Delhi High Court
97,710 judgments
Rakesh Kumar Saini v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court heard multiple writ petitions filed by various petitioners against the Delhi Development Authority concerning administrative grievances, with judgment reserved and pronounced in May 2013.
Shailender Pratap Singh v. Union of India; Lokesh v. Staff Selection Commission
The Delhi High Court held that technical errors in roll number entry cannot justify zero marks and directed awarding correct marks and appointment if merited.
Basant Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging disciplinary proceedings on the ground of cadre jurisdiction, holding that a long-accepted posting cannot be belatedly challenged and disciplinary inquiry conducted with due process is valid.
U.P. State Road Transport Corporation v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
The Delhi High Court held that imposition of damages under Section 14-B of the Employees Provident Fund Act is discretionary and requires reasoned orders within prescribed limits, quashing mechanical orders and remanding for fresh adjudication.
Sanjay Gupta v. Arun Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree declaring a gift deed void as it pertained to a non-existent second floor, relying on judicial admissions and Section 124 of the Transfer of Property Act.
Phool Chand Maurya and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi
The High Court upheld the murder conviction of Mohan Lal but modified the convictions of co-accused Phool Chand and Yogesh to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, emphasizing the necessity of proving common intention for murder liability.
Dr. Baba Sahib Ambedkar Hospital v. Swastika Bhakat
Delhi High Court held that contract para-medical employees are entitled to equal basic pay and allowances as regular employees but not increments or promotions without regularization or Tribunal orders granting such benefits.
VIACOM 18 MEDIA PRIVATE LTD & ANR v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court held that consultation with the BCCC is not mandatory before imposing penalty under Section 20 of the Cable Act and upheld a 10-day transmission ban on the petitioner for broadcasting obscene content.
Rajinder Saini and Anr v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging eviction of occupants from grazing land, holding that absence of formal lease or renewal option rendered occupation unauthorized and eviction under the Public Premises Act valid.
Dr. Baba Sahib Ambedkar Hospital v. Swastika Bhakat
Delhi High Court held that contract hospital employees are entitled to pay parity in basic salary and allowances with regular employees but not to increments or promotions without regularization or Tribunal orders granting such benefits.
Rakesh Kumar Saini v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court heard multiple connected writ petitions filed by various petitioners against the Delhi Development Authority, with judgment reserved on 21.05.2013 and pronounced on 24.05.2013.
Rakesh Kumar Saini v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court reserved and pronounced judgment on multiple connected writ petitions filed against the Delhi Development Authority concerning administrative matters.
Rakesh Kumar Saini and Anr v. Delhi Development Authority
This judgment concerns multiple writ petitions filed by various petitioners against the Delhi Development Authority, decided by the Delhi High Court on May 24, 2013.
Rakesh Kumar Saini and Anr v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court delivered a consolidated judgment on multiple writ petitions filed by various petitioners against the Delhi Development Authority concerning administrative matters.
Rakesh Kumar Saini and Anr v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court reserved and pronounced judgment on multiple connected writ petitions filed against the Delhi Development Authority concerning administrative matters.
Rakesh Kumar Saini and Anr v. Delhi Development Authority
This judgment pertains to multiple writ petitions filed against the Delhi Development Authority in 2013, heard together by the Delhi High Court, with the judgment reserved and pronounced in May 2013.
Rakesh Kumar Saini and Anr v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court heard multiple connected writ petitions filed by various petitioners against the Delhi Development Authority, reserving judgment on May 21, 2013 and pronouncing it on May 24, 2013.
Rakesh Kumar Saini and Anr v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court reserved and pronounced judgment on multiple connected writ petitions filed by various petitioners against the Delhi Development Authority in May 2013.
Shyam Sunder & Anr. v. Meena Taneja
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellants' review application and regular second appeal, upholding the possession decree in favor of the respondent based on valid relinquishment deeds and a registered Will.
Jeet Ram v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the treatment of the petitioner's unauthorized absence as 'dies non' causing break in service and dismissed his claim for full pay and allowances.