Delhi High Court
97,209 judgments
State of U.P. v. Ram Kumar Sachan & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision dismissing charges of ante-dating an order against a government officer, emphasizing the need for logical evidence in departmental inquiries.
V. B. Andley v. Motia Wanti
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's second appeal, affirming the lower appellate court's decree for possession and mesne profits, holding that delay in appeal was rightly condoned, mesne profits could be awarded without inquiry, and the appellant failed to prove adoption or ownership.
Pioneer Products v. Alberto Culver International Inc.
Delhi courts lack territorial jurisdiction to try the trademark infringement suit as the plaintiff failed to establish carrying on business in Delhi through an exclusive distributor, leading to setting aside of interim injunction.
Eaton Corporation & Anr v. BCH Electric Limited
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction to Eaton Corporation restraining BCH Electric Limited from using the CUTLER-HAMMER and related trademarks, affirming plaintiffs' prior rights and rejecting defendant's claims of abandonment and estoppel.
Sh. Lalit Mohan Madhan v. ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that an unregistered lease is a month-to-month tenancy terminable by 15 days' notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, and the plaintiff was entitled to mesne profits for unauthorized occupation after valid termination.
Rakesh Muni Tyagi v. DTC
The Delhi High Court held that termination of a daily wage Retainer Crew Conductor under terms permitting dispensation without notice does not amount to retrenchment or entitle the employee to regularization or compensation.
Raju Kapoor v. Management of M/s Janata Coop. Bank
Termination of a probationary employee without confirmation does not amount to illegal retrenchment under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Mahesh Chand v. MGT. of M/s. Le Meridien
Termination of probationers in accordance with contract terms does not constitute retrenchment under the Industrial Disputes Act, and thus does not attract Section 25-F protections.
Mahesh Chand v. Mgt. of M/s. Le Meridien
Termination of probationers' services in accordance with contract terms does not constitute retrenchment under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and thus does not attract Section 25-F protections.
Mahesh Chand v. Mgt. of M/s. Le Meridien
Termination of probationers in accordance with contract terms does not constitute retrenchment under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and thus does not attract Section 25-F protections.
Kiran Diwania v. Financial Commissioner, Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that probate conclusively establishes Will genuineness, set aside mutation based on false claims, and remanded the land mutation dispute for fresh decision excluding Will genuineness but considering title under land reform laws.
Pankaj Bajaj v. Meenakshi Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit holding that a cooperative society could not transfer title beyond its limited rights under a government agreement, and possession without lawful title cannot be protected.
Harbans Kaur v. Bhai Balbir Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff’s suit seeking declaration of share and injunction against an arbitral award as not maintainable when partition and probate suits are pending, holding that such relief must be sought in the partition suit.
M/S GE CAPITAL SERVICES INDIA v. DR. MOHAN CHATURBHUJ JHAMVAR & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed defendants' application for leave to defend a loan recovery suit under Order 37 CPC, affirming jurisdiction and limitation, and decreed recovery with interest and costs in favor of the plaintiff.
Satya Pal Gupta v. Sudhir Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that unregistered release of property shares and entries in balance sheets do not effectuate transfer of immovable property, dismissed SPG's suit for sole ownership, and decreed possession in favor of SKG.
Satya Pal Gupta v. Sudhir Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that unregistered release of property shares between brothers does not transfer ownership under law, dismissed SPG's suit for declaration of sole ownership, and decreed possession in favor of SKG.
Pradeep Jain v. Ameena Begum & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for specific performance due to the plaintiff's failure to prove readiness and willingness to pay the balance sale consideration on the agreed date.
VALE AUSTRALIA PTY. LTD. v. STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award awarding damages to SAIL for breach of a coal supply contract, affirming that risk purchase damages under international long-term contracts must be interpreted in light of trade usages and waiver of notice requirements.
VALE AUSTRALIA PTY. LTD. v. STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award awarding damages to SAIL for breach of a coal supply contract by VALE/AMCI, clarifying the application of risk purchase doctrine and waiver of notice in long-term commodity contracts.
VALE AUSTRALIA PTY. LTD. v. STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding VALE/AMCI liable for breach of contract for non-supply of hard coking coal, affirming the applicability of risk purchase damages and waiver of notice requirements in international long-term supply contracts.