions in a property settlement dispute.

civil appeal_allowed Significant settlement agreement property valuation decree drawing Supreme Court directions

Sh. Ramswarup Azad v. Central Bank of India and Anr.

26 Apr 2013 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2013:DHC:2097

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that promotion depends on passing the examination and setting aside a debarment on technical grounds does not entitle automatic promotion or salary increments.

employment petition_dismissed promotion debarment natural justice salary increments

Vinod v. State

26 Apr 2013 · Sanjiv Khanna; Siddharth Mridul · 2013:DHC:2108-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder based on credible sole eyewitness testimony despite minor discrepancies and rejected the appellant's plea for reduced sentence or acquittal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder sole eyewitness testimony Section 302 IPC premeditation

Syed Ashraf Hasnain Rizvi v. Union of India

26 Apr 2013 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2013:DHC:2096

The Delhi High Court held that refusal of permission under Section 86 CPC to execute a decree against a foreign embassy must be preceded by a speaking order following natural justice, and remitted the matter for reconsideration accordingly.

civil petition_allowed Significant Section 86 CPC permission to execute decree foreign embassy quasi-judicial function

Rajinder Kumar & Ors v. Krishna Kumari

26 Apr 2013 · Indermeet Kaur, J. · 2013:DHC:2095

The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of tenants on the landlord's bona fide need under the Delhi Rent Control Act, dismissing the tenants' claim of sham documents and fabricated grounds.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) eviction petition bona fide need

Rockman Breweries (TNK) Limited v. Kohli One Housing and Development Pvt. Ltd.

26 Apr 2013 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2013:DHC:2113

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the admission of a winding up petition, holding that the appellant company was unable to pay its debts and the alleged cancellation agreement was invalid.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant winding up Companies Act 1956 Section 433 Section 434

Vineeta Soni v. University of Delhi & Anr.

26 Apr 2013 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2013:DHC:2112

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that failure to submit qualifying exam results by the prescribed deadline justified refusal of admission and that the appellant could not re-agitate the issue after dismissal of the earlier writ petition.

administrative appeal_dismissed provisional admission qualifying examination results deadline for submission writ petition

Rajan Sachdeva v. State of Delhi

26 Apr 2013 · Kailash Gambhir · 2013:DHC:6867

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners not clearly implicated in a suicide note under Section 306 IPC, while denying bail to the petitioner against whom serious allegations were made.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 306 IPC abetment of suicide suicide note

Ashok Kumar & Anr v. SBI Officers Association (Delhi Circle) & Anr

26 Apr 2013 · Manmohan Singh

The Delhi High Court held that disciplinary and election disputes in an association governed by specific Bye laws are not arbitrable under the general arbitration clause, and dismissed petitions seeking interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act to stay such proceedings.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 Bye laws Disciplinary action